Kimberly
W-L: ( 3- 9) PR = 81.7527Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 417 A Bay Port (11- 6, 88.7) 6-17 418 H Neenah (10- 6, 86.3) 7-11 429 A Central Wisconsin (11- 5, 88.0) 4-17 501 H Pulaski ( 0-11, 79.0) 15- 7 503 H Middleton ( 5- 8, 86.1) 8-16 506 A Hamilton ( 4-13, 82.6) 9-17 507 A Neenah (10- 6, 86.3) 9-15 509 H Superior ( 0- 9, 80.0) 9- 7 520 H De Pere ( 8-10, 86.3) 11-13 522 H Notre Dame (14- 4, 91.6) 8-21 527 H Pulaski ( 0-11, 79.0) 15- 9 529 A Madison (15- 4, 93.0) 7-20
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
417 A Bay Port 6-17 -11 -8 0.00
418 H Neenah 7-11 -4 -4 -0.08
429 A Central Wisconsin 4-17 -13 -7 0.00
501 H Pulaski 15- 7 8 3 1.64
503 H Middleton 8-16 -8 -4 -1.21
506 A Hamilton 9-17 -8 -1 - -3.55
507 A Neenah 9-15 -6 -5 0.00
509 H Superior 9- 7 2 2 -0.33
520 H De Pere 11-13 -2 -4 1.90
522 H Notre Dame 8-21 -13 -9 0.00
527 H Pulaski 15- 9 6 3 1.64
529 A Madison 7-20 -13 -12 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 506 A Hamilton 9-17 -8 -1 - -3.55 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Kimberly Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appleton | Appleton | Appleton 5- 3 vs 2- 6 | ||
| Arrowhead | Arrowhead | Arrowhead | ||
| Bay Port | Bay Port | Bay Port | ||
| Brookfield | Brookfield | Brookfield 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Cedarburg | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Central Wisconsin | Central Wisconsin | Central Wisconsin | ||
| De Pere | De Pere | De Pere | ||
| DeForest | DeForest | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | DeForest | |
| Divine Savior | Divine Savior | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Divine Savior | |
| Franklin | Franklin | Franklin | ||
| Hamilton | Hamilton | Hamilton | ||
| Homestead | Homestead | Homestead | ||
| Hudson | Hudson | Hudson 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Janesville | Janesville | insuffient: ( 1- 5)( 2- 4) | Janesville | |
| Kenosha | Kenosha | Kenosha | ||
| Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Madison | Madison | Madison | ||
| Middleton | Middleton | Middleton | ||
| Mukwonago | Mukwonago | Mukwonago 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Muskego | Muskego | Muskego | ||
| Neenah | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | Notre Dame | ||
| Oak Creek | Oak Creek | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Oak Creek | |
| Oconomowoc | Oconomowoc | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Oconomowoc | |
| Oregon | Oregon | Oregon 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Pulaski | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Sun Prairie | Kimberly | tied - ( 1- 5) ( 1- 5) | Kimberly | |
| Superior | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| University Milwaukee | University Milwaukee | University Milwaukee | ||
| Verona | Verona | Verona 2- 3 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Waukesha | Waukesha | Waukesha | ||
| Waunakee | Waunakee | Waunakee 2- 4 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Wauwatosa | Wauwatosa | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Wauwatosa | |
| West Bend | West Bend | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | West Bend | |
| Whitefish Bay | Whitefish Bay | Whitefish Bay 2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
PowerWise = 3
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.72
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Bay Port (11- 6, 88.7) 6-17 -11.23 9.67 0.60 1.31 -13.92
0 H Neenah (10- 6, 86.3) 7-11 -13.62 7.28 -0.60 1.31 -18.64
0 A Central Wiscon (11- 5, 88.0) 4-17 -11.85 9.05 0.60 1.31 -14.74
0 H Pulaski ( 0-11, 79.0) 15- 7 -20.90 1.00 -0.60 1.31 0.52
0 H Middleton ( 5- 8, 86.1) 8-16 -13.76 7.14 -0.60 1.31 -18.82
0 A Hamilton ( 4-13, 82.6) 9-17 -17.30 3.60 0.60 1.31 -21.88
0 A Neenah (10- 6, 86.3) 9-15 -13.62 7.28 0.60 1.31 -17.06
0 H Superior ( 0- 9, 80.0) 9- 7 -19.88 1.02 -0.60 1.31 0.55
0 H De Pere ( 8-10, 86.3) 11-13 -13.64 7.26 -0.60 1.31 -18.67
0 H Notre Dame (14- 4, 91.6) 8-21 -8.28 12.62 -0.60 1.31 -11.64
0 H Pulaski ( 0-11, 79.0) 15- 9 -20.90 1.00 -0.60 1.31 0.52
0 A Madison (15- 4, 93.0) 7-20 -6.94 13.96 0.60 1.31 -8.31
------
-142.09
|
winning pts = 1.5872 losing points = -143.6736
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------