Notre Dame
W-L: (14- 4) PR = 91.6181
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
327 H Oregon (11- 4, 90.2) 12-11
401 A Appleton ( 7- 9, 88.1) 9- 4
405 H Hudson (11- 0, 99.9) 5-14
408 H De Pere ( 8-10, 86.3) 14- 8
411 H Middleton ( 5- 8, 86.1) 13- 6
412 A Brookfield (15- 3, 93.5) 14-20
415 A Bay Port (11- 6, 88.7) 15- 6
421 H Neenah (10- 6, 86.3) 11-10
430 H Bay Port (11- 6, 88.7) 10- 7
508 A Central Wisconsin (11- 5, 88.0) 13-11
510 A Verona ( 5-10, 87.2) 15- 5
512 A Waunakee ( 8- 9, 88.4) 17-11
517 H Kettle Moraine (19- 4, 95.8) 12-13
522 A Kimberly ( 3- 9, 81.8) 21- 8
523 A Pulaski ( 0-11, 79.0) 13- 4
529 N Janesville ( 4-11, 84.0) 14- 1
603 N Bay Port (11- 6, 88.7) 7- 4
605 A Madison (15- 4, 93.0) 9-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
327 H Oregon 12-11 1 2 -0.99
401 A Appleton 9- 4 5 3 + 2.10
405 H Hudson 5-14 -9 -8 0.00
408 H De Pere 14- 8 6 6 0.00
411 H Middleton 13- 6 7 6 0.00
412 A Brookfield 14-20 -6 -3 - -2.47
415 A Bay Port 15- 6 9 2 + 2.65
421 H Neenah 11-10 1 6 -- -4.00
430 H Bay Port 10- 7 3 4 -0.55
508 A Central Wisconsin 13-11 2 3 -0.96
510 A Verona 15- 5 10 4 1.18
512 A Waunakee 17-11 6 3 + 2.39
517 H Kettle Moraine 12-13 -1 -4 + 2.61
522 A Kimberly 21- 8 13 9 0.00
523 A Pulaski 13- 4 9 12 0.00
529 N Janesville 14- 1 13 8 0.00
603 N Bay Port 7- 4 3 3 0.05
605 A Madison 9-12 -3 -2 -1.06
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
421 H Neenah 11-10 1 6 -- -4.00
412 A Brookfield 14-20 -6 -3 - -2.47
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
401 A Appleton 9- 4 5 3 + 2.10
415 A Bay Port 15- 6 9 2 + 2.65
512 A Waunakee 17-11 6 3 + 2.39
517 H Kettle Moraine 12-13 -1 -4 + 2.61
|
Notre Dame Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
Appleton |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
Arrowhead |
Arrowhead |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) |
Arrowhead |
Bay Port |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
Brookfield |
Brookfield |
Brookfield |
 
| |
Cedarburg |
Notre Dame |
|
 
| Notre Dame |
Central Wisconsin |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
De Pere |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
DeForest |
Notre Dame |
|
Notre Dame   6- 1 vs 3- 4 |
|
Divine Savior |
Notre Dame |
|
tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) |
Notre Dame |
Franklin |
Notre Dame |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Notre Dame |
Hamilton |
Notre Dame |
|
Notre Dame   6- 1 vs 1- 6 |
|
Homestead |
Notre Dame |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) |
Notre Dame |
Hudson |
Hudson |
Hudson |
 
| |
Janesville |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
Kenosha |
Notre Dame |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Notre Dame |
Kettle Moraine |
Kettle Moraine |
Kettle Moraine |
 
| |
Kimberly |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
Madison |
Madison |
Madison |
 
| |
Middleton |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
Mukwonago |
Mukwonago |
|
Mukwonago   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
Muskego |
Muskego |
|
tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) |
Muskego |
Neenah |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
Oak Creek |
Notre Dame |
|
 
| Notre Dame |
Oconomowoc |
Notre Dame |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Notre Dame |
Oregon |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
Pulaski |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
Sun Prairie |
Notre Dame |
|
Notre Dame   8- 2 vs 0-10 |
|
Superior |
Notre Dame |
|
Notre Dame   5- 1 vs 0- 6 |
|
University Milwaukee |
University Milwaukee |
|
University Milwaukee   3- 1 vs 1- 3 |
|
Verona |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
Waukesha |
Notre Dame |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Notre Dame |
Waunakee |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
 
| |
Wauwatosa |
Notre Dame |
|
Notre Dame   2- 2 vs 0- 4 |
|
West Bend |
Notre Dame |
|
Notre Dame   3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
|
Whitefish Bay |
Whitefish Bay |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) |
Whitefish Bay |
PowerWise = 26

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 15.72
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Oregon (11- 4, 90.2) 12-11 -9.67 11.23 -0.60 0.87 9.28
0 A Appleton ( 7- 9, 88.1) 9- 4 -11.79 9.11 0.60 0.87 8.49
0 H Hudson (11- 0, 99.9) 5-14 -0.00 20.90 -0.60 0.87 -0.53
0 H De Pere ( 8-10, 86.3) 14- 8 -13.64 7.26 -0.60 0.87 5.81
0 H Middleton ( 5- 8, 86.1) 13- 6 -13.76 7.14 -0.60 0.87 5.71
0 A Brookfield (15- 3, 93.5) 14-20 -6.36 14.54 0.60 0.87 -5.03
0 A Bay Port (11- 6, 88.7) 15- 6 -11.23 9.67 0.60 0.87 8.97
0 H Neenah (10- 6, 86.3) 11-10 -13.62 7.28 -0.60 0.87 5.83
0 H Bay Port (11- 6, 88.7) 10- 7 -11.23 9.67 -0.60 0.87 7.92
0 A Central Wiscon (11- 5, 88.0) 13-11 -11.85 9.05 0.60 0.87 8.43
0 A Verona ( 5-10, 87.2) 15- 5 -12.71 8.20 0.60 0.87 7.69
0 A Waunakee ( 8- 9, 88.4) 17-11 -11.49 9.41 0.60 0.87 8.74
0 H Kettle Moraine (19- 4, 95.8) 12-13 -4.07 16.84 -0.60 0.87 -4.08
0 A Kimberly ( 3- 9, 81.8) 21- 8 -18.15 2.75 0.60 0.87 2.93
0 A Pulaski ( 0-11, 79.0) 13- 4 -20.90 1.00 0.60 0.87 1.40
0 N Janesville ( 4-11, 84.0) 14- 1 -15.88 5.02 -0.00 0.87 4.39
0 N Bay Port (11- 6, 88.7) 7- 4 -11.23 9.67 -0.00 0.87 8.45
0 A Madison (15- 4, 93.0) 9-12 -6.94 13.96 0.60 0.87 -5.54
------
78.88
|
winning pts = 94.0516 losing points = -15.1718
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------