Bishop Manogue
W-L: (11- 4) PR = 94.9397Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 305 H Reno ( 5-12, 86.0) 16- 6 306 A Spanish Springs ( 6- 8, 89.4) 15- 2 313 A Damonte Ranch ( 1-13, 85.1) 19- 0 401 A Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 12- 7 405 A Truckee-North Tahoe (16- 1, 97.9) 5-12 411 H Oasis Academy/Fallon ( 8- 8, 90.2) 16- 5 417 A Oasis Academy/Fallon ( 8- 8, 90.2) 14- 8 421 A Reno ( 5-12, 86.0) 14- 3 423 H Truckee-North Tahoe (16- 1, 97.9) 9-12 425 H Spanish Springs ( 6- 8, 89.4) 19- 6 428 A McQueen ( 4-11, 86.3) 12- 0 502 H Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 13-14 506 H Damonte Ranch ( 1-13, 85.1) 18- 5 507 H McQueen ( 4-11, 86.3) 20- 4 512 A Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 11-16
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
305 H Reno 16- 6 10 9 0.00
306 A Spanish Springs 15- 2 13 5 0.00
313 A Damonte Ranch 19- 0 19 9 0.00
401 A Galena 12- 7 5 -1 +++ 6.03
405 A Truckee-North Tahoe 5-12 -7 -3 -1.67
411 H Oasis Academy/Fallon 16- 5 11 5 0.00
417 A Oasis Academy/Fallon 14- 8 6 4 0.56
421 A Reno 14- 3 11 9 0.00
423 H Truckee-North Tahoe 9-12 -3 -3 -0.31
425 H Spanish Springs 19- 6 13 6 0.00
428 A McQueen 12- 0 12 8 0.00
502 H Galena 13-14 -1 0 -0.62
506 H Damonte Ranch 18- 5 13 10 0.00
507 H McQueen 20- 4 16 9 0.00
512 A Galena 11-16 -5 -1 - -3.97
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 512 A Galena 11-16 -5 -1 - -3.97 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 401 A Galena 12- 7 5 -1 +++ 6.03 |
Bishop Manogue Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) | Bishop Gorman | |
| Bishop Gorman II | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Centennial | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Coronado | Coronado | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) | Coronado | |
| Damonte Ranch | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Faith Lutheran | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Galena | Galena | Galena | ||
| McQueen | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Oasis Academy/Fallon | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| One Hill | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Palo Verde | Palo Verde | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 1) | Palo Verde | |
| Reed | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Reno | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Spanish Springs | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe |
PowerWise = 9
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.62
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Reno ( 5-12, 86.0) 16- 6 -13.85 2.40 -0.32 0.91 1.89
0 A Spanish Spring ( 6- 8, 89.4) 15- 2 -10.46 5.79 0.32 0.91 5.55
0 A Damonte Ranch ( 1-13, 85.1) 19- 0 -14.76 1.49 0.32 0.91 1.65
0 A Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 12- 7 -4.26 12.00 0.32 0.91 11.19
0 A Truckee-North (16- 1, 97.9) 5-12 -1.95 14.30 0.32 0.91 -1.48
0 H Oasis Academy/ ( 8- 8, 90.2) 16- 5 -9.72 6.53 -0.32 0.91 5.64
0 A Oasis Academy/ ( 8- 8, 90.2) 14- 8 -9.72 6.53 0.32 0.91 6.23
0 A Reno ( 5-12, 86.0) 14- 3 -13.85 2.40 0.32 0.91 2.47
0 H Truckee-North (16- 1, 97.9) 9-12 -1.95 14.30 -0.32 0.91 -2.07
0 H Spanish Spring ( 6- 8, 89.4) 19- 6 -10.46 5.79 -0.32 0.91 4.97
0 A McQueen ( 4-11, 86.3) 12- 0 -13.56 2.69 0.32 0.91 2.74
0 H Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 13-14 -4.26 12.00 -0.32 0.91 -4.16
0 H Damonte Ranch ( 1-13, 85.1) 18- 5 -14.76 1.49 -0.32 0.91 1.06
0 H McQueen ( 4-11, 86.3) 20- 4 -13.56 2.69 -0.32 0.91 2.15
0 A Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 11-16 -4.26 12.00 0.32 0.91 -3.57
------
34.27
|
winning pts = 45.5488 losing points = -11.2787
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------