Wilmington Charter
W-L: ( 5-10) PR = 81.6181Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 325 A Appoquinimink ( 6- 9, 79.2) 8- 4 327 H Wilmington Friends (12- 5, 91.4) 2-17 331 A Dover ( 4-11, 76.1) 11- 6 403 A Padua Academy ( 4-11, 82.4) 14-12 408 H Newark Charter School ( 6- 9, 82.4) 6- 9 410 A Archmere Academy (10- 5, 91.5) 3-17 414 A Tatnall School (10- 5, 93.1) 3-19 416 A Caesar Rodney (12- 2, 95.7) 0-17 417 H Conrad School ( 4- 9, 74.1) 16- 2 428 H Middletown ( 5-10, 76.9) 16- 7 430 A Caravel Academy (10- 4, 90.3) 2-15 506 A Delaware Military Acad ( 8- 7, 81.1) 5- 7 508 H Tower Hill School (17- 1, 96.2) 1-23 513 A Ursuline Academy ( 4- 9, 84.0) 14-15 514 H Odessa (12- 4, 83.7) 8-11
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
325 A Appoquinimink 8- 4 4 2 1.64
327 H Wilmington Friends 2-17 -15 -10 0.00
331 A Dover 11- 6 5 5 0.00
403 A Padua Academy 14-12 2 -1 + 2.79
408 H Newark Charter School 6- 9 -3 -1 - -2.27
410 A Archmere Academy 3-17 -14 -10 0.00
414 A Tatnall School 3-19 -16 -12 0.00
416 A Caesar Rodney 0-17 -17 -14 0.00
417 H Conrad School 16- 2 14 8 0.00
428 H Middletown 16- 7 9 5 0.19
430 A Caravel Academy 2-15 -13 -9 0.00
506 A Delaware Military Acad 5- 7 -2 0 - -2.48
508 H Tower Hill School 1-23 -22 -14 0.00
513 A Ursuline Academy 14-15 -1 -2 1.48
514 H Odessa 8-11 -3 -2 -0.93
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 408 H Newark Charter School 6- 9 -3 -1 - -2.27 506 A Delaware Military Acad 5- 7 -2 0 - -2.48 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 403 A Padua Academy 14-12 2 -1 + 2.79 |
Wilmington Charter Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glasglow | Glasglow | Glasglow | ||
| Appoquinimink | Wilmington Charter | Wilmington Charter | ||
| Archmere Academy | Archmere Academy | Archmere Academy | ||
| Brandywine | Wilmington Charter | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) | Wilmington Charter | |
| Caesar Rodney | Caesar Rodney | Caesar Rodney | ||
| Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 5- 0 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Caravel Academy | Caravel Academy | Caravel Academy | ||
| Christiana | Wilmington Charter | Wilmington Charter 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Concord | Concord | insuffient: ( 2- 4)( 3- 3) | Concord | |
| Conrad School | Wilmington Charter | Wilmington Charter | ||
| Delaware Military Academ | Delaware Military Academ | Delaware Military Academ | ||
| Dover | Wilmington Charter | Wilmington Charter | ||
| Hodgson Vo-Tech | Wilmington Charter | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Wilmington Charter | |
| Indian River | Indian River | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 2) | Indian River | |
| Lake Forest | Wilmington Charter | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Wilmington Charter | |
| Middletown | Wilmington Charter | Wilmington Charter | ||
| Milford | Milford | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 2) | Milford | |
| Mt Pleasant | Wilmington Charter | Wilmington Charter 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Newark | Wilmington Charter | Wilmington Charter 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Newark Charter School | Newark Charter School | Newark Charter School | ||
| Odessa | Odessa | Odessa | ||
| Padua Academy | Wilmington Charter | Wilmington Charter | ||
| Polytech | Wilmington Charter | Wilmington Charter 4- 3 vs 0- 7 | ||
| Sanford School | Sanford School | Sanford School 5- 5 vs 2- 8 | ||
| Smyrna | Smyrna | Smyrna 6- 2 vs 4- 4 | ||
| St Andrews | St Andrews | St Andrews 4- 3 vs 2- 5 | ||
| St Georges Tech | Wilmington Charter | Wilmington Charter 4- 2 vs 0- 6 | ||
| St Marks | St Marks | insuffient: ( 4- 5)( 5- 4) | St Marks | |
| Sussex Academy | Sussex Academy | Sussex Academy 3- 3 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Sussex Tech | Sussex Tech | Sussex Tech | ||
| Tatnall School | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Ursuline Academy | Ursuline Academy | Ursuline Academy | ||
| Wilmington Friends | Wilmington Friends | Wilmington Friends |
PowerWise = 13
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.83
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Appoquinimink ( 6- 9, 79.2) 8- 4 -20.70 12.91 0.05 0.92 11.95
0 H Wilmington Fri (12- 5, 91.4) 2-17 -8.53 25.07 -0.05 0.92 -7.92
0 A Dover ( 4-11, 76.1) 11- 6 -23.77 9.84 0.05 0.92 9.12
0 A Padua Academy ( 4-11, 82.4) 14-12 -17.54 16.06 0.05 0.92 14.86
0 H Newark Charter ( 6- 9, 82.4) 6- 9 -17.50 16.11 -0.05 0.92 -16.18
0 A Archmere Acade (10- 5, 91.5) 3-17 -8.36 25.25 0.05 0.92 -7.66
0 A Tatnall School (10- 5, 93.1) 3-19 -6.80 26.81 0.05 0.92 -6.22
0 A Caesar Rodney (12- 2, 95.7) 0-17 -4.18 29.43 0.05 0.92 -3.80
0 H Conrad School ( 4- 9, 74.1) 16- 2 -25.81 7.80 -0.05 0.92 7.14
0 H Middletown ( 5-10, 76.9) 16- 7 -23.04 10.57 -0.05 0.92 9.69
0 A Caravel Academ (10- 4, 90.3) 2-15 -9.61 24.00 0.05 0.92 -8.81
0 A Delaware Milit ( 8- 7, 81.1) 5- 7 -18.81 14.79 0.05 0.92 -17.29
0 H Tower Hill Sch (17- 1, 96.2) 1-23 -3.74 29.86 -0.05 0.92 -3.50
0 A Ursuline Acade ( 4- 9, 84.0) 14-15 -15.85 17.75 0.05 0.92 -14.56
0 H Odessa (12- 4, 83.7) 8-11 -16.16 17.45 -0.05 0.92 -14.95
------
-48.13
|
winning pts = 52.7563 losing points = -100.8862
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------