Northshore
W-L: (11- 2) PR = 95.8196Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 310 H Lakeside School (11- 4, 95.9) 11-10 318 A Mount Si ( 5- 9, 91.3) 13- 6 321 H Seattle Academy ( 5- 8, 93.3) 8- 9 325 A Stanwood ( 0- 9, 76.1) 20- 0 329 A Newport Sammamish Inte ( 4-11, 88.5) 25-12 401 H Snohomish ( 7- 6, 91.0) 15- 6 416 H Anacortes ( 3- 9, 82.8) 20- 7 418 H Woodinville ( 4- 9, 93.9) 20-12 423 A Squalicum ( 2- 9, 81.6) 19- 2 425 A Roosevelt ( 3- 8, 82.3) 19- 4 430 H Bellarmine Prep ( 8- 4, 91.1) 16- 7 502 A Eastlake ( 7- 5, 95.0) 11-11 505 H Woodinville ( 4- 9, 93.9) 13-10 508 A Eastside Catholic (13- 2, 99.0) 7-11
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
310 H Lakeside School 11-10 1 0 0.56
318 A Mount Si 13- 6 7 4 1.02
321 H Seattle Academy 8- 9 -1 3 -- -4.04
325 A Stanwood 20- 0 20 19 0.00
329 A Newport Sammamish Inte 25-12 13 7 0.00
401 H Snohomish 15- 6 9 5 0.00
416 H Anacortes 20- 7 13 14 0.00
418 H Woodinville 20-12 8 2 + 2.57
423 A Squalicum 19- 2 17 14 0.00
425 A Roosevelt 19- 4 15 13 0.00
430 H Bellarmine Prep 16- 7 9 5 0.00
502 A Eastlake 11-11 0 0 -0.25
505 H Woodinville 13-10 3 2 0.57
508 A Eastside Catholic 7-11 -4 -4 -0.29
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 321 H Seattle Academy 8- 9 -1 3 -- -4.04 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 418 H Woodinville 20-12 8 2 + 2.57 |
Northshore Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anacortes | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Auburn-Riverside | Northshore | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Northshore | |
| Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 4- 0) | Bainbridge Island | |
| Ballard | Northshore | insuffient: ( 5- 0)( 4- 1) | Northshore | |
| Bellarmine Prep | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Bellevue | Bellevue | Bellevue 6- 1 vs 4- 2 | ||
| Big Cat | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Bishop Blanchet | Northshore | Northshore 5- 2 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Camas | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Curtis | Northshore | Northshore 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Eastlake | Northshore | tied - ( 5- 0) ( 5- 0) | Northshore | |
| Eastside Catholic | Eastside Catholic | Eastside Catholic | ||
| Evergreen | Northshore | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Northshore | |
| Garfield | Northshore | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Northshore | |
| Gonzaga Prep | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Graham-Kapowsin | Northshore | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Northshore | |
| Holy Names Academy | Northshore | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | Northshore | |
| Issaquah | Issaquah | Issaquah 5- 1 vs 3- 2 | ||
| Kamiakin | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Kennedy | Northshore | Northshore 3- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Klahowya | Northshore | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Northshore | |
| Lakeside School | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Lincoln | Northshore | Northshore 4- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Mercer Island | Mercer Island | Mercer Island 8- 0 vs 5- 2 | ||
| Mount Si | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Northshore | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Northshore | |
| Newport Sammamish Interl | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Overlake | Northshore | Northshore 3- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Peninsula SD | Northshore | Northshore 3- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Puyallup | Northshore | insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) | Northshore | |
| Richland Hanford | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Roosevelt | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Sandpoint | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Seattle Academy | Seattle Academy | Seattle Academy | ||
| Seattle Prep | Seattle Prep | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 1) | Seattle Prep | |
| Shoreline | Northshore | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Northshore | |
| Snohomish | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Spokane | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Squalicum | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Stadium | Northshore | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Northshore | |
| Stanwood | Northshore | Northshore | ||
| Sumner | Northshore | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) | Northshore | |
| Tahoma | Northshore | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Northshore | |
| West Seattle | Northshore | Northshore 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Woodinville | Northshore | Northshore |
PowerWise = 38
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 12.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Lakeside Schoo (11- 4, 95.9) 11-10 -3.99 19.78 -0.53 0.88 16.91
0 A Mount Si ( 5- 9, 91.3) 13- 6 -8.60 15.17 0.53 0.88 13.80
0 H Seattle Academ ( 5- 8, 93.3) 8- 9 -6.58 17.19 -0.53 0.88 -6.25
0 A Stanwood ( 0- 9, 76.1) 20- 0 -23.77 1.00 0.53 0.88 1.35
0 A Newport Sammam ( 4-11, 88.5) 25-12 -11.36 12.41 0.53 0.88 11.38
0 H Snohomish ( 7- 6, 91.0) 15- 6 -8.89 14.88 -0.53 0.88 12.61
0 H Anacortes ( 3- 9, 82.8) 20- 7 -17.10 6.67 -0.53 0.88 5.39
0 H Woodinville ( 4- 9, 93.9) 20-12 -5.97 17.79 -0.53 0.88 15.17
0 A Squalicum ( 2- 9, 81.6) 19- 2 -18.31 5.46 0.53 0.88 5.26
0 A Roosevelt ( 3- 8, 82.3) 19- 4 -17.65 6.12 0.53 0.88 5.85
0 H Bellarmine Pre ( 8- 4, 91.1) 16- 7 -8.82 14.94 -0.53 0.88 12.67
0 H Woodinville ( 4- 9, 93.9) 13-10 -5.97 17.79 -0.53 0.88 15.17
0 A Eastside Catho (13- 2, 99.0) 7-11 -0.90 22.86 0.53 0.88 -0.33
------
108.97
|
winning pts = 115.5543 losing points = -6.5804
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------