---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:01 PDT

safe3step girls Syracuse 1
  
Syracuse              
W-L: (12- 7) PR = 86.0887

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 311 A Park City (18- 0, 99.9) 0-15 312 A Mountain Crest ( 4-14, 73.7) 20- 4 313 H Roy ( 3-13, 75.1) 13- 4 320 H Copper Hills ( 7-10, 80.4) 13- 4 324 H Westlake ( 1-18, 77.7) 18- 1 327 A Clearfield (13- 7, 80.4) 11- 3 408 H Davis (13- 7, 88.5) 5-11 410 A Layton ( 3-14, 77.4) 15- 3 415 A Farmington (18- 3, 93.1) 5-18 417 H Fremont ( 9- 8, 86.5) 8- 7 422 H Weber ( 4-14, 80.7) 18- 9 424 A Davis (13- 7, 88.5) 9-12 428 A Bonneville ( 4-14, 76.8) 20- 6 429 H Layton ( 3-14, 77.4) 15- 7 501 H Farmington (18- 3, 93.1) 3-20 506 A Fremont ( 9- 8, 86.5) 10-13 508 A Weber ( 4-14, 80.7) 16- 7 515 A Lehi (10- 8, 84.7) 13- 7 517 H Mountain Ridge (16- 3, 92.9) 6-18

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   311 A Park City               0-15     -15   -14           0.00
   312 A Mountain Crest         20- 4      16    12           0.00
   313 H Roy                    13- 4       9    11           0.00
   320 H Copper Hills           13- 4       9     6           0.00
   324 H Westlake               18- 1      17     9           0.00
   327 A Clearfield             11- 3       8     5           0.00
   408 H Davis                   5-11      -6    -2    -     -3.10
   410 A Layton                 15- 3      12     8           0.00
   415 A Farmington              5-18     -13    -8           0.00
   417 H Fremont                 8- 7       1     0           0.87
   422 H Weber                  18- 9       9     6           0.00
   424 A Davis                   9-12      -3    -3           0.00
   428 A Bonneville             20- 6      14     9           0.00
   429 H Layton                 15- 7       8     9           0.00
   501 H Farmington              3-20     -17    -6           0.00
   506 A Fremont                10-13      -3    -1    -     -2.03
   508 A Weber                  16- 7       9     5           0.12
   515 A Lehi                   13- 7       6     1    ++     4.18
   517 H Mountain Ridge          6-18     -12    -6           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   408 H Davis                   5-11      -6    -2    -     -3.10
   506 A Fremont                10-13      -3    -1    -     -2.03

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   515 A Lehi                   13- 7       6     1    ++     4.18

Syracuse Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alta Syracuse tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Syracuse
American Fork Syracuse insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Syracuse
Bear River Bear River tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Bear River
Bingham Bingham insuffient: ( 4- 3)( 3- 3) Bingham
Bonneville Syracuse Syracuse  
Bountiful Syracuse insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) Syracuse
Box Elder Syracuse Syracuse   5- 2 vs 3- 3
Brighton Brighton insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) Brighton
Canyon View Syracuse tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Syracuse
Cedar Syracuse   Syracuse
Cedar Valley Syracuse tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) Syracuse
Clearfield Syracuse Syracuse  
Copper Hills Syracuse Syracuse  
Corner Canyon Syracuse insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 4) Syracuse
Crimson Cliffs Syracuse   Syracuse
Davis Davis Davis  
Desert Hills Syracuse   Syracuse
East Syracuse insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Syracuse
Farmington Farmington Farmington  
Fremont Fremont tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) Fremont
Green Canyon Syracuse Syracuse   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Herriman Syracuse insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Syracuse
Highland Syracuse tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Syracuse
Hillcrest Syracuse insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Syracuse
Hurricane Syracuse   Syracuse
Jordan Syracuse   Syracuse
Juan Diego Catholic Syracuse   Syracuse
Judge Memorial Syracuse   Syracuse
Layton Syracuse Syracuse  
Lehi Syracuse Syracuse  
Logan Syracuse Syracuse   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Lone Peak Lone Peak tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) Lone Peak
Maple Mountain Syracuse Syracuse   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Mountain Crest Syracuse Syracuse  
Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge  
Mountain View Syracuse   Syracuse
Northridge Syracuse Syracuse   5- 0 vs 0- 5
Olympus Olympus Olympus   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Orem Syracuse   Syracuse
Park City Park City Park City  
Payson Syracuse   Syracuse
Pine View Syracuse   Syracuse
Pleasant Grove Syracuse insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Syracuse
Provo Syracuse insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Syracuse
Ridgeline Syracuse tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Syracuse
Riverton Riverton insuffient: ( 3- 4)( 4- 2) Riverton
Roy Syracuse Syracuse  
Salem Hills Salem Hills insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) Salem Hills
Sky View Syracuse insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Syracuse
Skyline Syracuse tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Syracuse
Skyridge Skyridge tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 1) Skyridge
Snow Canyon Syracuse   Syracuse
Spanish Fork Syracuse insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Syracuse
Springville Syracuse Syracuse   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Timpanogos Syracuse tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Syracuse
Timpview Syracuse insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Syracuse
Uintah Syracuse   Syracuse
Viewmont Syracuse tied - ( 6- 0) ( 6- 0) Syracuse
Wasatch Syracuse tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Syracuse
Waterford Waterford tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Waterford
Weber Syracuse Syracuse  
West Syracuse tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Syracuse
West Field Syracuse Syracuse   3- 0 vs 1- 2
West Jordan West Jordan tied - ( 2- 3) ( 2- 2) West Jordan
Westlake Syracuse Syracuse  
Woods Cross Syracuse tied - ( 5- 1) ( 5- 1) Syracuse

PowerWise = 51


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 17.79

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Park City       (18- 0, 99.9)     0-15       -0.00      37.95       0.55         0.94            -0.51
   0 A Mountain Crest  ( 4-14, 73.7)    20- 4      -26.15      11.79       0.55         0.94            11.56
   0 H Roy             ( 3-13, 75.1)    13- 4      -24.75      13.19      -0.55         0.94            11.84
   0 H Copper Hills    ( 7-10, 80.4)    13- 4      -19.55      18.40      -0.55         0.94            16.71
   0 H Westlake        ( 1-18, 77.7)    18- 1      -22.23      15.72      -0.55         0.94            14.21
   0 A Clearfield      (13- 7, 80.4)    11- 3      -19.51      18.44       0.55         0.94            17.78
   0 H Davis           (13- 7, 88.5)     5-11      -11.36      26.59      -0.55         0.94           -11.15
   0 A Layton          ( 3-14, 77.4)    15- 3      -22.47      15.48       0.55         0.94            15.01
   0 A Farmington      (18- 3, 93.1)     5-18       -6.84      31.11       0.55         0.94            -5.89
   0 H Fremont         ( 9- 8, 86.5)     8- 7      -13.39      24.55      -0.55         0.94            22.48
   0 H Weber           ( 4-14, 80.7)    18- 9      -19.24      18.71      -0.55         0.94            17.00
   0 A Davis           (13- 7, 88.5)     9-12      -11.36      26.59       0.55         0.94           -10.12
   0 A Bonneville      ( 4-14, 76.8)    20- 6      -23.15      14.80       0.55         0.94            14.37
   0 H Layton          ( 3-14, 77.4)    15- 7      -22.47      15.48      -0.55         0.94            13.98
   0 H Farmington      (18- 3, 93.1)     3-20       -6.84      31.11      -0.55         0.94            -6.92
   0 A Fremont         ( 9- 8, 86.5)    10-13      -13.39      24.55       0.55         0.94           -12.03
   0 A Weber           ( 4-14, 80.7)    16- 7      -19.24      18.71       0.55         0.94            18.03
   0 A Lehi            (10- 8, 84.7)    13- 7      -15.18      22.77       0.55         0.94            21.83
   0 H Mountain Ridge  (16- 3, 92.9)     6-18       -6.98      30.97      -0.55         0.94            -7.05
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       141.13

winning pts = 194.7989 losing points = -53.6738

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------