Cedarburg
W-L: ( 8- 5) PR = 89.5049Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 402 H Wauwatosa ( 1-16, 81.9) 19- 2 411 H Kenosha ( 8- 7, 89.9) 11- 6 414 H West Bend ( 4- 8, 86.8) 10- 7 422 A Divine Savior ( 9- 7, 90.7) 7-14 423 H Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 18- 5 428 A Whitefish Bay (15- 4, 93.6) 8-13 505 A West Bend ( 4- 8, 86.8) 11- 8 509 H Oak Creek ( 3-11, 83.0) 19- 1 512 A Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 16- 5 512 A Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 16- 5 519 H Whitefish Bay (15- 4, 93.6) 6-12 519 A Whitefish Bay (15- 4, 93.6) 7-12 529 A Mukwonago (13- 6, 92.9) 11-15
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
402 H Wauwatosa 19- 2 17 8 0.00
411 H Kenosha 11- 6 5 0 ++ 4.77
414 H West Bend 10- 7 3 3 -0.30
422 A Divine Savior 7-14 -7 -2 - -3.15
423 H Homestead 18- 5 13 7 0.00
428 A Whitefish Bay 8-13 -5 -5 -0.33
505 A West Bend 11- 8 3 2 0.91
509 H Oak Creek 19- 1 18 7 0.00
512 A Homestead 16- 5 11 5 0.00
512 A Homestead 16- 5 11 5 0.00
519 H Whitefish Bay 6-12 -6 -3 -1.54
519 A Whitefish Bay 7-12 -5 -5 -0.33
529 A Mukwonago 11-15 -4 -4 -0.03
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 422 A Divine Savior 7-14 -7 -2 - -3.15 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 411 H Kenosha 11- 6 5 0 ++ 4.77 |
Cedarburg Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appleton | Cedarburg | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Cedarburg | |
| Arrowhead | Arrowhead | Arrowhead 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Bay Port | Cedarburg | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Cedarburg | |
| Brookfield | Brookfield | Brookfield 5- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Central Wisconsin | Cedarburg | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Cedarburg | |
| De Pere | Cedarburg | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Cedarburg | |
| DeForest | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Divine Savior | Divine Savior | Divine Savior | ||
| Franklin | Cedarburg | insuffient: ( 4- 2)( 5- 1) | Cedarburg | |
| Hamilton | Cedarburg | Cedarburg 3- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Homestead | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Hudson | Hudson | Hudson | ||
| Janesville | Cedarburg | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cedarburg | |
| Kenosha | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Kettle Moraine | |
| Kimberly | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Madison | Madison | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Madison | |
| Middleton | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Mukwonago | Mukwonago | Mukwonago | ||
| Muskego | Muskego | insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 4- 2) | Muskego | |
| Neenah | Cedarburg | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Cedarburg | |
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | Notre Dame | ||
| Oak Creek | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Oconomowoc | Oconomowoc | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Oconomowoc | |
| Oregon | Oregon | Oregon | ||
| Pulaski | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Sun Prairie | Cedarburg | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cedarburg | |
| Superior | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| University Milwaukee | University Milwaukee | University Milwaukee 5- 0 vs 3- 2 | ||
| Verona | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Waukesha | Cedarburg | insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 4) | Cedarburg | |
| Waunakee | Cedarburg | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Cedarburg | |
| Wauwatosa | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| West Bend | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Whitefish Bay | Whitefish Bay | Whitefish Bay |
PowerWise = 22
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.72
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Wauwatosa ( 1-16, 81.9) 19- 2 -17.98 2.92 -0.60 1.21 2.80
0 H Kenosha ( 8- 7, 89.9) 11- 6 -10.02 10.88 -0.60 1.21 12.43
0 H West Bend ( 4- 8, 86.8) 10- 7 -13.09 7.81 -0.60 1.21 8.72
0 A Divine Savior ( 9- 7, 90.7) 7-14 -9.15 11.75 0.60 1.21 -10.34
0 H Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 18- 5 -16.32 4.58 -0.60 1.21 4.81
0 A Whitefish Bay (15- 4, 93.6) 8-13 -6.33 14.57 0.60 1.21 -6.92
0 A West Bend ( 4- 8, 86.8) 11- 8 -13.09 7.81 0.60 1.21 10.18
0 H Oak Creek ( 3-11, 83.0) 19- 1 -16.90 4.01 -0.60 1.21 4.11
0 A Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 16- 5 -16.32 4.58 0.60 1.21 6.27
0 A Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 16- 5 -16.32 4.58 0.60 1.21 6.27
0 H Whitefish Bay (15- 4, 93.6) 6-12 -6.33 14.57 -0.60 1.21 -8.38
0 A Whitefish Bay (15- 4, 93.6) 7-12 -6.33 14.57 0.60 1.21 -6.92
0 A Mukwonago (13- 6, 92.9) 11-15 -7.03 13.87 0.60 1.21 -7.77
------
15.25
|
winning pts = 55.5920 losing points = -40.3400
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------