Concord
W-L: ( 2-14) PR = 87.3158Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 A Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 1-16 416 A Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 5-15 421 A Windham ( 5-11, 89.0) 14- 6 423 H Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 6-11 425 A Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 5-13 428 H Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 1-13 502 A Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 4-18 505 A Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 2-12 509 H Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 10-14 512 A Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 1-18 514 H Manchester Central-Wes ( 4-12, 84.2) 8- 9 516 H Nashua North ( 1-11, 85.5) 14- 9 519 H Pinkerton Academy (15- 3, 95.7) 2-17 521 H Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 3- 6 523 H Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 5-15 528 A Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 8-14
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 A Souhegan 1-16 -15 -8 0.00
416 A Exeter HS 5-15 -10 -6 0.00
421 A Windham 14- 6 8 -2 +++ 6.85
423 H Nashua South 6-11 -5 -6 0.00
425 A Nashua South 5-13 -8 -6 0.00
428 H Bishop Guertin 1-13 -12 -7 0.00
502 A Exeter HS 4-18 -14 -6 0.00
505 A Bedford 2-12 -10 -6 0.00
509 H Salem 10-14 -4 -1 - -3.40
512 A Portsmouth 1-18 -17 -13 0.00
514 H Manchester Central-Wes 8- 9 -1 3 -- -4.25
516 H Nashua North 14- 9 5 2 + 2.99
519 H Pinkerton Academy 2-17 -15 -8 0.00
521 H Dover 3- 6 -3 -1 -1.95
523 H Souhegan 5-15 -10 -8 0.00
528 A Londonderry 8-14 -6 -4 -0.81
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 514 H Manchester Central-Wes 8- 9 -1 3 -- -4.25 509 H Salem 10-14 -4 -1 - -3.40 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 421 A Windham 14- 6 8 -2 +++ 6.85 516 H Nashua North 14- 9 5 2 + 2.99 |
Concord Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Concord | Concord | ||
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford | ||
| Belmont | Concord | Concord | ||
| Bishop Brady | Concord | Concord | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Bow | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bow | |
| Campbell | Concord | Concord | ||
| Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | ||
| Concord Christian | Concord | Concord | ||
| ConVal | Concord | Concord | ||
| Derryfield | Derryfield | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Derryfield | |
| Dover | Dover | Dover | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Gilford | Gilford | ||
| Goffstown | Concord | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Concord | |
| Hanover | Hanover | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Hanover | |
| Hollis-Brookline | Hollis-Brookline | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 0- 4) | Hollis-Brookline | |
| Hopkinton | Hopkinton | Hopkinton | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonborou | Concord | Concord | ||
| John Stark | John Stark | John Stark | ||
| Kearsarge | Concord | Concord | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Concord | Concord | ||
| Kennett | Concord | Concord | ||
| Kingswood | Concord | Concord | ||
| Laconia | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Lebanon | Concord | Concord | ||
| Londonderry | Londonderry | Londonderry | ||
| Manchester Central-West | Manchester Central-West | Manchester Central-West | ||
| Manchester Memorial | Concord | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Concord | |
| Merrimack | Merrimack | Merrimack | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Merrimack Valley | Merrimack Valley | ||
| Milford | Concord | Concord | ||
| Nashua North | Concord | Concord | ||
| Nashua South | Nashua South | Nashua South | ||
| Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Oyster River-Newmarket | |
| Pelham | Concord | Concord | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Concord | Concord | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Plymouth | Concord | Concord | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | Salem | Salem | ||
| Souhegan | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Spaulding | Concord | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Concord | |
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Timberlane | Timberlane | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Timberlane | |
| Trinity Manchester | Concord | Concord | ||
| Windham | Concord | Concord | ||
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet 3- 1 vs 0- 4 |
PowerWise = 22
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.96
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 1-16 -4.68 23.25 0.16 1.00 -4.51
0 A Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 5-15 -6.42 21.51 0.16 1.00 -6.25
0 A Windham ( 5-11, 89.0) 14- 6 -10.89 17.03 0.16 1.00 17.14
0 H Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 6-11 -6.72 21.21 -0.16 1.00 -6.86
0 A Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 5-13 -6.72 21.21 0.16 1.00 -6.55
0 H Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 1-13 -4.97 22.95 -0.16 1.00 -5.12
0 A Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 4-18 -6.42 21.51 0.16 1.00 -6.25
0 A Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 2-12 -6.68 21.25 0.16 1.00 -6.51
0 H Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 10-14 -11.83 16.10 -0.16 1.00 -11.95
0 A Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 1-18 -0.00 27.93 0.16 1.00 -0.16
0 H Manchester Cen ( 4-12, 84.2) 8- 9 -15.68 12.24 -0.16 1.00 -15.80
0 H Nashua North ( 1-11, 85.5) 14- 9 -14.43 13.49 -0.16 1.00 13.30
0 H Pinkerton Acad (15- 3, 95.7) 2-17 -4.17 23.76 -0.16 1.00 -4.32
0 H Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 3- 6 -11.38 16.55 -0.16 1.00 -11.50
0 H Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 5-15 -4.68 23.25 -0.16 1.00 -4.82
0 A Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 8-14 -8.55 19.37 0.16 1.00 -8.38
------
-68.51
|
winning pts = 30.4469 losing points = -98.9579
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------