Boiling Springs
W-L: ( 3- 6) PR = 81.9128Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 227 A Hillcrest ( 0-12, 72.5) 24- 1 307 H Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 11- 5 325 H Wade Hampton ( 9- 6, 83.8) 20-22 328 A Spartanburg (14- 3, 91.3) 3-21 401 H Hillcrest ( 0-12, 72.5) 24- 2 404 H Byrnes (10- 7, 85.2) 10-19 414 A TL Hanna (16- 1, 88.6) 5-23 415 A Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 4-16 416 A Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 8-17
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
227 A Hillcrest 24- 1 23 9 0.00
307 H Eastside 11- 5 6 2 + 3.31
325 H Wade Hampton 20-22 -2 -1 -0.71
328 A Spartanburg 3-21 -18 -10 0.00
401 H Hillcrest 24- 2 22 10 0.00
404 H Byrnes 10-19 -9 -3 - -2.32
414 A TL Hanna 5-23 -18 -7 0.00
415 A Riverside 4-16 -12 -5 0.00
416 A Clover 8-17 -9 -5 -0.20
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 404 H Byrnes 10-19 -9 -3 - -2.32 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 307 H Eastside 11- 5 6 2 + 3.31 |
Boiling Springs Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | AC Flora | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | AC Flora | |
| Academic Magnet | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Aiken | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Ashley Hall | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Beaufort | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Bishop England | Bishop England | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bishop England | |
| Bluffton | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Blythewood | Boiling Springs | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Boiling Springs | |
| Byrnes | Byrnes | Byrnes | ||
| Carolina Forest | Carolina Forest | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Carolina Forest | |
| Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Chapin | Chapin | Chapin 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Christ Church Episcopal | Christ Church Episcopal | Christ Church Episcopal 3- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Clover | Clover | Clover | ||
| Dorman | Boiling Springs | insuffient: ( 2- 5)( 1- 6) | Boiling Springs | |
| Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) | Dutch Fork | |
| Eastside | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Fort Mill | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Fountain Inn | Boiling Springs | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Boiling Springs | |
| Greenville | Greenville | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Greenville | |
| Heathwood Hall | Heathwood Hall | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Heathwood Hall | |
| Hillcrest | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Hilton Head | Hilton Head | Hilton Head | ||
| Irmo | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| James Island | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 5- 1 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Legion Collegiate Academ | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Lexington | Lexington | Lexington 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | ||
| Mauldin | Boiling Springs | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 1- 4) | Boiling Springs | |
| May River | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Mid-Carolina | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Myrtle Beach | Boiling Springs | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Boiling Springs | |
| Nation Ford | Boiling Springs | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Boiling Springs | |
| North Myrtle Beach | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | ||
| Philip Simmons | Philip Simmons | Philip Simmons | ||
| Pinewood Prep | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | ||
| Ridge View | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| River Bluff | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | River Bluff | |
| Riverside | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Socastee | Socastee | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Socastee | |
| Spartanburg | Spartanburg | Spartanburg | ||
| Spring Valley | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| St James | St James | St James | ||
| St Josephs Catholic | Boiling Springs | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 0- 4) | Boiling Springs | |
| TL Hanna | TL Hanna | TL Hanna | ||
| Trinity Collegiate | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Waccamaw | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Wade Hampton | Wade Hampton | Wade Hampton | ||
| Wando | Wando | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Wando | |
| West Ashley | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Westside | Boiling Springs | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Boiling Springs | |
| White Knoll | Boiling Springs | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Boiling Springs | |
| Woodmont | Boiling Springs | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Boiling Springs |
PowerWise = 29
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.58
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Hillcrest ( 0-12, 72.5) 24- 1 -27.42 6.25 0.62 1.51 10.37
0 H Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 11- 5 -19.06 14.61 -0.62 1.51 21.11
0 H Wade Hampton ( 9- 6, 83.8) 20-22 -16.08 17.59 -0.62 1.51 -25.20
0 A Spartanburg (14- 3, 91.3) 3-21 -8.59 25.08 0.62 1.51 -12.03
0 H Hillcrest ( 0-12, 72.5) 24- 2 -27.42 6.25 -0.62 1.51 8.50
0 H Byrnes (10- 7, 85.2) 10-19 -14.69 18.98 -0.62 1.51 -23.10
0 A TL Hanna (16- 1, 88.6) 5-23 -11.30 22.37 0.62 1.51 -16.11
0 A Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 4-16 -13.17 20.50 0.62 1.51 -18.94
0 A Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 8-17 -13.80 19.86 0.62 1.51 -19.89
------
-75.29
|
winning pts = 39.9800 losing points = -115.2651
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------