Curtis
W-L: ( 5- 6) PR = 87.8035Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 311 H Kennedy ( 6- 8, 87.9) 9-11 314 A Stadium (11- 2, 91.5) 10-14 320 H Peninsula SD ( 6- 5, 88.1) 10- 7 324 H Snohomish ( 7- 6, 91.0) 2-14 331 H Auburn-Riverside ( 3- 8, 81.2) 12- 5 402 H Graham-Kapowsin ( 1-10, 77.4) 13- 0 403 A Klahowya ( 1- 9, 76.3) 18- 1 424 A Lakeside School (11- 4, 95.9) 4-15 425 H Tahoma ( 7- 6, 85.3) 11- 6 428 A Bellarmine Prep ( 8- 4, 91.1) 7-11 430 A Puyallup (13- 1, 95.7) 5-23
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
311 H Kennedy 9-11 -2 0 - -2.43
314 A Stadium 10-14 -4 -4 0.21
320 H Peninsula SD 10- 7 3 0 + 2.80
324 H Snohomish 2-14 -12 -3 - -2.33
331 H Auburn-Riverside 12- 5 7 7 0.00
402 H Graham-Kapowsin 13- 0 13 11 0.00
403 A Klahowya 18- 1 17 11 0.00
424 A Lakeside School 4-15 -11 -9 0.00
425 H Tahoma 11- 6 5 3 1.97
428 A Bellarmine Prep 7-11 -4 -4 -0.19
430 A Puyallup 5-23 -18 -8 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 311 H Kennedy 9-11 -2 0 - -2.43 324 H Snohomish 2-14 -12 -3 - -2.33 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 320 H Peninsula SD 10- 7 3 0 + 2.80 |
Curtis Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anacortes | Curtis | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Curtis | |
| Auburn-Riverside | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Ballard | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Bellarmine Prep | Bellarmine Prep | Bellarmine Prep | ||
| Bellevue | Bellevue | Bellevue | ||
| Big Cat | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Camas | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Eastlake | Eastlake | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Eastlake | |
| Eastside Catholic | Eastside Catholic | Eastside Catholic 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Evergreen | Curtis | Curtis 5- 4 vs 2- 7 | ||
| Garfield | Curtis | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Curtis | |
| Gonzaga Prep | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Graham-Kapowsin | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Holy Names Academy | Curtis | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Curtis | |
| Issaquah | Issaquah | Issaquah | ||
| Kamiakin | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Kennedy | Kennedy | Kennedy | ||
| Klahowya | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Lakeside School | Lakeside School | Lakeside School | ||
| Lincoln | Curtis | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Curtis | |
| Mercer Island | Mercer Island | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Mercer Island | |
| Mount Si | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Mount Si | |
| Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Curtis | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Curtis | |
| Newport Sammamish Interl | Newport Sammamish Interl | tied - ( 1- 4) ( 1- 4) | Newport Sammamish Interl | |
| Northshore | Northshore | Northshore 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Overlake | Curtis | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Curtis | |
| Peninsula SD | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Puyallup | Puyallup | Puyallup | ||
| Richland Hanford | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Roosevelt | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Sandpoint | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Seattle Academy | Seattle Academy | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Seattle Academy | |
| Seattle Prep | Seattle Prep | Seattle Prep 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Shoreline | Curtis | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Curtis | |
| Snohomish | Snohomish | Snohomish | ||
| Spokane | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| Squalicum | Curtis | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Curtis | |
| Stadium | Stadium | Stadium | ||
| Stanwood | Curtis | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Curtis | |
| Sumner | Sumner | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) | Sumner | |
| Tahoma | Curtis | Curtis | ||
| West Seattle | Curtis | tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) | Curtis | |
| Woodinville | Woodinville | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Woodinville |
PowerWise = 25
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 12.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Kennedy ( 6- 8, 87.9) 9-11 -11.99 11.78 -0.53 1.12 -14.01
0 A Stadium (11- 2, 91.5) 10-14 -8.42 15.35 0.53 1.12 -8.82
0 H Peninsula SD ( 6- 5, 88.1) 10- 7 -11.76 12.01 -0.53 1.12 12.84
0 H Snohomish ( 7- 6, 91.0) 2-14 -8.89 14.88 -0.53 1.12 -10.54
0 H Auburn-Riversi ( 3- 8, 81.2) 12- 5 -18.67 5.10 -0.53 1.12 5.11
0 H Graham-Kapowsi ( 1-10, 77.4) 13- 0 -22.53 1.24 -0.53 1.12 0.79
0 A Klahowya ( 1- 9, 76.3) 18- 1 -23.56 1.00 0.53 1.12 1.72
0 A Lakeside Schoo (11- 4, 95.9) 4-15 -3.99 19.78 0.53 1.12 -3.87
0 H Tahoma ( 7- 6, 85.3) 11- 6 -14.59 9.18 -0.53 1.12 9.67
0 A Bellarmine Pre ( 8- 4, 91.1) 7-11 -8.82 14.94 0.53 1.12 -9.27
0 A Puyallup (13- 1, 95.7) 5-23 -4.23 19.54 0.53 1.12 -4.14
------
-20.53
|
winning pts = 30.1153 losing points = -50.6448
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------