Bow
W-L: (14- 4) PR = 91.0552Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 A Concord Christian ( 2-12, 79.1) 19- 1 416 A Laconia (11- 5, 87.9) 15- 2 417 A Gilford (13- 3, 93.5) 7- 6 421 H Hopkinton (15- 3, 91.5) 8-14 423 A St Thomas Aquinas (17- 1, 95.8) 8-16 508 H Kearsarge ( 7- 8, 82.9) 15- 3 512 H Pembroke Academy ( 2-12, 78.2) 18- 3 514 A Coe-Brown ( 9- 7, 87.7) 13- 8 515 H Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 10- 9 516 H Inter-Lakes-Moultonbor ( 1-13, 76.5) 19- 1 519 H John Stark (13- 3, 87.7) 7- 9 521 H Bishop Brady ( 3- 9, 82.5) 13- 3 523 A ConVal ( 6-10, 81.6) 18- 4 528 A Pelham ( 7- 8, 85.7) 16- 9 530 H Milford ( 1-12, 79.3) 18- 0 603 H Kearsarge ( 7- 8, 82.9) 18- 3 605 A John Stark (13- 3, 87.7) 16- 8 607 N St Thomas Aquinas (17- 1, 95.8) 6-17
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 A Concord Christian 19- 1 18 12 0.00
416 A Laconia 15- 2 13 3 + 2.03
417 A Gilford 7- 6 1 -3 + 3.64
421 H Hopkinton 8-14 -6 0 -- -4.67
423 A St Thomas Aquinas 8-16 -8 -5 -0.08
508 H Kearsarge 15- 3 12 8 0.00
512 H Pembroke Academy 18- 3 15 13 0.00
514 A Coe-Brown 13- 8 5 3 1.83
515 H Londonderry 10- 9 1 0 1.13
516 H Inter-Lakes-Moultonbor 19- 1 18 15 0.00
519 H John Stark 7- 9 -2 4 -- -5.51
521 H Bishop Brady 13- 3 10 9 0.00
523 A ConVal 18- 4 14 9 0.00
528 A Pelham 16- 9 7 5 0.00
530 H Milford 18- 0 18 12 0.00
603 H Kearsarge 18- 3 15 8 0.00
605 A John Stark 16- 8 8 3 1.80
607 N St Thomas Aquinas 6-17 -11 -5 -0.24
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 421 H Hopkinton 8-14 -6 0 -- -4.67 519 H John Stark 7- 9 -2 4 -- -5.51 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 416 A Laconia 15- 2 13 3 + 2.03 417 A Gilford 7- 6 1 -3 + 3.64 |
Bow Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Bow | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bow | |
| Bedford | Bedford | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bedford | |
| Belmont | Bow | Bow 9- 2 vs 0-10 | ||
| Bishop Brady | Bow | Bow | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bishop Guertin | |
| Campbell | Bow | Bow 9- 2 vs 3- 7 | ||
| Coe-Brown | Bow | Bow | ||
| Concord | Bow | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bow | |
| Concord Christian | Bow | Bow | ||
| ConVal | Bow | Bow | ||
| Derryfield | Bow | tied - ( 9- 2) ( 9- 2) | Bow | |
| Dover | Bow | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bow | |
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Exeter HS | |
| Gilford | Bow | Bow | ||
| Goffstown | Bow | Bow | ||
| Hanover | Bow | Bow | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Bow | Bow | ||
| Hopkinton | Hopkinton | Hopkinton | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonborou | Bow | Bow | ||
| John Stark | Bow | insuffient: ( 8- 1)( 7- 2) | Bow | |
| Kearsarge | Bow | Bow | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Bow | Bow | ||
| Kennett | Bow | Bow | ||
| Kingswood | Bow | Bow | ||
| Laconia | Bow | Bow | ||
| Lebanon | Bow | Bow 10- 2 vs 7- 5 | ||
| Londonderry | Bow | Bow | ||
| Manchester Central-West | Bow | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bow | |
| Manchester Memorial | Bow | Bow | ||
| Merrimack | Bow | Bow | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Bow | Bow | ||
| Milford | Bow | Bow | ||
| Nashua North | Bow | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bow | |
| Nashua South | Nashua South | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Nashua South | |
| Oyster River-Newmarket | Bow | Bow | ||
| Pelham | Bow | Bow | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Bow | Bow | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Plymouth | Bow | Bow 10- 1 vs 5- 5 | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Portsmouth | |
| Salem | Bow | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bow | |
| Souhegan | Souhegan | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Souhegan | |
| Spaulding | Bow | Bow | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Timberlane | Bow | Bow | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Bow | Bow 10- 2 vs 4- 6 | ||
| Windham | Bow | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bow | |
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Winnacunnet |
PowerWise = 38
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.96
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Concord Christ ( 2-12, 79.1) 19- 1 -20.81 7.12 0.16 0.89 6.45
0 A Laconia (11- 5, 87.9) 15- 2 -11.97 15.96 0.16 0.89 14.29
0 A Gilford (13- 3, 93.5) 7- 6 -6.36 21.57 0.16 0.89 19.26
0 H Hopkinton (15- 3, 91.5) 8-14 -8.36 19.57 -0.16 0.89 -7.55
0 A St Thomas Aqui (17- 1, 95.8) 8-16 -4.08 23.84 0.16 0.89 -3.48
0 H Kearsarge ( 7- 8, 82.9) 15- 3 -16.99 10.93 -0.16 0.89 9.56
0 H Pembroke Acade ( 2-12, 78.2) 18- 3 -21.73 6.19 -0.16 0.89 5.35
0 A Coe-Brown ( 9- 7, 87.7) 13- 8 -12.17 15.75 0.16 0.89 14.11
0 H Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 10- 9 -8.55 19.37 -0.16 0.89 17.04
0 H Inter-Lakes-Mo ( 1-13, 76.5) 19- 1 -23.37 4.56 -0.16 0.89 3.90
0 H John Stark (13- 3, 87.7) 7- 9 -12.20 15.72 -0.16 0.89 -10.96
0 H Bishop Brady ( 3- 9, 82.5) 13- 3 -17.40 10.53 -0.16 0.89 9.19
0 A ConVal ( 6-10, 81.6) 18- 4 -18.29 9.63 0.16 0.89 8.68
0 A Pelham ( 7- 8, 85.7) 16- 9 -14.23 13.70 0.16 0.89 12.28
0 H Milford ( 1-12, 79.3) 18- 0 -20.61 7.32 -0.16 0.89 6.35
0 H Kearsarge ( 7- 8, 82.9) 18- 3 -16.99 10.93 -0.16 0.89 9.56
0 A John Stark (13- 3, 87.7) 16- 8 -12.20 15.72 0.16 0.89 14.08
0 N St Thomas Aqui (17- 1, 95.8) 6-17 -4.08 23.84 -0.00 0.89 -3.62
------
124.49
|
winning pts = 150.1035 losing points = -25.6128
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------