Cedar Park
W-L: ( 6- 5) PR = 84.6982Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 203 A Austin ( 5- 6, 88.2) 1-13 208 A Alamo Heights (11- 0, 88.7) 7-11 208 A TMI Episcopal ( 3- 9, 80.9) 16- 7 213 H Vandegrift ( 3- 7, 85.3) 6- 5 306 H Regents School Austin ( 1- 8, 76.8) 14- 3 326 H Westwood (10- 3, 88.6) 1- 7 402 H LASA ( 5- 4, 82.1) 17-10 410 H Bowie ( 5- 8, 82.7) 12-11 417 A Lake Travis ( 3-10, 84.2) 9-12 510 N Bridge LC ( 7- 5, 83.6) 10- 8 511 N Alamo Heights (11- 0, 88.7) 9-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
203 A Austin 1-13 -12 -4 -0.54
208 A Alamo Heights 7-11 -4 -5 0.89
208 A TMI Episcopal 16- 7 9 3 + 2.16
213 H Vandegrift 6- 5 1 0 0.67
306 H Regents School Austin 14- 3 11 9 0.00
326 H Westwood 1- 7 -6 -3 - -2.04
402 H LASA 17-10 7 3 1.50
410 H Bowie 12-11 1 3 -1.88
417 A Lake Travis 9-12 -3 0 - -2.62
510 N Bridge LC 10- 8 2 1 0.88
511 N Alamo Heights 9-12 -3 -4 0.97
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 326 H Westwood 1- 7 -6 -3 - -2.04 417 A Lake Travis 9-12 -3 0 - -2.62 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 208 A TMI Episcopal 16- 7 9 3 + 2.16 |
Cedar Park Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alamo Heights | Alamo Heights | Alamo Heights | ||
| Allen | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Anderson | Anderson | Anderson 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Antonian College Prep | Cedar Park | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) | Cedar Park | |
| Atascocita | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Austin | Austin | Austin | ||
| Awty International | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Bellaire | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Bishop Lynch | Cedar Park | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cedar Park | |
| Boerne | Cedar Park | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Cedar Park | |
| Bowie | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Bridge LC | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Canyon | Cedar Park | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) | Cedar Park | |
| Clear Springs | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Coppell | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Cy-Fair | Cy-Fair | Cy-Fair | ||
| Dripping Springs | Dripping Springs | insuffient: ( 4- 3)( 5- 2) | Dripping Springs | |
| Duchesne Academy | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Emery-Weiner School | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Episcopal Dallas | Episcopal Dallas | Episcopal Dallas | ||
| Episcopal Houston | Episcopal Houston | Episcopal Houston | ||
| Flower Mound | Flower Mound | Flower Mound | ||
| Friendswood | Friendswood | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Friendswood | |
| Frisco | Frisco | Frisco | ||
| Grapevine | Cedar Park | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Cedar Park | |
| Greenhill School | Cedar Park | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cedar Park | |
| Highland Park | Highland Park | Highland Park | ||
| Hockaday | Hockaday | Hockaday | ||
| Houston Christian | Houston Christian | Houston Christian | ||
| John Paul II | Cedar Park | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cedar Park | |
| Katy | Katy | Katy | ||
| Keller | Keller | Keller | ||
| Kingwood | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Kinkaid School | Kinkaid School | Kinkaid School | ||
| Klein | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Lake Travis | Lake Travis | Lake Travis | ||
| Lamar | Lamar | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Lamar | |
| LASA | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Lovejoy | Lovejoy | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Lovejoy | |
| McKinney | McKinney | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | McKinney | |
| Memorial Houston | Memorial Houston | Memorial Houston | ||
| Parish Episcopal | Cedar Park | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Cedar Park | |
| Plano | Cedar Park | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cedar Park | |
| Prosper | Prosper | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Prosper | |
| Reagan | Cedar Park | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Cedar Park | |
| Regents School Austin | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Rockwall | Rockwall | Rockwall | ||
| Smithson Valley | Smithson Valley | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Smithson Valley | |
| Southlake Carroll | Southlake Carroll | Southlake Carroll | ||
| St Agnes Academy | St Agnes Academy | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Agnes Academy | |
| St Andrews ES | St Andrews ES | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | St Andrews ES | |
| St Francis | St Francis | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Francis | |
| St Johns | St Johns | St Johns | ||
| St Marys Hall | Cedar Park | Cedar Park 4- 1 vs 0- 5 | ||
| St Michaels Academy | St Michaels Academy | St Michaels Academy 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| St Pius X | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| St Stephens ES | St Stephens ES | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | St Stephens ES | |
| Stratford | Stratford | Stratford | ||
| TMI Episcopal | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Ursuline Academy | Ursuline Academy | Ursuline Academy | ||
| Vandegrift | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Village School | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Westlake | Westlake | Westlake 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Westwood | Westwood | Westwood | ||
| Woodlands | Woodlands | Woodlands |
PowerWise = 29
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 11.27
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Austin ( 5- 6, 88.2) 1-13 -11.66 12.57 0.91 1.02 -11.01
0 A Alamo Heights (11- 0, 88.7) 7-11 -11.23 12.99 0.91 1.02 -10.57
0 A TMI Episcopal ( 3- 9, 80.9) 16- 7 -18.96 5.27 0.91 1.02 6.33
0 H Vandegrift ( 3- 7, 85.3) 6- 5 -14.61 9.61 -0.91 1.02 8.91
0 H Regents School ( 1- 8, 76.8) 14- 3 -23.06 1.16 -0.91 1.02 0.26
0 H Westwood (10- 3, 88.6) 1- 7 -11.33 12.90 -0.91 1.02 -12.54
0 H LASA ( 5- 4, 82.1) 17-10 -17.79 6.44 -0.91 1.02 5.66
0 H Bowie ( 5- 8, 82.7) 12-11 -17.17 7.05 -0.91 1.02 6.29
0 A Lake Travis ( 3-10, 84.2) 9-12 -15.74 8.49 0.91 1.02 -15.19
0 N Bridge LC ( 7- 5, 83.6) 10- 8 -16.32 7.91 -0.00 1.02 8.10
0 N Alamo Heights (11- 0, 88.7) 9-12 -11.23 12.99 -0.00 1.02 -11.51
------
-25.27
|
winning pts = 35.5607 losing points = -60.8285
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------