Christiana
W-L: ( 4- 9) PR = 70.7775
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
326 A Odessa (12- 4, 83.7) 1-21
401 A Middletown ( 5-10, 76.9) 6-15
403 A Newark ( 1-11, 69.2) 11- 8
410 A Conrad School ( 4- 9, 74.1) 8-12
414 H St Marks (11- 5, 87.6) 8-20
417 A Hodgson Vo-Tech ( 8- 7, 74.5) 4-16
428 H Brandywine ( 9- 5, 78.7) 5-19
430 H Appoquinimink ( 6- 9, 79.2) 5-17
502 A St Georges Tech ( 5-10, 74.8) 8-17
506 A Mt Pleasant ( 0-13, 66.3) 16-10
508 H Hodgson Vo-Tech ( 8- 7, 74.5) 10-14
512 H Mt Pleasant ( 0-13, 66.3) 13-11
514 H Newark ( 1-11, 69.2) 14- 8
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
326 A Odessa 1-21 -20 -13 0.00
401 A Middletown 6-15 -9 -6 0.00
403 A Newark 11- 8 3 2 1.50
410 A Conrad School 8-12 -4 -3 -0.63
414 H St Marks 8-20 -12 -17 0.00
417 A Hodgson Vo-Tech 4-16 -12 -4 -1.22
428 H Brandywine 5-19 -14 -8 0.00
430 H Appoquinimink 5-17 -12 -8 0.00
502 A St Georges Tech 8-17 -9 -4 -0.88
506 A Mt Pleasant 16-10 6 4 0.57
508 H Hodgson Vo-Tech 10-14 -4 -4 -0.33
512 H Mt Pleasant 13-11 2 5 - -2.54
514 H Newark 14- 8 6 2 + 3.39
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
512 H Mt Pleasant 13-11 2 5 - -2.54
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
514 H Newark 14- 8 6 2 + 3.39
|
Christiana Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
Glasglow |
Glasglow |
|
 
| Glasglow |
Appoquinimink |
Appoquinimink |
Appoquinimink |
 
| |
Archmere Academy |
Archmere Academy |
|
Archmere Academy   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Brandywine |
Brandywine |
Brandywine |
 
| |
Caesar Rodney |
Caesar Rodney |
|
 
| Caesar Rodney |
Cape Henlopen |
Cape Henlopen |
|
 
| Cape Henlopen |
Caravel Academy |
Caravel Academy |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Caravel Academy |
Concord |
Concord |
|
Concord   7- 1 vs 2- 6 |
|
Conrad School |
Conrad School |
Conrad School |
 
| |
Delaware Military Academ |
Delaware Military Academ |
|
Delaware Military Academ   5- 1 vs 0- 6 |
|
Dover |
Dover |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) |
Dover |
Hodgson Vo-Tech |
Hodgson Vo-Tech |
Hodgson Vo-Tech |
 
| |
Indian River |
Indian River |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) |
Indian River |
Lake Forest |
Christiana |
|
 
| Christiana |
Middletown |
Middletown |
Middletown |
 
| |
Milford |
Milford |
|
Milford   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
Mt Pleasant |
Christiana |
Christiana |
 
| |
Newark |
Christiana |
Christiana |
 
| |
Newark Charter School |
Newark Charter School |
|
Newark Charter School   3- 1 vs 0- 4 |
|
Odessa |
Odessa |
Odessa |
 
| |
Padua Academy |
Padua Academy |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Padua Academy |
Polytech |
Polytech |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) |
Polytech |
Sanford School |
Sanford School |
|
Sanford School   3- 0 vs 0- 3 |
|
Smyrna |
Smyrna |
|
Smyrna   3- 0 vs 0- 3 |
|
St Andrews |
St Andrews |
|
St Andrews   3- 0 vs 0- 3 |
|
St Georges Tech |
St Georges Tech |
St Georges Tech |
 
| |
St Marks |
St Marks |
St Marks |
 
| |
Sussex Academy |
Sussex Academy |
|
 
| Sussex Academy |
Sussex Tech |
Sussex Tech |
|
 
| Sussex Tech |
Tatnall School |
Tatnall School |
|
 
| Tatnall School |
Tower Hill School |
Tower Hill School |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Tower Hill School |
Ursuline Academy |
Ursuline Academy |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Ursuline Academy |
Wilmington Charter |
Wilmington Charter |
|
Wilmington Charter   3- 1 vs 0- 4 |
|
Wilmington Friends |
Wilmington Friends |
|
Wilmington Friends   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
PowerWise = 3

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 13.83
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Odessa (12- 4, 83.7) 1-21 -16.16 17.45 0.05 1.06 -17.13
0 A Middletown ( 5-10, 76.9) 6-15 -23.04 10.57 0.05 1.06 -24.45
0 A Newark ( 1-11, 69.2) 11- 8 -30.68 2.93 0.05 1.06 3.17
0 A Conrad School ( 4- 9, 74.1) 8-12 -25.81 7.80 0.05 1.06 -27.40
0 H St Marks (11- 5, 87.6) 8-20 -12.26 21.34 -0.05 1.06 -13.10
0 A Hodgson Vo-Tec ( 8- 7, 74.5) 4-16 -25.39 8.21 0.05 1.06 -26.95
0 H Brandywine ( 9- 5, 78.7) 5-19 -21.22 12.38 -0.05 1.06 -22.63
0 H Appoquinimink ( 6- 9, 79.2) 5-17 -20.70 12.91 -0.05 1.06 -22.08
0 A St Georges Tec ( 5-10, 74.8) 8-17 -25.05 8.55 0.05 1.06 -26.59
0 A Mt Pleasant ( 0-13, 66.3) 16-10 -33.61 1.00 0.05 1.06 1.12
0 H Hodgson Vo-Tec ( 8- 7, 74.5) 10-14 -25.39 8.21 -0.05 1.06 -27.07
0 H Mt Pleasant ( 0-13, 66.3) 13-11 -33.61 1.00 -0.05 1.06 1.01
0 H Newark ( 1-11, 69.2) 14- 8 -30.68 2.93 -0.05 1.06 3.06
------
-199.06
|
winning pts = 8.3532 losing points = -207.4114
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------