---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:02 PDT

safe3step girls Stanwood 1
  
Stanwood              
W-L: ( 0- 9) PR = 76.1322

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 311 H Nathan Hale/Ingraham ( 7- 5, 83.9) 10-18 313 A Snohomish ( 7- 6, 91.0) 3-17 325 H Northshore (11- 2, 95.8) 0-20 401 H Shoreline ( 8- 4, 85.0) 4-16 414 A Anacortes ( 3- 9, 82.8) 2-18 417 H Squalicum ( 2- 9, 81.6) 6-15 422 A Garfield ( 4- 8, 81.0) 2-13 428 A Woodinville ( 4- 9, 93.9) 3-17 501 H Tahoma ( 7- 6, 85.3) 6-18

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   311 H Nathan Hale/Ingraham   10-18      -8    -7           0.00
   313 A Snohomish               3-17     -14   -15           0.00
   325 H Northshore              0-20     -20   -19           0.00
   401 H Shoreline               4-16     -12    -8           0.00
   414 A Anacortes               2-18     -16    -7           0.00
   417 H Squalicum               6-15      -9    -5          -0.08
   422 A Garfield                2-13     -11    -5           0.00
   428 A Woodinville             3-17     -14   -18           0.00
   501 H Tahoma                  6-18     -12    -9           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Stanwood Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Anacortes Anacortes Anacortes  
Auburn-Riverside Auburn-Riverside insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) Auburn-Riverside
Bainbridge Island Bainbridge Island Bainbridge Island   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Ballard Ballard Ballard   5- 0 vs 0- 5
Bellarmine Prep Bellarmine Prep tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Bellarmine Prep
Bellevue Bellevue insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Bellevue
Big Cat Big Cat   Big Cat
Bishop Blanchet Bishop Blanchet Bishop Blanchet   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Camas Camas   Camas
Curtis Curtis insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Curtis
Eastlake Eastlake Eastlake   3- 0 vs 0- 4
Eastside Catholic Eastside Catholic Eastside Catholic   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Evergreen Evergreen tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Evergreen
Garfield Garfield Garfield  
Gonzaga Prep Gonzaga Prep tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 0) Gonzaga Prep
Graham-Kapowsin Graham-Kapowsin tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Graham-Kapowsin
Holy Names Academy Holy Names Academy Holy Names Academy   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Issaquah Issaquah insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Issaquah
Kamiakin Kamiakin   Kamiakin
Kennedy Kennedy insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Kennedy
Klahowya Klahowya tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Klahowya
Lakeside School Lakeside School insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Lakeside School
Lincoln Stanwood tied - ( 0- 6) ( 0- 6) Stanwood
Mercer Island Mercer Island Mercer Island   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Mount Si Mount Si Mount Si   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Nathan Hale/Ingraham Nathan Hale/Ingraham Nathan Hale/Ingraham  
Newport Sammamish Interl Newport Sammamish Interl insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) Newport Sammamish Interl
Northshore Northshore Northshore  
Overlake Overlake insuffient: ( 0- 5)( 1- 2) Overlake
Peninsula SD Peninsula SD insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Peninsula SD
Puyallup Puyallup Puyallup   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Richland Hanford Richland Hanford   Richland Hanford
Roosevelt Roosevelt insuffient: ( 0- 4)( 1- 3) Roosevelt
Sandpoint Sandpoint   Sandpoint
Seattle Academy Seattle Academy insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Seattle Academy
Seattle Prep Seattle Prep insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Seattle Prep
Shoreline Shoreline Shoreline  
Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish  
Spokane Spokane   Spokane
Squalicum Squalicum Squalicum  
Stadium Stadium insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Stadium
Sumner Sumner Sumner   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Tahoma Tahoma Tahoma  
West Seattle West Seattle insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) West Seattle
Woodinville Woodinville Woodinville  

PowerWise = 1


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 12.30

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Nathan Hale/In  ( 7- 5, 83.9)    10-18      -16.04       7.73      -0.53         1.37           -22.66
   0 A Snohomish       ( 7- 6, 91.0)     3-17       -8.89      14.88       0.53         1.37           -11.42
   0 H Northshore      (11- 2, 95.8)     0-20       -4.08      19.69      -0.53         1.37            -6.31
   0 H Shoreline       ( 8- 4, 85.0)     4-16      -14.90       8.87      -0.53         1.37           -21.10
   0 A Anacortes       ( 3- 9, 82.8)     2-18      -17.10       6.67       0.53         1.37           -22.65
   0 H Squalicum       ( 2- 9, 81.6)     6-15      -18.31       5.46      -0.53         1.37           -25.76
   0 A Garfield        ( 4- 8, 81.0)     2-13      -18.92       4.84       0.53         1.37           -25.14
   0 A Woodinville     ( 4- 9, 93.9)     3-17       -5.97      17.79       0.53         1.37            -7.44
   0 H Tahoma          ( 7- 6, 85.3)     6-18      -14.59       9.18      -0.53         1.37           -20.68
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                      -163.16

winning pts = 0.0000 losing points = -163.1557

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------