Centennial
W-L: (10- 3) PR = 89.3092Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 225 A Pope John Paul II ( 1-14, 84.1) 19- 4 320 H Hillsboro ( 1- 7, 77.6) 21- 1 322 H St Georges ( 5- 7, 86.2) 14- 8 325 A University School Nash (11- 7, 88.0) 13- 6 327 H Green Hill ( 2- 8, 77.4) 22- 3 330 H Houston ( 9- 7, 90.7) 14-13 409 A Franklin Road Academy ( 5- 6, 87.0) 8- 9 411 A Hillsboro ( 1- 7, 77.6) 18- 5 415 H Page ( 9- 7, 91.6) 8-18 417 A Upperman ( 1- 7, 76.2) 16- 0 422 H Hunters Lane ( 0- 6, 73.1) 21- 0 502 A Soddy Daisy ( 8- 6, 84.1) 19- 3 509 A Page ( 9- 7, 91.6) 4-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
225 A Pope John Paul II 19- 4 15 5 0.32
320 H Hillsboro 21- 1 20 12 0.00
322 H St Georges 14- 8 6 4 1.33
325 A University School Nash 13- 6 7 1 ++ 4.27
327 H Green Hill 22- 3 19 12 0.00
330 H Houston 14-13 1 -1 1.86
409 A Franklin Road Academy 8- 9 -1 2 - -2.76
411 A Hillsboro 18- 5 13 11 0.00
415 H Page 8-18 -10 -2 - -3.24
417 A Upperman 16- 0 16 13 0.00
422 H Hunters Lane 21- 0 21 17 0.00
502 A Soddy Daisy 19- 3 16 5 0.36
509 A Page 4-12 -8 -3 - -2.12
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 409 A Franklin Road Academy 8- 9 -1 2 - -2.76 415 H Page 8-18 -10 -2 - -3.24 509 A Page 4-12 -8 -3 - -2.12 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 325 A University School Nash 13- 6 7 1 ++ 4.27 |
Centennial Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arlington | Centennial | Centennial 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Bartlett | Centennial | Centennial 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Baylor School | Baylor School | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Baylor School | |
| Bearden | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Centennial | |
| Bradley Central | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| Brentwood | Brentwood | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Brentwood | |
| Briarcrest Christian | Briarcrest Christian | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Briarcrest Christian | |
| Christ Presbyterian Acad | Centennial | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) | Centennial | |
| Christian Academy Knoxvi | Centennial | tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) | Centennial | |
| Collierville | Collierville | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | Collierville | |
| Cookeville | Cookeville | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Cookeville | |
| Dobyns Bennett | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Ensworth | Ensworth | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Ensworth | |
| Evangelical Christian | Evangelical Christian | insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) | Evangelical Christian | |
| Farragut | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Father Ryan | Father Ryan | Father Ryan 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Franklin | Franklin | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Franklin | |
| Franklin Road Academy | Franklin Road Academy | Franklin Road Academy | ||
| Gatlinburg Pittman | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Centennial | |
| Girls Preparatory School | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Centennial | |
| Green Hill | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Harpeth Hall | Harpeth Hall | Harpeth Hall 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Heritage | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Hillsboro | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Houston | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Hunters Lane | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Hutchison School | Hutchison School | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Hutchison School | |
| Independence | Centennial | insuffient: ( 5- 1)( 6- 0) | Centennial | |
| Knoxville Catholic | Centennial | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Centennial | |
| Lausanne Collegiate | Centennial | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) | Centennial | |
| Maryville | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Centennial | |
| Ooltewah | Centennial | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | Centennial | |
| Page | Page | Page | ||
| Pigeon Forge | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Pope John Paul II | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Ravenwood | Ravenwood | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Ravenwood | |
| Science Hill | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Sevier County | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Seymour | Seymour | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Seymour | |
| Signal Mountain | Centennial | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Centennial | |
| Soddy Daisy | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| St Agnes Academy | Centennial | Centennial 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| St Benedict | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| St Cecilia Academy | Centennial | Centennial 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| St Georges | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| St Marys Episcopal | St Marys Episcopal | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | St Marys Episcopal | |
| Summit | Centennial | insuffient: ( 6- 1)( 5- 2) | Centennial | |
| University School Nashvi | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Upperman | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Walker Valley | Centennial | Centennial 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Webb School Bell Buckle | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Webb School Knoxville | Centennial | Centennial 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| West | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| White Station | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Centennial | |
| William Blount | Centennial | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Centennial | |
| Wilson Central | Centennial | Centennial |
PowerWise = 40
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 12.88
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Pope John Paul ( 1-14, 84.1) 19- 4 -15.83 10.99 0.56 0.99 11.44
0 H Hillsboro ( 1- 7, 77.6) 21- 1 -22.32 4.50 -0.56 0.99 3.90
0 H St Georges ( 5- 7, 86.2) 14- 8 -13.70 13.12 -0.56 0.99 12.44
0 A University Sch (11- 7, 88.0) 13- 6 -11.88 14.94 0.56 0.99 15.35
0 H Green Hill ( 2- 8, 77.4) 22- 3 -22.51 4.31 -0.56 0.99 3.71
0 H Houston ( 9- 7, 90.7) 14-13 -9.16 17.66 -0.56 0.99 16.93
0 A Franklin Road ( 5- 6, 87.0) 8- 9 -12.92 13.91 0.56 0.99 -12.24
0 A Hillsboro ( 1- 7, 77.6) 18- 5 -22.32 4.50 0.56 0.99 5.02
0 H Page ( 9- 7, 91.6) 8-18 -8.27 18.55 -0.56 0.99 -8.75
0 A Upperman ( 1- 7, 76.2) 16- 0 -23.68 3.15 0.56 0.99 3.67
0 H Hunters Lane ( 0- 6, 73.1) 21- 0 -26.80 1.00 -0.56 0.99 0.43
0 A Soddy Daisy ( 8- 6, 84.1) 19- 3 -15.80 11.02 0.56 0.99 11.48
0 A Page ( 9- 7, 91.6) 4-12 -8.27 18.55 0.56 0.99 -7.64
------
55.76
|
winning pts = 84.3824 losing points = -28.6229
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------