Prospect
W-L: ( 9- 8) PR = 82.2236Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 317 H York (13- 7, 92.1) 4-17 320 A Glenbrook South (11-10, 85.5) 3- 8 407 A Barrington (21- 2, 92.6) 5-18 410 H Schaumburg ( 9-11, 82.2) 6- 5 411 A Mundelein ( 5-13, 76.8) 12- 6 414 A Palatine (11- 8, 84.4) 9-11 419 H Lake Zurich (10- 7, 84.4) 1-12 421 A Elk Grove ( 0-17, 67.2) 17- 2 424 A Hersey (14- 9, 88.7) 4-15 428 H Hoffman Estates ( 5-13, 78.1) 8- 5 501 A Fremd (14- 5, 86.3) 7-14 503 A Libertyville ( 8-12, 79.3) 15- 4 505 A Rolling Meadows ( 3-14, 74.9) 12- 2 508 H Buffalo Grove ( 3-13, 73.2) 16- 2 512 H Conant (10-10, 83.6) 10- 8 517 A Streamwood ( 4-13, 73.4) 13- 4 526 A Lake Forest HS (15- 5, 93.9) 11-17
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
317 H York 4-17 -13 -9 0.00
320 A Glenbrook South 3- 8 -5 -4 -1.27
407 A Barrington 5-18 -13 -11 0.00
410 H Schaumburg 6- 5 1 1 0.44
411 A Mundelein 12- 6 6 5 0.04
414 A Palatine 9-11 -2 -3 0.68
419 H Lake Zurich 1-12 -11 -2 - -3.35
421 A Elk Grove 17- 2 15 15 0.00
424 A Hersey 4-15 -11 -7 0.00
428 H Hoffman Estates 8- 5 3 5 -1.59
501 A Fremd 7-14 -7 -5 -0.40
503 A Libertyville 15- 4 11 2 + 2.60
505 A Rolling Meadows 12- 2 10 7 0.00
508 H Buffalo Grove 16- 2 14 9 0.00
512 H Conant 10- 8 2 -1 + 2.87
517 A Streamwood 13- 4 9 8 0.00
526 A Lake Forest HS 11-17 -6 -12 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 419 H Lake Zurich 1-12 -11 -2 - -3.35 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 503 A Libertyville 15- 4 11 2 + 2.60 512 H Conant 10- 8 2 -1 + 2.87 |
Prospect Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barrington | Barrington | Barrington | ||
| Benet Academy | Benet Academy | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Benet Academy | |
| Bloomington | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Buffalo Grove | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Burlington Central | Prospect | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Prospect | |
| Carmel Catholic | Carmel Catholic | Carmel Catholic 4- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Conant | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Crystal Lake | Crystal Lake | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Crystal Lake | |
| Deerfield | Prospect | tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) | Prospect | |
| DePaul Prep | DePaul Prep | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | DePaul Prep | |
| Downers Grove Co-Op | Downers Grove Co-Op | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Downers Grove Co-Op | |
| Dunlap | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Edwardsville | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Elk Grove | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Evanston | Evanston | Evanston 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Fenwick | Fenwick | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Fenwick | |
| Fremd | Fremd | Fremd | ||
| Geneva | Prospect | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Prospect | |
| Glenbard West | Glenbard West | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Glenbard West | |
| Glenbrook North | Glenbrook North | tied - ( 2- 4) ( 2- 4) | Glenbrook North | |
| Glenbrook South | Glenbrook South | Glenbrook South | ||
| Gurnee Warren | Prospect | insuffient: ( 3- 7)( 2- 8) | Prospect | |
| Hampshire | Prospect | tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) | Prospect | |
| Hersey | Hersey | Hersey | ||
| Highland Park | Prospect | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) | Prospect | |
| Hinsdale Central | Hinsdale Central | Hinsdale Central 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Hoffman Estates | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Huntley | Huntley | insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 4- 1) | Huntley | |
| Jones | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Kenwood | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Lake Forest Academy | Prospect | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Prospect | |
| Lake Forest HS | Lake Forest HS | Lake Forest HS | ||
| Lake Zurich | Lake Zurich | Lake Zurich | ||
| Lane Tech | Prospect | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Prospect | |
| Latin School | Prospect | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Prospect | |
| Libertyville | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Lincoln Park | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Lincoln-Way Co-Op | Lincoln-Way Co-Op | Lincoln-Way Co-Op | ||
| Lockport | Lockport | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Lockport | |
| Loyola Academy | Loyola Academy | Loyola Academy 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Lyons Township | Lyons Township | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | Lyons Township | |
| Maine South | Maine South | Maine South 6- 0 vs 3- 3 | ||
| Marist | Marist | Marist 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Mather | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| McHenry | Prospect | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Prospect | |
| Metea Valley | Metea Valley | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Metea Valley | |
| Minooka | Prospect | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Prospect | |
| Montini Catholic | Montini Catholic | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Montini Catholic | |
| Mother McAuley | Mother McAuley | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Mother McAuley | |
| Mundelein | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Naperville Central | Naperville Central | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Naperville Central | |
| Naperville North | Naperville North | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Naperville North | |
| Nazareth Academy | Nazareth Academy | Nazareth Academy | ||
| Neuqua Valley | Prospect | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Prospect | |
| New Trier | New Trier | New Trier 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Normal Community | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Northside Prep | Prospect | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Prospect | |
| Oak Park-River Forest | Oak Park-River Forest | Oak Park-River Forest 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| OFallon | OFallon | OFallon | ||
| Palatine | Palatine | Palatine | ||
| Payton College Prep | Prospect | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Prospect | |
| Plainfield East | Prospect | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Prospect | |
| Providence Catholic | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Regina Dominican | Prospect | Prospect 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Resurrection | Prospect | Prospect 3- 1 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Riverside-Brookfield | Prospect | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Prospect | |
| Rolling Meadows | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Rosary | Prospect | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Prospect | |
| Sandburg | Sandburg | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Sandburg | |
| Schaumburg | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| St Charles | St Charles | St Charles | ||
| St Francis | Prospect | Prospect 4- 2 vs 2- 4 | ||
| St Ignatius | St Ignatius | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | St Ignatius | |
| St Laurence | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| St Viator | St Viator | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 2) | St Viator | |
| Stevenson | Stevenson | tied - ( 3- 4) ( 3- 4) | Stevenson | |
| Streamwood | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Taft HS | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Trinity | Prospect | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Prospect | |
| Vernon Hills | Prospect | Prospect 5- 1 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Washington | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| Wheaton United | Wheaton United | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Wheaton United | |
| Whitney Young | Prospect | Prospect | ||
| York | York | York |
PowerWise = 44
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 16.92
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H York (13- 7, 92.1) 4-17 -7.78 30.83 -0.50 1.00 -8.25
0 A Glenbrook Sout (11-10, 85.5) 3- 8 -14.44 24.17 0.50 1.00 -13.87
0 A Barrington (21- 2, 92.6) 5-18 -7.29 31.32 0.50 1.00 -6.76
0 H Schaumburg ( 9-11, 82.2) 6- 5 -17.74 20.87 -0.50 1.00 20.27
0 A Mundelein ( 5-13, 76.8) 12- 6 -23.14 15.47 0.50 1.00 15.89
0 A Palatine (11- 8, 84.4) 9-11 -15.50 23.11 0.50 1.00 -14.92
0 H Lake Zurich (10- 7, 84.4) 1-12 -15.53 23.08 -0.50 1.00 -15.95
0 A Elk Grove ( 0-17, 67.2) 17- 2 -32.69 5.92 0.50 1.00 6.39
0 A Hersey (14- 9, 88.7) 4-15 -11.17 27.44 0.50 1.00 -10.62
0 H Hoffman Estate ( 5-13, 78.1) 8- 5 -21.76 16.85 -0.50 1.00 16.27
0 A Fremd (14- 5, 86.3) 7-14 -13.58 25.03 0.50 1.00 -13.02
0 A Libertyville ( 8-12, 79.3) 15- 4 -20.57 18.04 0.50 1.00 18.45
0 A Rolling Meadow ( 3-14, 74.9) 12- 2 -24.95 13.65 0.50 1.00 14.09
0 H Buffalo Grove ( 3-13, 73.2) 16- 2 -26.67 11.93 -0.50 1.00 11.38
0 H Conant (10-10, 83.6) 10- 8 -16.31 22.30 -0.50 1.00 21.69
0 A Streamwood ( 4-13, 73.4) 13- 4 -26.46 12.15 0.50 1.00 12.59
0 A Lake Forest HS (15- 5, 93.9) 11-17 -5.97 32.64 0.50 1.00 -5.45
------
48.18
|
winning pts = 137.0192 losing points = -88.8365
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------