Wade Hampton
W-L: ( 3-11) PR = 78.8657Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 225 H TL Hanna ( 7- 8, 84.8) 4- 6 228 H Byrnes ( 7- 8, 89.4) 1-16 304 A Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 1-18 308 A Fox Creek ( 6- 7, 77.7) 11- 7 311 A Riverside ( 5-10, 87.3) 1-16 314 A Spring Valley ( 9- 7, 81.7) 3- 8 325 H Boiling Springs (13- 4, 95.3) 2-21 328 H Eastside ( 9- 8, 90.5) 2-17 402 A Woodmont ( 4- 8, 80.1) 6-17 404 H Blythewood ( 7- 8, 84.0) 5-17 408 H Westside ( 0-16, 73.3) 18- 0 409 H Hillcrest ( 4- 5, 83.3) 2-13 411 H St Joseph Catholic ( 2-10, 76.9) 8- 6 415 A Spartanburg ( 8- 8, 89.7) 2-17
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
225 H TL Hanna 4- 6 -2 -6 + 3.00
228 H Byrnes 1-16 -15 -10 0.00
304 A Dorman 1-18 -17 -15 0.00
308 A Fox Creek 11- 7 4 1 + 3.15
311 A Riverside 1-16 -15 -9 0.00
314 A Spring Valley 3- 8 -5 -3 -1.86
325 H Boiling Springs 2-21 -19 -16 0.00
328 H Eastside 2-17 -15 -11 0.00
402 A Woodmont 6-17 -11 -2 - -3.47
404 H Blythewood 5-17 -12 -5 -0.25
408 H Westside 18- 0 18 6 0.00
409 H Hillcrest 2-13 -11 -4 -0.89
411 H St Joseph Catholic 8- 6 2 2 -0.31
415 A Spartanburg 2-17 -15 -11 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 402 A Woodmont 6-17 -11 -2 - -3.47 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 225 H TL Hanna 4- 6 -2 -6 + 3.00 308 A Fox Creek 11- 7 4 1 + 3.15 |
Wade Hampton Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | AC Flora | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | AC Flora | |
| Academic Magnet Char | Academic Magnet Char | Academic Magnet Char | ||
| Aiken | Aiken | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Aiken | |
| Atlantic Collegiate | Atlantic Collegiate | Atlantic Collegiate | ||
| Beaufort | Beaufort | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Beaufort | |
| Bishop England | Bishop England | Bishop England | ||
| Bluffton | Wade Hampton | Wade Hampton | ||
| Blythewood | Blythewood | Blythewood | ||
| Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Byrnes | Byrnes | Byrnes | ||
| Camden Military Acad | Wade Hampton | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Wade Hampton | |
| Carolina Forest | Carolina Forest | Carolina Forest | ||
| Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Chapin | Chapin | Chapin 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Christ Church Episco | Christ Church Episco | Christ Church Episco 5- 1 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Clover | Clover | Clover 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Dorman | Dorman | Dorman | ||
| Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Eastside | Eastside | Eastside | ||
| Fort Mill | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Fox Creek | Wade Hampton | Wade Hampton | ||
| Gilbert | Wade Hampton | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Wade Hampton | |
| Greenville | Greenville | Greenville 6- 1 vs 0- 7 | ||
| Hammond School | Hammond School | Hammond School | ||
| Heathwood Hall | Heathwood Hall | Heathwood Hall | ||
| Hillcrest | Hillcrest | Hillcrest | ||
| Hilton Head | Hilton Head | Hilton Head | ||
| Hilton Head Christia | Wade Hampton | Wade Hampton | ||
| James Island Charter | James Island Charter | James Island Charter | ||
| JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 5- 2 vs 0- 7 | ||
| Laurence Manning Aca | Laurence Manning Aca | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Laurence Manning Aca | |
| Legion Collegiate Ac | Legion Collegiate Ac | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Legion Collegiate Ac | |
| Lexington | Lexington | Lexington 3- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Lucy Beckham | |
| Mauldin | Mauldin | Mauldin 5- 2 vs 0- 7 | ||
| May River | May River | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | May River | |
| Myrtle Beach | Myrtle Beach | Myrtle Beach | ||
| Nation Ford | Nation Ford | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Nation Ford | |
| North Myrtle Beach | North Myrtle Beach | North Myrtle Beach | ||
| Oceanside Academy | Oceanside Academy | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Oceanside Academy | |
| Philip Simmons | Philip Simmons | Philip Simmons | ||
| Porter-Gaud | Porter-Gaud | Porter-Gaud | ||
| River Bluff | River Bluff | River Bluff 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Riverside | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Socastee | Socastee | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Socastee | |
| Spartanburg | Spartanburg | Spartanburg | ||
| Spring Valley | Spring Valley | Spring Valley | ||
| St James | St James | St James | ||
| St Joseph Catholic | Wade Hampton | Wade Hampton | ||
| TL Hanna | TL Hanna | TL Hanna | ||
| Trinity Collegiate | Wade Hampton | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Wade Hampton | |
| Waccamaw | Waccamaw | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Waccamaw | |
| Wando | Wando | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Wando | |
| Westside | Wade Hampton | Wade Hampton | ||
| White Knoll | White Knoll | White Knoll 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Woodmont | Woodmont | Woodmont |
PowerWise = 8
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.54
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H TL Hanna ( 7- 8, 84.8) 4- 6 -15.09 11.51 -0.33 0.97 -14.92
0 H Byrnes ( 7- 8, 89.4) 1-16 -10.48 16.12 -0.33 0.97 -10.46
0 A Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 1-18 -6.64 19.97 0.33 0.97 -6.10
0 A Fox Creek ( 6- 7, 77.7) 11- 7 -22.22 4.38 0.33 0.97 4.56
0 A Riverside ( 5-10, 87.3) 1-16 -12.58 14.03 0.33 0.97 -11.84
0 A Spring Valley ( 9- 7, 81.7) 3- 8 -18.23 8.38 0.33 0.97 -17.31
0 H Boiling Spring (13- 4, 95.3) 2-21 -4.56 22.04 -0.33 0.97 -4.73
0 H Eastside ( 9- 8, 90.5) 2-17 -9.37 17.24 -0.33 0.97 -9.38
0 A Woodmont ( 4- 8, 80.1) 6-17 -19.84 6.76 0.33 0.97 -18.87
0 H Blythewood ( 7- 8, 84.0) 5-17 -15.95 10.66 -0.33 0.97 -15.75
0 H Westside ( 0-16, 73.3) 18- 0 -26.60 1.00 -0.33 0.97 0.64
0 H Hillcrest ( 4- 5, 83.3) 2-13 -16.59 10.01 -0.33 0.97 -16.38
0 H St Joseph Cath ( 2-10, 76.9) 8- 6 -23.01 3.59 -0.33 0.97 3.15
0 A Spartanburg ( 8- 8, 89.7) 2-17 -10.20 16.40 0.33 0.97 -9.54
------
-126.94
|
winning pts = 8.3600 losing points = -135.2973
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------