---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:00 PDT

safe3step girls Clover 1
  
Clover                
W-L: ( 8- 7) PR = 86.0956

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 224 H Dutch Fork ( 7- 8, 83.4) 14-10 227 A River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 12- 8 304 A Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 18- 4 307 A Spartanburg (14- 3, 91.3) 5- 6 311 A Lexington (15- 1, 95.7) 6-21 312 H Christ Church Episcopa (13- 5, 86.8) 9-10 314 A Heathwood Hall (10- 4, 83.4) 18- 7 324 A Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 19- 8 327 A Fort Mill ( 8- 2, 89.1) 10-16 403 H Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 11- 8 408 H Catawba Ridge ( 9- 6, 85.6) 13- 3 410 A Catawba Ridge ( 9- 6, 85.6) 4-12 414 H Fort Mill ( 8- 2, 89.1) 6-18 416 H Boiling Springs ( 3- 6, 81.9) 17- 8 423 A Byrnes (10- 7, 85.2) 11-16

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   224 H Dutch Fork             14-10       4     3           0.69
   227 A River Bluff            12- 8       4     1    +      3.49
   304 A Eastside               18- 4      14     5           0.37
   307 A Spartanburg             5- 6      -1    -6    ++     4.00
   311 A Lexington               6-21     -15   -10           0.00
   312 H Christ Church Episcopa  9-10      -1     0          -0.93
   314 A Heathwood Hall         18- 7      11     2    +      2.91
   324 A Nation Ford            19- 8      11     4           0.98
   327 A Fort Mill              10-16      -6    -4          -1.34
   403 H Nation Ford            11- 8       3     5    -     -2.00
   408 H Catawba Ridge          13- 3      10     1    +      3.88
   410 A Catawba Ridge           4-12      -8     0    --    -4.88
   414 H Fort Mill               6-18     -12    -2    -     -2.58
   416 H Boiling Springs        17- 8       9     5           0.20
   423 A Byrnes                 11-16      -5     0    --    -5.27

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   410 A Catawba Ridge           4-12      -8     0    --    -4.88
   423 A Byrnes                 11-16      -5     0    --    -5.27
   403 H Nation Ford            11- 8       3     5    -     -2.00
   414 H Fort Mill               6-18     -12    -2    -     -2.58

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   307 A Spartanburg             5- 6      -1    -6    ++     4.00
   227 A River Bluff            12- 8       4     1    +      3.49
   314 A Heathwood Hall         18- 7      11     2    +      2.91
   408 H Catawba Ridge          13- 3      10     1    +      3.88

Clover Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
AC Flora Clover Clover   4- 3 vs 1- 5
Academic Magnet Clover tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Clover
Aiken Clover Clover   3- 1 vs 0- 4
Ashley Hall Clover insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Clover
Beaufort Clover   Clover
Bishop England Bishop England insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Bishop England
Bluffton Clover   Clover
Blythewood Clover Clover   3- 3 vs 0- 5
Boiling Springs Clover Clover  
Byrnes Byrnes Byrnes  
Carolina Forest Clover tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Clover
Catawba Ridge Clover insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Clover
Chapin Chapin Chapin   4- 2 vs 2- 4
Christ Church Episcopal Christ Church Episcopal Christ Church Episcopal  
Dorman Clover insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Clover
Dutch Fork Clover Clover  
Eastside Clover Clover  
Fort Mill Fort Mill Fort Mill  
Fountain Inn Clover tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Clover
Greenville Clover insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 2) Clover
Heathwood Hall Clover Clover  
Hillcrest Clover insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Clover
Hilton Head Hilton Head   Hilton Head
Irmo Clover Clover   3- 1 vs 0- 4
James Island Clover   Clover
JL Mann Academy JL Mann Academy JL Mann Academy   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Legion Collegiate Academ Clover   Clover
Lexington Lexington Lexington  
Lucy Beckham Lucy Beckham insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Lucy Beckham
Mauldin Clover insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Clover
May River Clover   Clover
Mid-Carolina Clover   Clover
Myrtle Beach Clover   Clover
Nation Ford Clover Clover  
North Myrtle Beach Clover   Clover
Oceanside Collegiate Oceanside Collegiate Oceanside Collegiate   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Philip Simmons Clover   Clover
Pinewood Prep Clover insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Clover
Porter-Gaud School Porter-Gaud School tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Porter-Gaud School
Ridge View Clover   Clover
River Bluff Clover Clover  
Riverside Riverside tied - ( 5- 5) ( 5- 4) Riverside
Socastee Clover   Clover
Spartanburg Spartanburg Spartanburg  
Spring Valley Clover Clover   2- 1 vs 0- 3
St James Clover insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Clover
St Josephs Catholic Clover Clover   2- 2 vs 0- 4
TL Hanna TL Hanna insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 4- 1) TL Hanna
Trinity Collegiate Clover insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Clover
Waccamaw Clover   Clover
Wade Hampton Clover insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 2) Clover
Wando Wando tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Wando
West Ashley Clover   Clover
Westside Clover tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Clover
White Knoll Clover Clover   4- 3 vs 0- 6
Woodmont Clover insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 2) Clover

PowerWise = 41


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 13.58

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Dutch Fork      ( 7- 8, 83.4)    14-10      -16.49      17.18      -0.62         0.91            14.99
   0 A River Bluff     (10- 7, 85.0)    12- 8      -14.94      18.73       0.62         0.91            17.52
   0 A Eastside        ( 5-12, 80.8)    18- 4      -19.06      14.61       0.62         0.91            13.79
   0 A Spartanburg     (14- 3, 91.3)     5- 6       -8.59      25.08       0.62         0.91            -7.22
   0 A Lexington       (15- 1, 95.7)     6-21       -4.23      29.44       0.62         0.91            -3.27
   0 H Christ Church   (13- 5, 86.8)     9-10      -13.11      20.56      -0.62         0.91           -12.43
   0 A Heathwood Hall  (10- 4, 83.4)    18- 7      -16.52      17.15       0.62         0.91            16.09
   0 A Nation Ford     ( 2- 9, 81.5)    19- 8      -18.44      15.22       0.62         0.91            14.34
   0 A Fort Mill       ( 8- 2, 89.1)    10-16      -10.76      22.91       0.62         0.91            -9.18
   0 H Nation Ford     ( 2- 9, 81.5)    11- 8      -18.44      15.22      -0.62         0.91            13.22
   0 H Catawba Ridge   ( 9- 6, 85.6)    13- 3      -14.31      19.36      -0.62         0.91            16.97
   0 A Catawba Ridge   ( 9- 6, 85.6)     4-12      -14.31      19.36       0.62         0.91           -12.39
   0 H Fort Mill       ( 8- 2, 89.1)     6-18      -10.76      22.91      -0.62         0.91           -10.30
   0 H Boiling Spring  ( 3- 6, 81.9)    17- 8      -17.99      15.68      -0.62         0.91            13.63
   0 A Byrnes          (10- 7, 85.2)    11-16      -14.69      18.98       0.62         0.91           -12.74
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        53.01

winning pts = 120.5478 losing points = -67.5328

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------