White Knoll
W-L: ( 6- 7) PR = 85.2999Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 227 H Heathwood Hall ( 9- 4, 88.1) 8- 9 301 H Clover (11- 2, 94.5) 3-19 303 H Lexington ( 7- 9, 89.9) 5-17 311 H Gilbert ( 0- 7, 78.0) 9- 5 313 H Chapin (10- 7, 93.5) 9-16 320 A Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 13-17 322 H Westside ( 0-16, 73.3) 18- 1 324 H Blythewood ( 7- 8, 84.0) 17-16 326 A Aiken ( 5- 6, 86.1) 16-12 403 A Spring Valley ( 9- 7, 81.7) 12- 3 405 A River Bluff ( 9- 6, 89.8) 12-16 410 H Philip Simmons ( 8- 6, 83.6) 12- 3 423 A Socastee ( 8- 8, 84.7) 13-16
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
227 H Heathwood Hall 8- 9 -1 -2 1.44
301 H Clover 3-19 -16 -9 0.00
303 H Lexington 5-17 -12 -4 -0.78
311 H Gilbert 9- 5 4 8 -1.00
313 H Chapin 9-16 -7 -8 0.00
320 A Dutch Fork 13-17 -4 0 - -3.66
322 H Westside 18- 1 17 12 0.00
324 H Blythewood 17-16 1 2 -0.68
326 A Aiken 16-12 4 -1 ++ 5.10
403 A Spring Valley 12- 3 9 3 1.71
405 A River Bluff 12-16 -4 -5 0.82
410 H Philip Simmons 12- 3 9 2 + 2.98
423 A Socastee 13-16 -3 0 - -3.31
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 320 A Dutch Fork 13-17 -4 0 - -3.66 423 A Socastee 13-16 -3 0 - -3.31 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 326 A Aiken 16-12 4 -1 ++ 5.10 410 H Philip Simmons 12- 3 9 2 + 2.98 |
White Knoll Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | AC Flora | AC Flora 7- 0 vs 2- 5 | ||
| Academic Magnet Char | White Knoll | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | White Knoll | |
| Aiken | White Knoll | White Knoll | ||
| Atlantic Collegiate | Atlantic Collegiate | Atlantic Collegiate | ||
| Beaufort | White Knoll | White Knoll 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Bishop England | Bishop England | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bishop England | |
| Bluffton | White Knoll | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | White Knoll | |
| Blythewood | White Knoll | White Knoll | ||
| Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Byrnes | Byrnes | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Byrnes | |
| Camden Military Acad | White Knoll | White Knoll 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Carolina Forest | Carolina Forest | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Carolina Forest | |
| Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Chapin | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Christ Church Episco | Christ Church Episco | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Christ Church Episco | |
| Clover | Clover | Clover | ||
| Dorman | Dorman | Dorman 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Eastside | Eastside | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Eastside | |
| Fort Mill | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 3- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Fox Creek | White Knoll | White Knoll 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Gilbert | White Knoll | White Knoll | ||
| Greenville | Greenville | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Greenville | |
| Hammond School | Hammond School | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Hammond School | |
| Heathwood Hall | Heathwood Hall | Heathwood Hall | ||
| Hillcrest | White Knoll | White Knoll | ||
| Hilton Head | Hilton Head | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Hilton Head | |
| Hilton Head Christia | White Knoll | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | White Knoll | |
| James Island Charter | James Island Charter | James Island Charter 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Laurence Manning Aca | White Knoll | White Knoll 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Legion Collegiate Ac | Legion Collegiate Ac | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Legion Collegiate Ac | |
| Lexington | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Lucy Beckham | |
| Mauldin | Mauldin | Mauldin 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| May River | May River | May River 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Myrtle Beach | White Knoll | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | White Knoll | |
| Nation Ford | Nation Ford | Nation Ford 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| North Myrtle Beach | White Knoll | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | White Knoll | |
| Oceanside Academy | Oceanside Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Oceanside Academy | |
| Philip Simmons | White Knoll | White Knoll | ||
| Porter-Gaud | Porter-Gaud | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Porter-Gaud | |
| River Bluff | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Riverside | Riverside | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Riverside | |
| Socastee | Socastee | Socastee | ||
| Spartanburg | Spartanburg | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Spartanburg | |
| Spring Valley | White Knoll | White Knoll | ||
| St James | White Knoll | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | White Knoll | |
| St Joseph Catholic | White Knoll | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | White Knoll | |
| TL Hanna | White Knoll | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | White Knoll | |
| Trinity Collegiate | White Knoll | White Knoll 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Waccamaw | White Knoll | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | White Knoll | |
| Wade Hampton | White Knoll | White Knoll 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Wando | Wando | Wando 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Westside | White Knoll | White Knoll | ||
| Woodmont | White Knoll | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | White Knoll |
PowerWise = 23
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.54
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Heathwood Hall ( 9- 4, 88.1) 8- 9 -11.83 14.77 -0.33 1.04 -12.67
0 H Clover (11- 2, 94.5) 3-19 -5.37 21.23 -0.33 1.04 -5.94
0 H Lexington ( 7- 9, 89.9) 5-17 -10.05 16.56 -0.33 1.04 -10.82
0 H Gilbert ( 0- 7, 78.0) 9- 5 -21.89 4.71 -0.33 1.04 4.56
0 H Chapin (10- 7, 93.5) 9-16 -6.37 20.24 -0.33 1.04 -6.98
0 A Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 13-17 -14.59 12.01 0.33 1.04 -14.85
0 H Westside ( 0-16, 73.3) 18- 1 -26.60 1.00 -0.33 1.04 0.69
0 H Blythewood ( 7- 8, 84.0) 17-16 -15.95 10.66 -0.33 1.04 10.76
0 A Aiken ( 5- 6, 86.1) 16-12 -13.83 12.77 0.33 1.04 13.66
0 A Spring Valley ( 9- 7, 81.7) 12- 3 -18.23 8.38 0.33 1.04 9.08
0 A River Bluff ( 9- 6, 89.8) 12-16 -10.11 16.49 0.33 1.04 -10.19
0 H Philip Simmons ( 8- 6, 83.6) 12- 3 -16.29 10.32 -0.33 1.04 10.40
0 A Socastee ( 8- 8, 84.7) 13-16 -15.25 11.36 0.33 1.04 -15.54
------
-27.85
|
winning pts = 49.1410 losing points = -76.9905
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------