Bridge LC
W-L: ( 7- 5) PR = 83.5825Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 228 H John Paul II ( 4- 6, 81.4) 12- 5 301 H Plano ( 4- 7, 80.8) 10- 4 303 A McKinney ( 6- 7, 86.8) 10-12 306 A Grapevine ( 6- 2, 83.7) 4-12 324 A Bishop Lynch ( 2- 4, 80.3) 14- 6 326 A Greenhill School ( 2-10, 78.7) 14- 7 328 H Greenhill School ( 2-10, 78.7) 20- 7 402 A John Paul II ( 4- 6, 81.4) 13-14 405 A Plano ( 4- 7, 80.8) 8- 5 412 H Grapevine ( 6- 2, 83.7) 12-13 430 H John Paul II ( 4- 6, 81.4) 13-11 510 N Cedar Park ( 6- 5, 84.7) 8-10
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
228 H John Paul II 12- 5 7 3 1.90
301 H Plano 10- 4 6 4 1.26
303 A McKinney 10-12 -2 -4 + 2.13
306 A Grapevine 4-12 -8 -1 - -3.97
324 A Bishop Lynch 14- 6 8 2 + 2.64
326 A Greenhill School 14- 7 7 4 0.99
328 H Greenhill School 20- 7 13 6 0.00
402 A John Paul II 13-14 -1 1 - -2.27
405 A Plano 8- 5 3 2 1.08
412 H Grapevine 12-13 -1 1 -1.80
430 H John Paul II 13-11 2 3 -1.10
510 N Cedar Park 8-10 -2 -1 -0.88
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 306 A Grapevine 4-12 -8 -1 - -3.97 402 A John Paul II 13-14 -1 1 - -2.27 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 303 A McKinney 10-12 -2 -4 + 2.13 324 A Bishop Lynch 14- 6 8 2 + 2.64 |
Bridge LC Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alamo Heights | Alamo Heights | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Alamo Heights | |
| Allen | Allen | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Allen | |
| Anderson | Anderson | Anderson | ||
| Antonian College Prep | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Atascocita | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Austin | Austin | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Austin | |
| Awty International | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Bellaire | Bellaire | Bellaire | ||
| Bishop Lynch | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Boerne | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Bowie | Bridge LC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bridge LC | |
| Canyon | Canyon | Canyon | ||
| Cedar Park | Cedar Park | Cedar Park | ||
| Clear Springs | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Coppell | Bridge LC | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 1) | Bridge LC | |
| Cy-Fair | Cy-Fair | Cy-Fair | ||
| Dripping Springs | Dripping Springs | Dripping Springs | ||
| Duchesne Academy | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Emery-Weiner School | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Episcopal Dallas | Episcopal Dallas | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Episcopal Dallas | |
| Episcopal Houston | Episcopal Houston | Episcopal Houston | ||
| Flower Mound | Flower Mound | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Flower Mound | |
| Friendswood | Friendswood | Friendswood | ||
| Frisco | Frisco | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Frisco | |
| Grapevine | Grapevine | Grapevine | ||
| Greenhill School | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Highland Park | Highland Park | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Highland Park | |
| Hockaday | Hockaday | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Hockaday | |
| Houston Christian | Houston Christian | Houston Christian | ||
| John Paul II | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Katy | Katy | Katy | ||
| Keller | Keller | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Keller | |
| Kingwood | Kingwood | Kingwood | ||
| Kinkaid School | Kinkaid School | Kinkaid School | ||
| Klein | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Lake Travis | Lake Travis | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Lake Travis | |
| Lamar | Lamar | Lamar | ||
| LASA | Bridge LC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bridge LC | |
| Lovejoy | Lovejoy | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Lovejoy | |
| McKinney | McKinney | McKinney | ||
| Memorial Houston | Memorial Houston | Memorial Houston | ||
| Parish Episcopal | Bridge LC | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) | Bridge LC | |
| Plano | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Prosper | Prosper | Prosper | ||
| Reagan | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Regents School Austin | Bridge LC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bridge LC | |
| Rockwall | Rockwall | Rockwall | ||
| Smithson Valley | Smithson Valley | Smithson Valley | ||
| Southlake Carroll | Southlake Carroll | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Southlake Carroll | |
| St Agnes Academy | St Agnes Academy | St Agnes Academy | ||
| St Andrews ES | St Andrews ES | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | St Andrews ES | |
| St Francis | St Francis | St Francis | ||
| St Johns | St Johns | St Johns | ||
| St Marys Hall | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| St Michaels Academy | St Michaels Academy | St Michaels Academy | ||
| St Pius X | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| St Stephens ES | St Stephens ES | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | St Stephens ES | |
| Stratford | Stratford | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Stratford | |
| TMI Episcopal | Bridge LC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bridge LC | |
| Ursuline Academy | Ursuline Academy | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Ursuline Academy | |
| Vandegrift | Vandegrift | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Vandegrift | |
| Village School | Bridge LC | Bridge LC | ||
| Westlake | Westlake | Westlake | ||
| Westwood | Westwood | Westwood 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Woodlands | Woodlands | Woodlands |
PowerWise = 22
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 11.27
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H John Paul II ( 4- 6, 81.4) 12- 5 -18.50 5.72 -0.91 0.94 4.52
0 H Plano ( 4- 7, 80.8) 10- 4 -19.15 5.08 -0.91 0.94 3.91
0 A McKinney ( 6- 7, 86.8) 10-12 -13.10 11.12 0.91 0.94 -11.45
0 A Grapevine ( 6- 2, 83.7) 4-12 -16.20 8.02 0.91 0.94 -14.36
0 A Bishop Lynch ( 2- 4, 80.3) 14- 6 -19.59 4.64 0.91 0.94 5.21
0 A Greenhill Scho ( 2-10, 78.7) 14- 7 -21.24 2.98 0.91 0.94 3.66
0 H Greenhill Scho ( 2-10, 78.7) 20- 7 -21.24 2.98 -0.91 0.94 1.94
0 A John Paul II ( 4- 6, 81.4) 13-14 -18.50 5.72 0.91 0.94 -16.52
0 A Plano ( 4- 7, 80.8) 8- 5 -19.15 5.08 0.91 0.94 5.63
0 H Grapevine ( 6- 2, 83.7) 12-13 -16.20 8.02 -0.91 0.94 -16.08
0 H John Paul II ( 4- 6, 81.4) 13-11 -18.50 5.72 -0.91 0.94 4.52
0 N Cedar Park ( 6- 5, 84.7) 8-10 -15.20 9.02 -0.00 0.94 -14.28
------
-43.30
|
winning pts = 29.3879 losing points = -72.6928
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------