Trinity Collegiate
W-L: ( 2- 8) PR = 69.3009Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 224 A Porter-Gaud School (14- 0, 91.6) 2-17 226 H Spring Valley ( 7- 8, 71.7) 4-15 306 H Pinewood Prep ( 6- 8, 74.9) 3-13 317 A Heathwood Hall (10- 4, 83.4) 0-14 319 A Spring Valley ( 7- 8, 71.7) 8- 9 321 H Irmo ( 0-16, 66.8) 8- 7 324 H Heathwood Hall (10- 4, 83.4) 0-14 326 H Ashley Hall ( 2- 9, 77.5) 2-14 408 H Porter-Gaud School (14- 0, 91.6) 2-15 410 A Irmo ( 0-16, 66.8) 14- 3
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
224 A Porter-Gaud School 2-17 -15 -23 0.00
226 H Spring Valley 4-15 -11 -2 - -3.22
306 H Pinewood Prep 3-13 -10 -5 -0.03
317 A Heathwood Hall 0-14 -14 -15 0.00
319 A Spring Valley 8- 9 -1 -3 + 2.02
321 H Irmo 8- 7 1 3 - -2.10
324 H Heathwood Hall 0-14 -14 -13 0.00
326 H Ashley Hall 2-14 -12 -8 0.00
408 H Porter-Gaud School 2-15 -13 -22 0.00
410 A Irmo 14- 3 11 2 + 3.14
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 226 H Spring Valley 4-15 -11 -2 - -3.22 321 H Irmo 8- 7 1 3 - -2.10 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 319 A Spring Valley 8- 9 -1 -3 + 2.02 410 A Irmo 14- 3 11 2 + 3.14 |
Trinity Collegiate Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | AC Flora | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | AC Flora | |
| Academic Magnet | Academic Magnet | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Academic Magnet | |
| Aiken | Aiken | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Aiken | |
| Ashley Hall | Ashley Hall | Ashley Hall | ||
| Beaufort | Beaufort | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Beaufort | |
| Bishop England | Bishop England | Bishop England | ||
| Bluffton | Bluffton | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bluffton | |
| Blythewood | Blythewood | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Blythewood | |
| Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Byrnes | Byrnes | Byrnes | ||
| Carolina Forest | Carolina Forest | Carolina Forest | ||
| Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Chapin | Chapin | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Chapin | |
| Christ Church Episcopal | Christ Church Episcopal | Christ Church Episcopal | ||
| Clover | Clover | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Clover | |
| Dorman | Dorman | Dorman | ||
| Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Dutch Fork | |
| Eastside | Eastside | Eastside | ||
| Fort Mill | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Fountain Inn | Fountain Inn | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Fountain Inn | |
| Greenville | Greenville | Greenville | ||
| Heathwood Hall | Heathwood Hall | Heathwood Hall | ||
| Hillcrest | Hillcrest | Hillcrest | ||
| Hilton Head | Hilton Head | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Hilton Head | |
| Irmo | Trinity Collegiate | Trinity Collegiate | ||
| James Island | James Island | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | James Island | |
| JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Legion Collegiate Academ | Legion Collegiate Academ | Legion Collegiate Academ | ||
| Lexington | Lexington | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Lexington | |
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | ||
| Mauldin | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| May River | May River | May River 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Mid-Carolina | Mid-Carolina | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Mid-Carolina | |
| Myrtle Beach | Myrtle Beach | Myrtle Beach | ||
| Nation Ford | Nation Ford | Nation Ford | ||
| North Myrtle Beach | North Myrtle Beach | North Myrtle Beach | ||
| Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | ||
| Philip Simmons | Philip Simmons | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Philip Simmons | |
| Pinewood Prep | Pinewood Prep | Pinewood Prep | ||
| Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | ||
| Ridge View | Ridge View | Ridge View | ||
| River Bluff | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | River Bluff | |
| Riverside | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Socastee | Socastee | Socastee | ||
| Spartanburg | Spartanburg | Spartanburg | ||
| Spring Valley | Spring Valley | Spring Valley | ||
| St James | St James | St James | ||
| St Josephs Catholic | St Josephs Catholic | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Josephs Catholic | |
| TL Hanna | TL Hanna | TL Hanna | ||
| Waccamaw | Waccamaw | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Waccamaw | |
| Wade Hampton | Wade Hampton | Wade Hampton | ||
| Wando | Wando | Wando | ||
| West Ashley | West Ashley | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | West Ashley | |
| Westside | Trinity Collegiate | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Trinity Collegiate | |
| White Knoll | White Knoll | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | White Knoll | |
| Woodmont | Woodmont | Woodmont |
PowerWise = 2
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.58
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Porter-Gaud Sc (14- 0, 91.6) 2-17 -8.27 25.40 0.62 1.36 -10.38
0 H Spring Valley ( 7- 8, 71.7) 4-15 -28.20 5.47 -0.62 1.36 -39.14
0 H Pinewood Prep ( 6- 8, 74.9) 3-13 -25.01 8.66 -0.62 1.36 -34.80
0 A Heathwood Hall (10- 4, 83.4) 0-14 -16.52 17.15 0.62 1.36 -21.59
0 A Spring Valley ( 7- 8, 71.7) 8- 9 -28.20 5.47 0.62 1.36 -37.46
0 H Irmo ( 0-16, 66.8) 8- 7 -33.08 1.00 -0.62 1.36 0.52
0 H Heathwood Hall (10- 4, 83.4) 0-14 -16.52 17.15 -0.62 1.36 -23.27
0 H Ashley Hall ( 2- 9, 77.5) 2-14 -22.39 11.28 -0.62 1.36 -31.24
0 H Porter-Gaud Sc (14- 0, 91.6) 2-15 -8.27 25.40 -0.62 1.36 -12.07
0 A Irmo ( 0-16, 66.8) 14- 3 -33.08 1.00 0.62 1.36 2.20
------
-207.23
|
winning pts = 2.7158 losing points = -209.9483
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------