Cedar Valley
W-L: (13- 8) PR = 82.4428Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 304 A Westlake ( 1-18, 77.7) 18- 7 305 H Pleasant Grove ( 9- 9, 85.4) 7-11 307 A Payson (12- 8, 83.3) 11- 9 312 H West Jordan (11- 8, 86.7) 8-19 319 H American Fork ( 6-12, 80.5) 17- 9 321 A Bear River (21- 0, 88.0) 4-16 326 A Jordan ( 5-11, 72.0) 20- 3 328 H Northridge ( 3-13, 75.2) 22-10 409 A Bountiful ( 6-11, 78.7) 18- 9 415 A Herriman ( 6-11, 82.6) 16-19 418 H Wasatch (11- 7, 83.5) 5- 6 423 A Timpview ( 2-13, 76.4) 16- 4 430 H Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 4-14 502 H Spanish Fork ( 3-12, 77.5) 18- 8 505 A Alta ( 7-11, 81.5) 7-15 507 A Springville ( 7- 9, 78.3) 15- 6 509 A Maple Mountain ( 7-13, 80.3) 15-12 513 H Timpview ( 2-13, 76.4) 10- 9 515 A Viewmont (15- 4, 82.2) 12- 9 517 A Box Elder (11-10, 82.1) 16-14 520 A Park City (18- 0, 99.9) 1-17
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
304 A Westlake 18- 7 11 4 0.78
305 H Pleasant Grove 7-11 -4 -2 -1.61
307 A Payson 11- 9 2 -1 + 3.44
312 H West Jordan 8-19 -11 -4 -1.29
319 H American Fork 17- 9 8 3 + 2.48
321 A Bear River 4-16 -12 -6 0.00
326 A Jordan 20- 3 17 10 0.00
328 H Northridge 22-10 12 8 0.00
409 A Bountiful 18- 9 9 3 1.76
415 A Herriman 16-19 -3 -1 - -2.31
418 H Wasatch 5- 6 -1 -1 -0.48
423 A Timpview 16- 4 12 6 0.00
430 H Salem Hills 4-14 -10 -6 0.00
502 H Spanish Fork 18- 8 10 6 0.00
505 A Alta 7-15 -8 0 -- -5.43
507 A Springville 15- 6 9 4 1.42
509 A Maple Mountain 15-12 3 2 1.38
513 H Timpview 10- 9 1 7 -- -4.00
515 A Viewmont 12- 9 3 0 + 3.31
517 A Box Elder 16-14 2 0 + 2.18
520 A Park City 1-17 -16 -18 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 505 A Alta 7-15 -8 0 -- -5.43 513 H Timpview 10- 9 1 7 -- -4.00 415 A Herriman 16-19 -3 -1 - -2.31 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 307 A Payson 11- 9 2 -1 + 3.44 319 H American Fork 17- 9 8 3 + 2.48 515 A Viewmont 12- 9 3 0 + 3.31 517 A Box Elder 16-14 2 0 + 2.18 |
Cedar Valley Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alta | Alta | Alta | ||
| American Fork | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Bear River | Bear River | Bear River | ||
| Bingham | Bingham | Bingham 6- 0 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Bonneville | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 5- 1 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Bountiful | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Box Elder | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Brighton | Brighton | Brighton 4- 2 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Canyon View | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Cedar | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Clearfield | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 6- 1)( 5- 2) | Cedar Valley | |
| Copper Hills | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 6- 2)( 5- 3) | Cedar Valley | |
| Corner Canyon | Corner Canyon | Corner Canyon 3- 3 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Crimson Cliffs | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cedar Valley | |
| Davis | Davis | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 2) | Davis | |
| Desert Hills | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| East | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 4) | Cedar Valley | |
| Farmington | Farmington | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 1) | Farmington | |
| Fremont | Fremont | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Fremont | |
| Green Canyon | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Cedar Valley | |
| Herriman | Herriman | Herriman | ||
| Highland | Highland | Highland 4- 2 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Hillcrest | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 4- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Hurricane | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Jordan | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Juan Diego Catholic | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Judge Memorial | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) | Cedar Valley | |
| Layton | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Cedar Valley | |
| Lehi | Lehi | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) | Lehi | |
| Logan | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Lone Peak | Lone Peak | Lone Peak 5- 1 vs 3- 3 | ||
| Maple Mountain | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Mountain Crest | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Cedar Valley | |
| Mountain Ridge | Mountain Ridge | Mountain Ridge 5- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Mountain View | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 4- 1 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Northridge | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Olympus | Olympus | Olympus 4- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Orem | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 5- 1 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Park City | Park City | Park City | ||
| Payson | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Pine View | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Pleasant Grove | Pleasant Grove | Pleasant Grove | ||
| Provo | Provo | insuffient: ( 4- 2)( 5- 1) | Provo | |
| Ridgeline | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Cedar Valley | |
| Riverton | Riverton | Riverton 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Roy | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Salem Hills | Salem Hills | Salem Hills | ||
| Sky View | Cedar Valley | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Cedar Valley | |
| Skyline | Skyline | Skyline 3- 3 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Skyridge | Skyridge | insuffient: ( 6- 2)( 7- 1) | Skyridge | |
| Snow Canyon | Cedar Valley | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Cedar Valley | |
| Spanish Fork | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Springville | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Syracuse | Syracuse | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 1) | Syracuse | |
| Timpanogos | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 5- 0 vs 3- 2 | ||
| Timpview | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Uintah | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Viewmont | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Wasatch | Wasatch | Wasatch | ||
| Waterford | Waterford | insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 4- 2) | Waterford | |
| Weber | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| West | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 4) | Cedar Valley | |
| West Field | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| West Jordan | West Jordan | West Jordan | ||
| Westlake | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Woods Cross | Woods Cross | tied - ( 6- 0) ( 6- 0) | Woods Cross |
PowerWise = 40
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 17.79
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Westlake ( 1-18, 77.7) 18- 7 -22.23 15.72 0.55 0.85 13.78
0 H Pleasant Grove ( 9- 9, 85.4) 7-11 -14.52 23.43 -0.55 0.85 -12.77
0 A Payson (12- 8, 83.3) 11- 9 -16.56 21.38 0.55 0.85 18.58
0 H West Jordan (11- 8, 86.7) 8-19 -13.19 24.75 -0.55 0.85 -11.64
0 H American Fork ( 6-12, 80.5) 17- 9 -19.43 18.52 -0.55 0.85 15.22
0 A Bear River (21- 0, 88.0) 4-16 -11.86 26.08 0.55 0.85 -9.59
0 A Jordan ( 5-11, 72.0) 20- 3 -27.88 10.07 0.55 0.85 8.99
0 H Northridge ( 3-13, 75.2) 22-10 -24.68 13.27 -0.55 0.85 10.78
0 A Bountiful ( 6-11, 78.7) 18- 9 -21.25 16.70 0.55 0.85 14.61
0 A Herriman ( 6-11, 82.6) 16-19 -17.32 20.63 0.55 0.85 -14.21
0 H Wasatch (11- 7, 83.5) 5- 6 -16.39 21.55 -0.55 0.85 -14.35
0 A Timpview ( 2-13, 76.4) 16- 4 -23.51 14.43 0.55 0.85 12.69
0 H Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 4-14 -11.24 26.71 -0.55 0.85 -9.99
0 H Spanish Fork ( 3-12, 77.5) 18- 8 -22.44 15.51 -0.55 0.85 12.67
0 A Alta ( 7-11, 81.5) 7-15 -18.44 19.51 0.55 0.85 -15.16
0 A Springville ( 7- 9, 78.3) 15- 6 -21.59 16.36 0.55 0.85 14.33
0 A Maple Mountain ( 7-13, 80.3) 15-12 -19.62 18.33 0.55 0.85 15.99
0 H Timpview ( 2-13, 76.4) 10- 9 -23.51 14.43 -0.55 0.85 11.76
0 A Viewmont (15- 4, 82.2) 12- 9 -17.70 20.25 0.55 0.85 17.62
0 A Box Elder (11-10, 82.1) 16-14 -17.82 20.12 0.55 0.85 17.51
0 A Park City (18- 0, 99.9) 1-17 -0.00 37.95 0.55 0.85 -0.46
------
96.39
|
winning pts = 184.5551 losing points = -88.1627
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------