Bishop Blanchet
W-L: ( 7- 8) PR = 88.5656Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 311 H Bellarmine Prep ( 8- 4, 91.1) 10-14 313 A Kennedy ( 6- 8, 87.9) 7-10 318 H Lakeside School (11- 4, 95.9) 4-17 325 A Squalicum ( 2- 9, 81.6) 15- 7 328 H Gonzaga Prep ( 8- 4, 85.6) 15- 9 401 A Seattle Academy ( 5- 8, 93.3) 6-14 404 H Eastside Catholic (13- 2, 99.0) 4-18 408 A Seattle Prep (13- 1, 99.9) 3-15 410 A Nathan Hale/Ingraham ( 7- 5, 83.9) 16-14 415 H Overlake ( 2- 6, 84.1) 12- 4 429 H Ballard (11- 4, 87.0) 12-11 502 A Holy Names Academy ( 4- 7, 86.4) 17- 5 510 A Kennedy ( 6- 8, 87.9) 14- 5 510 A Mount Si ( 5- 9, 91.3) 10-12 511 H Newport Sammamish Inte ( 4-11, 88.5) 10-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
311 H Bellarmine Prep 10-14 -4 -2 - -2.02
313 A Kennedy 7-10 -3 0 - -3.12
318 H Lakeside School 4-17 -13 -7 0.00
325 A Squalicum 15- 7 8 6 0.00
328 H Gonzaga Prep 15- 9 6 4 1.47
401 A Seattle Academy 6-14 -8 -5 0.00
404 H Eastside Catholic 4-18 -14 -10 0.00
408 A Seattle Prep 3-15 -12 -12 0.00
410 A Nathan Hale/Ingraham 16-14 2 4 - -2.17
415 H Overlake 12- 4 8 5 0.00
429 H Ballard 12-11 1 2 -1.11
502 A Holy Names Academy 17- 5 12 2 + 3.36
510 A Kennedy 14- 5 9 0 ++ 4.88
510 A Mount Si 10-12 -2 -3 1.27
511 H Newport Sammamish Inte 10-12 -2 1 - -2.56
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 311 H Bellarmine Prep 10-14 -4 -2 - -2.02 313 A Kennedy 7-10 -3 0 - -3.12 410 A Nathan Hale/Ingraham 16-14 2 4 - -2.17 511 H Newport Sammamish Inte 10-12 -2 1 - -2.56 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 510 A Kennedy 14- 5 9 0 ++ 4.88 502 A Holy Names Academy 17- 5 12 2 + 3.36 |
Bishop Blanchet Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anacortes | Bishop Blanchet | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Auburn-Riverside | Bishop Blanchet | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Ballard | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet | ||
| Bellarmine Prep | Bellarmine Prep | Bellarmine Prep | ||
| Bellevue | Bellevue | Bellevue 3- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Big Cat | Bishop Blanchet | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Camas | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet | ||
| Curtis | Bishop Blanchet | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 0- 3) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Eastlake | Eastlake | Eastlake 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Eastside Catholic | Eastside Catholic | Eastside Catholic | ||
| Evergreen | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet 2- 2 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Garfield | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Gonzaga Prep | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet | ||
| Graham-Kapowsin | Bishop Blanchet | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Holy Names Academy | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet | ||
| Issaquah | Issaquah | Issaquah 3- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Kamiakin | Bishop Blanchet | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Kennedy | Bishop Blanchet | tied - ( 3- 5) ( 3- 5) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Klahowya | Bishop Blanchet | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Lakeside School | Lakeside School | Lakeside School | ||
| Lincoln | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Mercer Island | Mercer Island | Mercer Island 4- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Mount Si | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet | ||
| Newport Sammamish Interl | Newport Sammamish Interl | Newport Sammamish Interl | ||
| Northshore | Northshore | Northshore 5- 2 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Overlake | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet | ||
| Peninsula SD | Bishop Blanchet | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 2) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Puyallup | Puyallup | Puyallup 3- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Richland Hanford | Bishop Blanchet | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Roosevelt | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Sandpoint | Bishop Blanchet | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Seattle Academy | Seattle Academy | Seattle Academy | ||
| Seattle Prep | Seattle Prep | Seattle Prep | ||
| Shoreline | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet 4- 0 vs 2- 1 | ||
| Snohomish | Snohomish | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Snohomish | |
| Spokane | Bishop Blanchet | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| Squalicum | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet | ||
| Stadium | Stadium | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 1) | Stadium | |
| Stanwood | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Sumner | Sumner | Sumner 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Tahoma | Bishop Blanchet | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Bishop Blanchet | |
| West Seattle | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Woodinville | Woodinville | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Woodinville |
PowerWise = 27
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 12.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Bellarmine Pre ( 8- 4, 91.1) 10-14 -8.82 14.94 -0.53 0.82 -7.68
0 A Kennedy ( 6- 8, 87.9) 7-10 -11.99 11.78 0.53 0.82 -9.40
0 H Lakeside Schoo (11- 4, 95.9) 4-17 -3.99 19.78 -0.53 0.82 -3.71
0 A Squalicum ( 2- 9, 81.6) 15- 7 -18.31 5.46 0.53 0.82 4.91
0 H Gonzaga Prep ( 8- 4, 85.6) 15- 9 -14.33 9.44 -0.53 0.82 7.30
0 A Seattle Academ ( 5- 8, 93.3) 6-14 -6.58 17.19 0.53 0.82 -4.96
0 H Eastside Catho (13- 2, 99.0) 4-18 -0.90 22.86 -0.53 0.82 -1.18
0 A Seattle Prep (13- 1, 99.9) 3-15 -0.00 23.77 0.53 0.82 -0.44
0 A Nathan Hale/In ( 7- 5, 83.9) 16-14 -16.04 7.73 0.53 0.82 6.78
0 H Overlake ( 2- 6, 84.1) 12- 4 -15.81 7.96 -0.53 0.82 6.09
0 H Ballard (11- 4, 87.0) 12-11 -12.92 10.85 -0.53 0.82 8.46
0 A Holy Names Aca ( 4- 7, 86.4) 17- 5 -13.50 10.26 0.53 0.82 8.86
0 A Kennedy ( 6- 8, 87.9) 14- 5 -11.99 11.78 0.53 0.82 10.10
0 A Mount Si ( 5- 9, 91.3) 10-12 -8.60 15.17 0.53 0.82 -6.61
0 H Newport Sammam ( 4-11, 88.5) 10-12 -11.36 12.41 -0.53 0.82 -9.76
------
8.77
|
winning pts = 52.5079 losing points = -43.7343
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------