Spanish Fork
W-L: ( 3-12) PR = 77.4600
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
313 A Payson (12- 8, 83.3) 1-21
317 A Timpanogos (12- 6, 79.5) 3-17
320 H Pleasant Grove ( 9- 9, 85.4) 3-18
326 H Herriman ( 6-11, 82.6) 5-15
411 H Mountain View ( 0-15, 66.4) 19- 3
418 H Timpview ( 2-13, 76.4) 12-11
421 H Hurricane (13- 4, 78.1) 10- 7
423 H Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 3-15
425 A Wasatch (11- 7, 83.5) 7- 9
428 A Provo (16- 4, 83.7) 5-18
430 H Springville ( 7- 9, 78.3) 9-10
502 A Cedar Valley (13- 8, 82.4) 8-18
505 A Westlake ( 1-18, 77.7) 5- 6
507 A Maple Mountain ( 7-13, 80.3) 9-15
513 A Maple Mountain ( 7-13, 80.3) 10-15
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
313 A Payson 1-21 -20 -6 0.00
317 A Timpanogos 3-17 -14 -3 - -2.38
320 H Pleasant Grove 3-18 -15 -7 0.00
326 H Herriman 5-15 -10 -5 -0.43
411 H Mountain View 19- 3 16 12 0.00
418 H Timpview 12-11 1 2 -0.62
421 H Hurricane 10- 7 3 0 + 3.05
423 H Salem Hills 3-15 -12 -11 0.00
425 A Wasatch 7- 9 -2 -7 + 3.00
428 A Provo 5-18 -13 -7 0.00
430 H Springville 9-10 -1 0 -0.70
502 A Cedar Valley 8-18 -10 -6 0.00
505 A Westlake 5- 6 -1 -1 -0.24
507 A Maple Mountain 9-15 -6 -3 -1.63
513 A Maple Mountain 10-15 -5 -3 -1.63
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
317 A Timpanogos 3-17 -14 -3 - -2.38
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
421 H Hurricane 10- 7 3 0 + 3.05
425 A Wasatch 7- 9 -2 -7 + 3.00
|
Spanish Fork Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
Alta |
Alta |
|
Alta   3- 1 vs 1- 3 |
|
American Fork |
American Fork |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 4)( 1- 3) |
American Fork |
Bear River |
Bear River |
|
Bear River   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Bingham |
Bingham |
|
Bingham   4- 0 vs 0- 4 |
|
Bonneville |
Spanish Fork |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Spanish Fork |
Bountiful |
Bountiful |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Bountiful |
Box Elder |
Box Elder |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 1) |
Box Elder |
Brighton |
Brighton |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Brighton |
Canyon View |
Spanish Fork |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Spanish Fork |
Cedar |
Spanish Fork |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Spanish Fork |
Cedar Valley |
Cedar Valley |
Cedar Valley |
 
| |
Clearfield |
Clearfield |
|
Clearfield   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
Copper Hills |
Copper Hills |
|
Copper Hills   4- 1 vs 0- 5 |
|
Corner Canyon |
Corner Canyon |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Corner Canyon |
Crimson Cliffs |
Spanish Fork |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Spanish Fork |
Davis |
Davis |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Davis |
Desert Hills |
Spanish Fork |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Spanish Fork |
East |
Spanish Fork |
|
 
| Spanish Fork |
Farmington |
Farmington |
|
 
| Farmington |
Fremont |
Fremont |
|
 
| Fremont |
Green Canyon |
Spanish Fork |
|
 
| Spanish Fork |
Herriman |
Herriman |
Herriman |
 
| |
Highland |
Highland |
|
Highland   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
Hillcrest |
Spanish Fork |
|
tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 2) |
Spanish Fork |
Hurricane |
Spanish Fork |
Spanish Fork |
 
| |
Jordan |
Spanish Fork |
|
tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) |
Spanish Fork |
Juan Diego Catholic |
Spanish Fork |
|
tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) |
Spanish Fork |
Judge Memorial |
Judge Memorial |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) |
Judge Memorial |
Layton |
Spanish Fork |
|
 
| Spanish Fork |
Lehi |
Lehi |
|
Lehi   4- 0 vs 1- 3 |
|
Logan |
Spanish Fork |
|
 
| Spanish Fork |
Lone Peak |
Lone Peak |
|
Lone Peak   5- 1 vs 1- 5 |
|
Maple Mountain |
Maple Mountain |
Maple Mountain |
 
| |
Mountain Crest |
Spanish Fork |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) |
Spanish Fork |
Mountain Ridge |
Mountain Ridge |
|
Mountain Ridge   4- 0 vs 0- 4 |
|
Mountain View |
Spanish Fork |
Spanish Fork |
 
| |
Northridge |
Spanish Fork |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) |
Spanish Fork |
Olympus |
Olympus |
|
Olympus   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Orem |
Spanish Fork |
|
tied - ( 2- 5) ( 2- 5) |
Spanish Fork |
Park City |
Park City |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Park City |
Payson |
Payson |
Payson |
 
| |
Pine View |
Spanish Fork |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Spanish Fork |
Pleasant Grove |
Pleasant Grove |
Pleasant Grove |
 
| |
Provo |
Provo |
Provo |
 
| |
Ridgeline |
Ridgeline |
|
 
| Ridgeline |
Riverton |
Riverton |
|
Riverton   3- 0 vs 0- 3 |
|
Roy |
Spanish Fork |
|
 
| Spanish Fork |
Salem Hills |
Salem Hills |
Salem Hills |
 
| |
Sky View |
Spanish Fork |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Spanish Fork |
Skyline |
Skyline |
|
Skyline   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
Skyridge |
Skyridge |
|
Skyridge   5- 1 vs 0- 6 |
|
Snow Canyon |
Spanish Fork |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) |
Spanish Fork |
Springville |
Springville |
Springville |
 
| |
Syracuse |
Syracuse |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Syracuse |
Timpanogos |
Timpanogos |
Timpanogos |
 
| |
Timpview |
Spanish Fork |
Spanish Fork |
 
| |
Uintah |
Spanish Fork |
|
tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) |
Spanish Fork |
Viewmont |
Viewmont |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Viewmont |
Wasatch |
Wasatch |
Wasatch |
 
| |
Waterford |
Waterford |
|
Waterford   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Weber |
Weber |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Weber |
West |
Spanish Fork |
|
 
| Spanish Fork |
West Field |
Spanish Fork |
|
 
| Spanish Fork |
West Jordan |
West Jordan |
|
West Jordan   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
Westlake |
Westlake |
Westlake |
 
| |
Woods Cross |
Woods Cross |
|
Woods Cross   3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
|
PowerWise = 25

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 17.79
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Payson (12- 8, 83.3) 1-21 -16.56 21.38 0.55 1.19 -18.99
0 A Timpanogos (12- 6, 79.5) 3-17 -20.37 17.58 0.55 1.19 -23.50
0 H Pleasant Grove ( 9- 9, 85.4) 3-18 -14.52 23.43 -0.55 1.19 -17.87
0 H Herriman ( 6-11, 82.6) 5-15 -17.32 20.63 -0.55 1.19 -21.19
0 H Mountain View ( 0-15, 66.4) 19- 3 -33.54 4.41 -0.55 1.19 4.57
0 H Timpview ( 2-13, 76.4) 12-11 -23.51 14.43 -0.55 1.19 16.47
0 H Hurricane (13- 4, 78.1) 10- 7 -21.84 16.10 -0.55 1.19 18.45
0 H Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 3-15 -11.24 26.71 -0.55 1.19 -13.98
0 A Wasatch (11- 7, 83.5) 7- 9 -16.39 21.55 0.55 1.19 -18.79
0 A Provo (16- 4, 83.7) 5-18 -16.16 21.79 0.55 1.19 -18.51
0 H Springville ( 7- 9, 78.3) 9-10 -21.59 16.36 -0.55 1.19 -26.25
0 A Cedar Valley (13- 8, 82.4) 8-18 -17.46 20.49 0.55 1.19 -20.05
0 A Westlake ( 1-18, 77.7) 5- 6 -22.23 15.72 0.55 1.19 -25.71
0 A Maple Mountain ( 7-13, 80.3) 9-15 -19.62 18.33 0.55 1.19 -22.62
0 A Maple Mountain ( 7-13, 80.3) 10-15 -19.62 18.33 0.55 1.19 -22.62
------
-210.62
|
winning pts = 39.4926 losing points = -250.1108
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------