Catawba Ridge
W-L: ( 9- 6) PR = 85.5915Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 227 H Woodmont ( 4- 7, 74.5) 22- 0 303 H AC Flora ( 9- 7, 82.2) 20- 8 306 A Blythewood ( 4-10, 79.2) 18- 6 311 H Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 15- 5 313 H River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 14- 5 321 A White Knoll ( 2-11, 73.3) 19- 1 324 H Fort Mill ( 8- 2, 89.1) 12-14 327 A Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 6-11 401 A Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 12-17 403 A Fort Mill ( 8- 2, 89.1) 7- 8 407 H Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 14- 5 408 A Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 3-13 410 H Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 12- 4 422 A Greenville ( 8- 5, 83.1) 15- 7 425 A TL Hanna (16- 1, 88.6) 4- 9
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
227 H Woodmont 22- 0 22 12 0.00
303 H AC Flora 20- 8 12 4 0.99
306 A Blythewood 18- 6 12 6 0.00
311 H Eastside 15- 5 10 5 0.00
313 H River Bluff 14- 5 9 1 + 3.75
321 A White Knoll 19- 1 18 12 0.00
324 H Fort Mill 12-14 -2 -3 0.93
327 A Nation Ford 6-11 -5 4 --- -8.52
401 A Riverside 12-17 -5 -2 - -3.25
403 A Fort Mill 7- 8 -1 -4 + 3.17
407 H Nation Ford 14- 5 9 5 0.24
408 A Clover 3-13 -10 -1 - -3.88
410 H Clover 12- 4 8 0 ++ 4.88
422 A Greenville 15- 7 8 2 + 3.13
425 A TL Hanna 4- 9 -5 -4 -1.37
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 327 A Nation Ford 6-11 -5 4 --- -8.52 401 A Riverside 12-17 -5 -2 - -3.25 408 A Clover 3-13 -10 -1 - -3.88 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 410 H Clover 12- 4 8 0 ++ 4.88 313 H River Bluff 14- 5 9 1 + 3.75 403 A Fort Mill 7- 8 -1 -4 + 3.17 422 A Greenville 15- 7 8 2 + 3.13 |
Catawba Ridge Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Academic Magnet | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Aiken | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Ashley Hall | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Beaufort | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Bishop England | Bishop England | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bishop England | |
| Bluffton | Catawba Ridge | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Blythewood | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Boiling Springs | Catawba Ridge | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 1- 3) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Byrnes | Catawba Ridge | tied - ( 5- 2) ( 5- 1) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Carolina Forest | Catawba Ridge | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Chapin | Chapin | Chapin 5- 0 vs 3- 2 | ||
| Christ Church Episcopal | Christ Church Episcopal | tied - ( 5- 2) ( 5- 1) | Christ Church Episcopal | |
| Clover | Clover | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 1) | Clover | |
| Dorman | Catawba Ridge | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Dutch Fork | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge 6- 2 vs 4- 3 | ||
| Eastside | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Fort Mill | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Fountain Inn | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Greenville | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Heathwood Hall | Catawba Ridge | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Hillcrest | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Hilton Head | Hilton Head | Hilton Head | ||
| Irmo | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| James Island | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Legion Collegiate Academ | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Lexington | Lexington | insuffient: ( 4- 2)( 5- 0) | Lexington | |
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Lucy Beckham | |
| Mauldin | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| May River | Catawba Ridge | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Mid-Carolina | Catawba Ridge | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Myrtle Beach | Catawba Ridge | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Nation Ford | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge 6- 2 vs 1- 6 | ||
| North Myrtle Beach | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | ||
| Philip Simmons | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Pinewood Prep | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | ||
| Ridge View | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| River Bluff | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Riverside | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Socastee | Catawba Ridge | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Spartanburg | Spartanburg | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 0) | Spartanburg | |
| Spring Valley | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| St James | Catawba Ridge | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Catawba Ridge | |
| St Josephs Catholic | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| TL Hanna | TL Hanna | TL Hanna | ||
| Trinity Collegiate | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Waccamaw | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Wade Hampton | Catawba Ridge | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Wando | Wando | Wando | ||
| West Ashley | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Westside | Catawba Ridge | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Catawba Ridge | |
| White Knoll | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Woodmont | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge |
PowerWise = 41
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.58
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Woodmont ( 4- 7, 74.5) 22- 0 -25.37 8.30 -0.62 0.91 6.95
0 H AC Flora ( 9- 7, 82.2) 20- 8 -17.70 15.97 -0.62 0.91 13.90
0 A Blythewood ( 4-10, 79.2) 18- 6 -20.70 12.97 0.62 0.91 12.30
0 H Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 15- 5 -19.06 14.61 -0.62 0.91 12.67
0 H River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 14- 5 -14.94 18.73 -0.62 0.91 16.39
0 A White Knoll ( 2-11, 73.3) 19- 1 -26.57 7.09 0.62 0.91 6.98
0 H Fort Mill ( 8- 2, 89.1) 12-14 -10.76 22.91 -0.62 0.91 -10.30
0 A Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 6-11 -18.44 15.22 0.62 0.91 -16.14
0 A Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 12-17 -13.17 20.50 0.62 0.91 -11.36
0 A Fort Mill ( 8- 2, 89.1) 7- 8 -10.76 22.91 0.62 0.91 -9.18
0 H Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 14- 5 -18.44 15.22 -0.62 0.91 13.22
0 A Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 3-13 -13.80 19.86 0.62 0.91 -11.94
0 H Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 12- 4 -13.80 19.86 -0.62 0.91 17.42
0 A Greenville ( 8- 5, 83.1) 15- 7 -16.80 16.87 0.62 0.91 15.84
0 A TL Hanna (16- 1, 88.6) 4- 9 -11.30 22.37 0.62 0.91 -9.66
------
47.09
|
winning pts = 115.6720 losing points = -68.5844
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------