West Bend
W-L: ( 4- 8) PR = 86.8106Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 407 A Bay Port (11- 6, 88.7) 6- 9 411 A Neenah (10- 6, 86.3) 8- 9 414 A Cedarburg ( 8- 5, 89.5) 7-10 417 H Hamilton ( 4-13, 82.6) 15- 7 421 H Whitefish Bay (15- 4, 93.6) 5-18 424 A Appleton ( 7- 9, 88.1) 7- 6 428 A Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 11- 7 505 H Cedarburg ( 8- 5, 89.5) 8-11 512 A Whitefish Bay (15- 4, 93.6) 6-17 519 H Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 12- 9 521 A Franklin ( 5-10, 87.7) 11-14 529 A Arrowhead (11- 5, 94.5) 3-15
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
407 A Bay Port 6- 9 -3 -2 -0.54
411 A Neenah 8- 9 -1 0 -0.93
414 A Cedarburg 7-10 -3 -3 0.30
417 H Hamilton 15- 7 8 5 0.18
421 H Whitefish Bay 5-18 -13 -6 0.00
424 A Appleton 7- 6 1 -2 + 2.91
428 A Homestead 11- 7 4 3 1.37
505 H Cedarburg 8-11 -3 -2 -0.91
512 A Whitefish Bay 6-17 -11 -7 0.00
519 H Homestead 12- 9 3 4 -0.84
521 A Franklin 11-14 -3 -1 -1.54
529 A Arrowhead 3-15 -12 -8 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 424 A Appleton 7- 6 1 -2 + 2.91 |
West Bend Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appleton | West Bend | West Bend | ||
| Arrowhead | Arrowhead | Arrowhead | ||
| Bay Port | Bay Port | Bay Port | ||
| Brookfield | Brookfield | Brookfield 6- 0 vs 3- 3 | ||
| Cedarburg | Cedarburg | Cedarburg | ||
| Central Wisconsin | Central Wisconsin | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Central Wisconsin | |
| De Pere | West Bend | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | West Bend | |
| DeForest | West Bend | West Bend | ||
| Divine Savior | Divine Savior | insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 4- 2) | Divine Savior | |
| Franklin | Franklin | Franklin | ||
| Hamilton | West Bend | West Bend | ||
| Homestead | West Bend | West Bend | ||
| Hudson | Hudson | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Hudson | |
| Janesville | West Bend | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | West Bend | |
| Kenosha | Kenosha | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Kenosha | |
| Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Kimberly | West Bend | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | West Bend | |
| Madison | Madison | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Madison | |
| Middleton | West Bend | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | West Bend | |
| Mukwonago | Mukwonago | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | Mukwonago | |
| Muskego | Muskego | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Muskego | |
| Neenah | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | Notre Dame 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Oak Creek | West Bend | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | West Bend | |
| Oconomowoc | Oconomowoc | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Oconomowoc | |
| Oregon | Oregon | Oregon 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Pulaski | West Bend | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | West Bend | |
| Sun Prairie | West Bend | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | West Bend | |
| Superior | West Bend | West Bend 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| University Milwaukee | University Milwaukee | University Milwaukee 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Verona | Verona | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Verona | |
| Waukesha | Waukesha | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Waukesha | |
| Waunakee | Waunakee | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Waunakee | |
| Wauwatosa | West Bend | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | West Bend | |
| Whitefish Bay | Whitefish Bay | Whitefish Bay |
PowerWise = 13
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.72
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Bay Port (11- 6, 88.7) 6- 9 -11.23 9.67 0.60 1.31 -13.92
0 A Neenah (10- 6, 86.3) 8- 9 -13.62 7.28 0.60 1.31 -17.06
0 A Cedarburg ( 8- 5, 89.5) 7-10 -10.40 10.51 0.60 1.31 -12.83
0 H Hamilton ( 4-13, 82.6) 15- 7 -17.30 3.60 -0.60 1.31 3.92
0 H Whitefish Bay (15- 4, 93.6) 5-18 -6.33 14.57 -0.60 1.31 -9.08
0 A Appleton ( 7- 9, 88.1) 7- 6 -11.79 9.11 0.60 1.31 12.73
0 A Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 11- 7 -16.32 4.58 0.60 1.31 6.79
0 H Cedarburg ( 8- 5, 89.5) 8-11 -10.40 10.51 -0.60 1.31 -14.41
0 A Whitefish Bay (15- 4, 93.6) 6-17 -6.33 14.57 0.60 1.31 -7.50
0 H Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 12- 9 -16.32 4.58 -0.60 1.31 5.21
0 A Franklin ( 5-10, 87.7) 11-14 -12.24 8.66 0.60 1.31 -15.24
0 A Arrowhead (11- 5, 94.5) 3-15 -5.41 15.49 0.60 1.31 -6.30
------
-67.69
|
winning pts = 28.6583 losing points = -96.3451
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------