Centennial
W-L: ( 1- 7) PR = 89.3287
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
304 H Capital ( 1- 9, 89.1) 12- 5
311 H Rocky Mountain ( 7- 5, 94.5) 2-14
405 H Idaho Falls ( 6- 5, 94.3) 6-14
410 H Owyhee ( 6- 7, 92.7) 4- 8
414 A Timberline ( 7- 5, 94.2) 3-17
417 H Bishop Kelly ( 6- 7, 94.2) 2-11
426 A Teton Valley ( 6- 5, 93.7) 3-15
508 A Vallivue ( 5- 6, 92.6) 5-16
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
304 H Capital 12- 5 7 1 ++ 4.17
311 H Rocky Mountain 2-14 -12 -5 -0.41
405 H Idaho Falls 6-14 -8 -4 -0.68
410 H Owyhee 4- 8 -4 -3 -1.20
414 A Timberline 3-17 -14 -6 0.00
417 H Bishop Kelly 2-11 -9 -4 -0.75
426 A Teton Valley 3-15 -12 -5 -0.01
508 A Vallivue 5-16 -11 -4 -1.13
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
304 H Capital 12- 5 7 1 ++ 4.17
|
Centennial Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
Bishop Kelly |
Bishop Kelly |
Bishop Kelly |
 
| |
Boise |
Boise |
|
Boise   6- 0 vs 1- 5 |
|
Capital |
Centennial |
Centennial |
 
| |
Eagle |
Eagle |
|
Eagle   6- 1 vs 0- 7 |
|
Idaho Falls |
Idaho Falls |
Idaho Falls |
 
| |
Middleton |
Middleton |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 6)( 2- 5) |
Middleton |
Mountain View |
Mountain View |
|
Mountain View   6- 0 vs 0- 6 |
|
Owyhee |
Owyhee |
Owyhee |
 
| |
Rocky Mountain |
Rocky Mountain |
Rocky Mountain |
 
| |
Sun Valley |
Sun Valley |
|
tied - ( 1- 5) ( 1- 5) |
Sun Valley |
Teton Valley |
Teton Valley |
Teton Valley |
 
| |
Timberline |
Timberline |
Timberline |
 
| |
Vallivue |
Vallivue |
Vallivue |
 
| |
PowerWise = 1

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 11.43
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Capital ( 1- 9, 89.1) 12- 5 -10.79 1.00 -0.61 1.43 0.56
0 H Rocky Mountain ( 7- 5, 94.5) 2-14 -5.37 5.90 -0.61 1.43 -8.55
0 H Idaho Falls ( 6- 5, 94.3) 6-14 -5.64 5.63 -0.61 1.43 -8.92
0 H Owyhee ( 6- 7, 92.7) 4- 8 -7.16 4.11 -0.61 1.43 -11.10
0 A Timberline ( 7- 5, 94.2) 3-17 -5.66 5.61 0.61 1.43 -7.22
0 H Bishop Kelly ( 6- 7, 94.2) 2-11 -5.71 5.56 -0.61 1.43 -9.03
0 A Teton Valley ( 6- 5, 93.7) 3-15 -6.19 5.08 0.61 1.43 -7.97
0 A Vallivue ( 5- 6, 92.6) 5-16 -7.31 3.96 0.61 1.43 -9.57
------
-61.80
|
winning pts = 0.5566 losing points = -62.3584
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------