Maple Mountain
W-L: ( 7-13) PR = 80.2791Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 303 A Herriman ( 6-11, 82.6) 8-12 308 A Clearfield (13- 7, 80.4) 4- 5 308 A Mountain Crest ( 4-14, 73.7) 15- 0 308 A Timpanogos (12- 6, 79.5) 10- 4 310 H Springville ( 7- 9, 78.3) 12- 4 317 A Lone Peak (16- 4, 88.9) 4-20 320 H Juan Diego Catholic ( 1-13, 71.3) 22- 2 328 H Skyridge (17- 4, 88.8) 6-17 409 H Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 3-11 414 H Highland (13- 5, 84.7) 6-15 418 H Springville ( 7- 9, 78.3) 10-11 421 A Brighton (13- 6, 88.9) 7-16 423 A Wasatch (11- 7, 83.5) 10-17 425 A Timpview ( 2-13, 76.4) 9- 5 502 A Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 2-14 506 H Copper Hills ( 7-10, 80.4) 11-13 507 H Spanish Fork ( 3-12, 77.5) 15- 9 509 H Cedar Valley (13- 8, 82.4) 12-15 513 H Spanish Fork ( 3-12, 77.5) 15-10 515 H Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 5-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
303 A Herriman 8-12 -4 -3 -1.15
308 A Clearfield 4- 5 -1 -1 -0.34
308 A Mountain Crest 15- 0 15 6 0.00
308 A Timpanogos 10- 4 6 0 ++ 4.80
310 H Springville 12- 4 8 3 + 2.49
317 A Lone Peak 4-20 -16 -9 0.00
320 H Juan Diego Catholic 22- 2 20 10 0.00
328 H Skyridge 6-17 -11 -8 0.00
409 H Salem Hills 3-11 -8 -8 0.00
414 H Highland 6-15 -9 -4 -1.10
418 H Springville 10-11 -1 3 - -3.51
421 A Brighton 7-16 -9 -9 0.00
423 A Wasatch 10-17 -7 -4 -1.22
425 A Timpview 9- 5 4 3 0.66
502 A Salem Hills 2-14 -12 -9 0.00
506 H Copper Hills 11-13 -2 0 - -2.48
507 H Spanish Fork 15- 9 6 3 1.63
509 H Cedar Valley 12-15 -3 -2 -1.38
513 H Spanish Fork 15-10 5 3 1.63
515 H Salem Hills 5-12 -7 -8 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 418 H Springville 10-11 -1 3 - -3.51 506 H Copper Hills 11-13 -2 0 - -2.48 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 308 A Timpanogos 10- 4 6 0 ++ 4.80 310 H Springville 12- 4 8 3 + 2.49 |
Maple Mountain Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alta | Alta | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Alta | |
| American Fork | American Fork | tied - ( 1- 4) ( 1- 4) | American Fork | |
| Bear River | Bear River | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Bear River | |
| Bingham | Bingham | Bingham 4- 2 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Bonneville | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 2) | Maple Mountain | |
| Bountiful | Maple Mountain | insuffient: ( 0- 5)( 1- 4) | Maple Mountain | |
| Box Elder | Box Elder | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 2) | Box Elder | |
| Brighton | Brighton | Brighton | ||
| Canyon View | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Maple Mountain | |
| Cedar | Maple Mountain | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Maple Mountain | |
| Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Clearfield | Clearfield | Clearfield | ||
| Copper Hills | Copper Hills | Copper Hills | ||
| Corner Canyon | Corner Canyon | Corner Canyon 3- 3 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Crimson Cliffs | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain | ||
| Davis | Davis | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Davis | |
| Desert Hills | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Maple Mountain | |
| East | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Maple Mountain | |
| Farmington | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Fremont | Fremont | Fremont | ||
| Green Canyon | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Maple Mountain | |
| Herriman | Herriman | Herriman | ||
| Highland | Highland | Highland | ||
| Hillcrest | Maple Mountain | insuffient: ( 2- 5)( 1- 5) | Maple Mountain | |
| Hurricane | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain 2- 2 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Jordan | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Juan Diego Catholic | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain | ||
| Judge Memorial | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Maple Mountain | |
| Layton | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Maple Mountain | |
| Lehi | Lehi | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Lehi | |
| Logan | Maple Mountain | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Maple Mountain | |
| Lone Peak | Lone Peak | Lone Peak | ||
| Mountain Crest | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain | ||
| Mountain Ridge | Mountain Ridge | Mountain Ridge 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Mountain View | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Northridge | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Maple Mountain | |
| Olympus | Olympus | Olympus 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Orem | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain 4- 2 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Park City | Park City | Park City 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Payson | Payson | tied - ( 2- 3) ( 2- 3) | Payson | |
| Pine View | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain | ||
| Pleasant Grove | Pleasant Grove | Pleasant Grove 4- 2 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Provo | Provo | tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) | Provo | |
| Ridgeline | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Maple Mountain | |
| Riverton | Riverton | Riverton 4- 1 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Roy | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Maple Mountain | |
| Salem Hills | Salem Hills | Salem Hills | ||
| Sky View | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Maple Mountain | |
| Skyline | Skyline | Skyline 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Skyridge | Skyridge | Skyridge | ||
| Snow Canyon | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Maple Mountain | |
| Spanish Fork | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain | ||
| Springville | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 3- 6) ( 3- 6) | Maple Mountain | |
| Syracuse | Syracuse | Syracuse 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Timpanogos | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain | ||
| Timpview | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain | ||
| Uintah | Maple Mountain | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | Maple Mountain | |
| Viewmont | Viewmont | Viewmont 3- 2 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Wasatch | Wasatch | Wasatch | ||
| Waterford | Waterford | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Waterford | |
| Weber | Weber | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Weber | |
| West | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Maple Mountain | |
| West Field | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Maple Mountain | |
| West Jordan | West Jordan | West Jordan 3- 3 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Westlake | Maple Mountain | tied - ( 1- 5) ( 1- 5) | Maple Mountain | |
| Woods Cross | Woods Cross | Woods Cross 3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
PowerWise = 32
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 17.79
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Herriman ( 6-11, 82.6) 8-12 -17.32 20.63 0.55 0.89 -14.92
0 A Clearfield (13- 7, 80.4) 4- 5 -19.51 18.44 0.55 0.89 -16.87
0 A Mountain Crest ( 4-14, 73.7) 15- 0 -26.15 11.79 0.55 0.89 10.98
0 A Timpanogos (12- 6, 79.5) 10- 4 -20.37 17.58 0.55 0.89 16.13
0 H Springville ( 7- 9, 78.3) 12- 4 -21.59 16.36 -0.55 0.89 14.07
0 A Lone Peak (16- 4, 88.9) 4-20 -10.99 26.96 0.55 0.89 -9.29
0 H Juan Diego Cat ( 1-13, 71.3) 22- 2 -28.60 9.34 -0.55 0.89 7.82
0 H Skyridge (17- 4, 88.8) 6-17 -11.09 26.86 -0.55 0.89 -10.35
0 H Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 3-11 -11.24 26.71 -0.55 0.89 -10.49
0 H Highland (13- 5, 84.7) 6-15 -15.18 22.77 -0.55 0.89 -13.99
0 H Springville ( 7- 9, 78.3) 10-11 -21.59 16.36 -0.55 0.89 -19.69
0 A Brighton (13- 6, 88.9) 7-16 -11.03 26.92 0.55 0.89 -9.32
0 A Wasatch (11- 7, 83.5) 10-17 -16.39 21.55 0.55 0.89 -14.09
0 A Timpview ( 2-13, 76.4) 9- 5 -23.51 14.43 0.55 0.89 13.33
0 A Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 2-14 -11.24 26.71 0.55 0.89 -9.51
0 H Copper Hills ( 7-10, 80.4) 11-13 -19.55 18.40 -0.55 0.89 -17.88
0 H Spanish Fork ( 3-12, 77.5) 15- 9 -22.44 15.51 -0.55 0.89 13.31
0 H Cedar Valley (13- 8, 82.4) 12-15 -17.46 20.49 -0.55 0.89 -16.02
0 H Spanish Fork ( 3-12, 77.5) 15-10 -22.44 15.51 -0.55 0.89 13.31
0 H Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 5-12 -11.24 26.71 -0.55 0.89 -10.49
------
-83.96
|
winning pts = 88.9370 losing points = -172.8934
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------