Bainbridge Island
W-L: (12- 3) PR = 96.6613Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 311 A Roosevelt ( 3- 8, 82.3) 20- 3 313 H Garfield ( 4- 8, 81.0) 19- 5 317 A Nathan Hale/Ingraham ( 7- 5, 83.9) 20- 4 319 H Shoreline ( 8- 4, 85.0) 18- 5 324 H Bellevue ( 9- 5, 96.6) 15-11 325 A West Seattle ( 3- 9, 82.5) 18- 6 331 H Eastlake ( 7- 5, 95.0) 10- 6 403 A Lincoln ( 0-12, 76.1) 20- 3 415 A Sumner ( 6- 7, 93.4) 16- 9 422 A Ballard (11- 4, 87.0) 13- 9 424 H Issaquah (10- 5, 96.9) 8-16 429 A Mercer Island (12- 2, 99.8) 5-15 501 H Mount Si ( 5- 9, 91.3) 17- 3 505 H Eastlake ( 7- 5, 95.0) 14- 6 509 A Mercer Island (12- 2, 99.8) 6- 8
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
311 A Roosevelt 20- 3 17 14 0.00
313 H Garfield 19- 5 14 16 0.00
317 A Nathan Hale/Ingraham 20- 4 16 12 0.00
319 H Shoreline 18- 5 13 12 0.00
324 H Bellevue 15-11 4 1 + 3.40
325 A West Seattle 18- 6 12 14 0.00
331 H Eastlake 10- 6 4 2 1.85
403 A Lincoln 20- 3 17 20 0.00
415 A Sumner 16- 9 7 3 + 2.24
422 A Ballard 13- 9 4 9 -1.00
424 H Issaquah 8-16 -8 0 -- -5.31
429 A Mercer Island 5-15 -10 -4 -1.37
501 H Mount Si 17- 3 14 6 0.00
505 H Eastlake 14- 6 8 2 + 2.85
509 A Mercer Island 6- 8 -2 -4 1.63
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 424 H Issaquah 8-16 -8 0 -- -5.31 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 324 H Bellevue 15-11 4 1 + 3.40 415 A Sumner 16- 9 7 3 + 2.24 505 H Eastlake 14- 6 8 2 + 2.85 |
Bainbridge Island Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anacortes | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Auburn-Riverside | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Ballard | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Bellarmine Prep | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Bellevue | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Big Cat | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Bishop Blanchet | Bainbridge Island | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Camas | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Curtis | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Eastlake | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Eastside Catholic | Eastside Catholic | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Eastside Catholic | |
| Evergreen | Bainbridge Island | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Garfield | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Gonzaga Prep | Bainbridge Island | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 0) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Graham-Kapowsin | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Holy Names Academy | Bainbridge Island | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Issaquah | Issaquah | Issaquah | ||
| Kamiakin | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Kennedy | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Klahowya | Bainbridge Island | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Lakeside School | Bainbridge Island | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Lincoln | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Mercer Island | Mercer Island | Mercer Island | ||
| Mount Si | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Newport Sammamish Interl | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 5- 2 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Northshore | Bainbridge Island | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 0) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Overlake | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 5- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Peninsula SD | Bainbridge Island | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Puyallup | Bainbridge Island | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Richland Hanford | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Roosevelt | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Sandpoint | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Seattle Academy | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 3- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Seattle Prep | Seattle Prep | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 0) | Seattle Prep | |
| Shoreline | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Snohomish | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Spokane | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Squalicum | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Stadium | Bainbridge Island | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Stanwood | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Sumner | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Tahoma | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| West Seattle | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Woodinville | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island 2- 2 vs 0- 4 |
PowerWise = 41
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 12.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Roosevelt ( 3- 8, 82.3) 20- 3 -17.65 6.12 0.53 0.82 5.46
0 H Garfield ( 4- 8, 81.0) 19- 5 -18.92 4.84 -0.53 0.82 3.54
0 A Nathan Hale/In ( 7- 5, 83.9) 20- 4 -16.04 7.73 0.53 0.82 6.78
0 H Shoreline ( 8- 4, 85.0) 18- 5 -14.90 8.87 -0.53 0.82 6.84
0 H Bellevue ( 9- 5, 96.6) 15-11 -3.30 20.46 -0.53 0.82 16.35
0 A West Seattle ( 3- 9, 82.5) 18- 6 -17.41 6.35 0.53 0.82 5.65
0 H Eastlake ( 7- 5, 95.0) 10- 6 -4.86 18.91 -0.53 0.82 15.07
0 A Lincoln ( 0-12, 76.1) 20- 3 -23.77 1.00 0.53 0.82 1.26
0 A Sumner ( 6- 7, 93.4) 16- 9 -6.53 17.23 0.53 0.82 14.57
0 A Ballard (11- 4, 87.0) 13- 9 -12.92 10.85 0.53 0.82 9.34
0 H Issaquah (10- 5, 96.9) 8-16 -3.01 20.76 -0.53 0.82 -2.91
0 A Mercer Island (12- 2, 99.8) 5-15 -0.15 23.62 0.53 0.82 -0.32
0 H Mount Si ( 5- 9, 91.3) 17- 3 -8.60 15.17 -0.53 0.82 12.01
0 H Eastlake ( 7- 5, 95.0) 14- 6 -4.86 18.91 -0.53 0.82 15.07
0 A Mercer Island (12- 2, 99.8) 6- 8 -0.15 23.62 0.53 0.82 -0.32
------
108.39
|
winning pts = 111.9321 losing points = -3.5432
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------