---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 17:11 PDT

safe3step boys Weber 1
  
Weber                 
W-L: (11- 8) PR = 89.9048

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 303 H Green Canyon (10-10, 89.0) 4- 3 306 H Brighton (18- 3, 98.0) 5-18 311 A West Jordan ( 1-18, 81.4) 23- 1 313 H Box Elder ( 9-10, 89.2) 14- 7 320 A American Fork ( 4-15, 85.2) 14- 2 328 A Pleasant Grove ( 4-16, 85.6) 19- 9 408 A Layton ( 2-16, 81.0) 18- 1 410 H Farmington (14- 5, 95.0) 7-13 415 H Fremont (12- 6, 92.7) 6-12 417 A Davis (19- 1, 97.8) 6-17 418 H Hillcrest ( 2-15, 79.7) 17- 5 422 H Syracuse ( 5-15, 85.3) 20- 8 424 H Layton ( 2-16, 81.0) 16- 5 429 A Farmington (14- 5, 95.0) 6-11 501 A Fremont (12- 6, 92.7) 6-16 506 H Davis (19- 1, 97.8) 3-17 508 A Syracuse ( 5-15, 85.3) 19-10 509 A Viewmont ( 6-13, 85.0) 15- 7 515 A Herriman (12- 8, 90.5) 4- 8

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   303 H Green Canyon            4- 3       1     1          -0.41
   306 H Brighton                5-18     -13    -8           0.00
   311 A West Jordan            23- 1      22     8           0.00
   313 H Box Elder              14- 7       7     1    +      3.79
   320 A American Fork          14- 2      12     4           0.84
   328 A Pleasant Grove         19- 9      10     4           1.18
   408 A Layton                 18- 1      17     8           0.00
   410 H Farmington              7-13      -6    -5          -0.41
   415 H Fremont                 6-12      -6    -2    -     -2.69
   417 A Davis                   6-17     -11    -8           0.00
   418 H Hillcrest              17- 5      12    11           0.00
   422 H Syracuse               20- 8      12     5           0.00
   424 H Layton                 16- 5      11     9           0.00
   429 A Farmington              6-11      -5    -6           0.00
   501 A Fremont                 6-16     -10    -3          -1.64
   506 H Davis                   3-17     -14    -7           0.00
   508 A Syracuse               19-10       9     4           0.94
   509 A Viewmont               15- 7       8     4           0.66
   515 A Herriman                4- 8      -4    -1    -     -2.89

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   415 H Fremont                 6-12      -6    -2    -     -2.69
   515 A Herriman                4- 8      -4    -1    -     -2.89

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   313 H Box Elder              14- 7       7     1    +      3.79

Weber Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alta Alta tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Alta
American Fork Weber Weber  
Bear River Bear River insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) Bear River
Bingham Weber tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) Weber
Bonneville Weber Weber   5- 1 vs 1- 5
Bountiful Bountiful tied - ( 4- 0) ( 4- 0) Bountiful
Box Elder Weber Weber  
Brighton Brighton Brighton  
Canyon View Weber   Weber
Cedar Weber insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Weber
Cedar Valley Weber tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Weber
Clearfield Weber Weber   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Copper Hills Weber tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Weber
Corner Canyon Corner Canyon Corner Canyon   5- 0 vs 2- 3
Crimson Cliffs Weber   Weber
Davis Davis Davis  
Desert Hills Weber   Weber
Dixie Weber   Weber
East East tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) East
Farmington Farmington Farmington  
Fremont Fremont Fremont  
Green Canyon Weber Weber  
Herriman Herriman Herriman  
Highland Highland insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 2) Highland
Hillcrest Weber Weber  
Hurricane Weber insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Weber
Jordan Weber insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Weber
Juan Diego Catholic Juan Diego Catholic insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) Juan Diego Catholic
Judge Memorial Catho Judge Memorial Catho insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Judge Memorial Catho
Layton Weber Weber  
Lehi Weber insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) Weber
Logan Weber Weber   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Lone Peak Lone Peak insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) Lone Peak
Maple Mountain Maple Mountain insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Maple Mountain
Mountain Crest Weber tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Weber
Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge tied - ( 3- 3) ( 3- 3) Mountain Ridge
Mountain View Weber tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Weber
Northridge Northridge tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) Northridge
Olympus Olympus insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Olympus
Orem Weber insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Weber
Park City Park City insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) Park City
Payson Payson insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) Payson
Pine View Weber   Weber
Pleasant Grove Weber Weber  
Provo Weber insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Weber
Ridgeline Weber Weber   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Riverton Weber tied - ( 2- 5) ( 2- 5) Weber
Roy Weber Weber   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Salem Hills Weber insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Weber
Sky View Sky View tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Sky View
Skyline Weber tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) Weber
Skyridge Skyridge tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) Skyridge
Snow Canyon Weber   Weber
Spanish Fork Weber insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) Weber
Springville Weber insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Weber
Syracuse Weber Weber  
Timpanogos Weber tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Weber
Timpview Weber tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Weber
Viewmont Weber Weber  
Wasatch Weber tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Weber
Waterford Weber tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Weber
West Weber Weber   3- 1 vs 0- 4
West Field West Field tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) West Field
West Jordan Weber Weber  
Westlake Weber insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 1) Weber
Woods Cross Woods Cross insuffient: ( 4- 2)( 5- 1) Woods Cross

PowerWise = 42


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 18.63

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Green Canyon    (10-10, 89.0)     4- 3      -10.88      18.63      -0.53         0.98            17.75
   0 H Brighton        (18- 3, 98.0)     5-18       -1.91      27.60      -0.53         0.98            -2.38
   0 A West Jordan     ( 1-18, 81.4)    23- 1      -18.48      11.03       0.53         0.98            11.33
   0 H Box Elder       ( 9-10, 89.2)    14- 7      -10.68      18.83      -0.53         0.98            17.95
   0 A American Fork   ( 4-15, 85.2)    14- 2      -14.68      14.83       0.53         0.98            15.06
   0 A Pleasant Grove  ( 4-16, 85.6)    19- 9      -14.34      15.17       0.53         0.98            15.38
   0 A Layton          ( 2-16, 81.0)    18- 1      -18.92      10.59       0.53         0.98            10.90
   0 H Farmington      (14- 5, 95.0)     7-13       -4.88      24.63      -0.53         0.98            -5.30
   0 H Fremont         (12- 6, 92.7)     6-12       -7.16      22.35      -0.53         0.98            -7.54
   0 A Davis           (19- 1, 97.8)     6-17       -2.14      27.37       0.53         0.98            -1.58
   0 H Hillcrest       ( 2-15, 79.7)    17- 5      -20.20       9.31      -0.53         0.98             8.62
   0 H Syracuse        ( 5-15, 85.3)    20- 8      -14.58      14.93      -0.53         0.98            14.12
   0 H Layton          ( 2-16, 81.0)    16- 5      -18.92      10.59      -0.53         0.98             9.87
   0 A Farmington      (14- 5, 95.0)     6-11       -4.88      24.63       0.53         0.98            -4.27
   0 A Fremont         (12- 6, 92.7)     6-16       -7.16      22.35       0.53         0.98            -6.51
   0 H Davis           (19- 1, 97.8)     3-17       -2.14      27.37      -0.53         0.98            -2.61
   0 A Syracuse        ( 5-15, 85.3)    19-10      -14.58      14.93       0.53         0.98            15.15
   0 A Viewmont        ( 6-13, 85.0)    15- 7      -14.86      14.65       0.53         0.98            14.88
   0 A Herriman        (12- 8, 90.5)     4- 8       -9.41      20.10       0.53         0.98            -8.71
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       112.11

winning pts = 151.0104 losing points = -38.9030

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------