---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:50 PDT

safe3step boys Valley Regional 1
  
Valley Regional       
W-L: (10- 9) PR = 79.3486

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 408 A Cromwell ( 1-15, 63.5) 18- 2 410 H Norwich Tech ( 5-11, 66.9) 16- 3 415 H Old Lyme ( 4-12, 74.7) 19- 7 417 A North Branford (11- 8, 81.5) 4- 7 422 H Haddam-Killingworth (19- 2, 86.2) 9-17 424 H Old Saybrook (15- 5, 83.4) 12-13 426 H Ellington ( 6-10, 78.2) 8- 6 501 A Old Lyme ( 4-12, 74.7) 6- 7 505 H Morgan School ( 8-10, 78.1) 8-10 508 A Haddam-Killingworth (19- 2, 86.2) 7-19 512 H Notre Dame-Fairfield ( 1-15, 67.9) 11- 2 513 H Cromwell ( 1-15, 63.5) 23- 0 515 A Old Saybrook (15- 5, 83.4) 16-15 519 H North Branford (11- 8, 81.5) 4- 9 521 H Montville ( 2-14, 69.6) 19- 7 523 A Morgan School ( 8-10, 78.1) 18-11 527 A Haddam-Killingworth (19- 2, 86.2) 3-17 530 H Rocky Hill ( 7-11, 71.1) 15- 2 604 A Sheehan (15- 5, 84.5) 5-20

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   408 A Cromwell               18- 2      16    15           0.00
   410 H Norwich Tech           16- 3      13    13           0.00
   415 H Old Lyme               19- 7      12     5           0.00
   417 A North Branford          4- 7      -3    -3          -0.42
   422 H Haddam-Killingworth     9-17      -8    -6           0.00
   424 H Old Saybrook           12-13      -1    -4    +      2.53
   426 H Ellington               8- 6       2     2           0.34
   501 A Old Lyme                6- 7      -1     4    --    -5.16
   505 H Morgan School           8-10      -2     2    -     -3.69
   508 A Haddam-Killingworth     7-19     -12    -7           0.00
   512 H Notre Dame-Fairfield   11- 2       9    12           0.00
   513 H Cromwell               23- 0      23    16           0.00
   515 A Old Saybrook           16-15       1    -4    ++     5.48
   519 H North Branford          4- 9      -5    -2    -     -3.36
   521 H Montville              19- 7      12    10           0.00
   523 A Morgan School          18-11       7     1    ++     4.25
   527 A Haddam-Killingworth     3-17     -14    -7           0.00
   530 H Rocky Hill             15- 2      13     9           0.00
   604 A Sheehan                 5-20     -15    -6           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   501 A Old Lyme                6- 7      -1     4    --    -5.16
   505 H Morgan School           8-10      -2     2    -     -3.69
   519 H North Branford          4- 9      -5    -2    -     -3.36

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   515 A Old Saybrook           16-15       1    -4    ++     5.48
   523 A Morgan School          18-11       7     1    ++     4.25
   424 H Old Saybrook           12-13      -1    -4    +      2.53

Valley Regional Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Amity Regional Amity Regional insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Amity Regional
Avon HS Avon HS tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Avon HS
Bacon Academy Bacon Academy tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 1) Bacon Academy
Berlin Valley Regional insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Valley Regional
Bethel Bethel tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bethel
Branford Valley Regional Valley Regional   2- 4 vs 0- 4
Brien McMahon Brien McMahon   Brien McMahon
Bristol Co-Op Bristol Co-Op tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bristol Co-Op
Brookfield Brookfield tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Brookfield
Bunnell-Stratford Valley Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Valley Regional
Canton Canton insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) Canton
Capital-Classical Pr Valley Regional   Valley Regional
Cheshire HS Cheshire HS insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Cheshire HS
Conard Conard   Conard
Cromwell Valley Regional Valley Regional  
Danbury Valley Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Valley Regional
Daniel Hand Daniel Hand   Daniel Hand
Darien Darien   Darien
East Catholic East Catholic   East Catholic
East Lyme East Lyme tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) East Lyme
Ellington Valley Regional Valley Regional  
Enfield Valley Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Valley Regional
EO Smith Valley Regional tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Valley Regional
Fairfield Ludlowe Fairfield Ludlowe   Fairfield Ludlowe
Fairfield Prep Fairfield Prep insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Fairfield Prep
Fairfield Warde Fairfield Warde tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Fairfield Warde
Farmington Farmington   Farmington
Fitch Groton Valley Regional insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 1) Valley Regional
Foran Foran insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Foran
Glastonbury Glastonbury   Glastonbury
Granby Memorial Granby Memorial tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Granby Memorial
Greenwich HS Greenwich HS   Greenwich HS
Guilford Guilford   Guilford
Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth Haddam-Killingworth  
Hall Hall tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) Hall
Hamden Hamden tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Hamden
Holy Cross Valley Regional   Valley Regional
Immaculate Danbury Valley Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Valley Regional
Joel Barlow Joel Barlow tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Joel Barlow
Jonathan Law Valley Regional insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 2) Valley Regional
Lakeview United Valley Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Valley Regional
Ledyard-Griswold Valley Regional insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 1) Valley Regional
Lewis Mills Lewis Mills tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Lewis Mills
Lyman Hall Valley Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Valley Regional
Maloney-Platt Valley Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Valley Regional
Masuk Masuk tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Masuk
Middletown Valley Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Valley Regional
Montville Valley Regional Valley Regional  
Morgan School Valley Regional insuffient: ( 3- 4)( 2- 3) Valley Regional
New Canaan New Canaan   New Canaan
New Fairfield New Fairfield tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 0) New Fairfield
New Milford New Milford tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) New Milford
Newington Newington tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Newington
Newtown Newtown tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Newtown
North Branford North Branford North Branford  
North Haven Valley Regional tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) Valley Regional
Northwest Catholic Northwest Catholic   Northwest Catholic
Norwalk Valley Regional   Valley Regional
Norwich Free Academy Valley Regional tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Valley Regional
Norwich Tech Valley Regional Valley Regional  
Notre Dame-Fairfield Valley Regional Valley Regional  
Notre Dame-West Have Notre Dame-West Have insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Notre Dame-West Have
Old Lyme Valley Regional Valley Regional   4- 4 vs 2- 4
Old Saybrook Old Saybrook Old Saybrook   5- 0 vs 3- 4
Pomperaug Pomperaug tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Pomperaug
Prince-Cheney Tech Valley Regional Valley Regional   2- 0 vs 0- 2
RHAM RHAM   RHAM
Ridgefield Ridgefield   Ridgefield
Rockville Co-op Valley Regional Valley Regional   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Rocky Hill Valley Regional Valley Regional  
Sheehan Sheehan Sheehan  
Shelton Valley Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Valley Regional
Simsbury Simsbury   Simsbury
Somers Somers tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 0) Somers
South Windsor South Windsor tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) South Windsor
Southington Southington   Southington
St Bernard-Wheeler St Bernard-Wheeler tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) St Bernard-Wheeler
St Joseph Trumbull St Joseph Trumbull   St Joseph Trumbull
St Paul Catholic Valley Regional   Valley Regional
Stamford Stamford   Stamford
Staples Staples   Staples
Stonington Valley Regional insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 2) Valley Regional
Suffield Suffield tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Suffield
Tolland Valley Regional insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Valley Regional
Trumbull Trumbull   Trumbull
Vinal/Goodwin Tech Valley Regional Valley Regional   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Waterford Waterford tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) Waterford
Watertown Valley Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Valley Regional
West Haven Valley Regional tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Valley Regional
Westhill Valley Regional   Valley Regional
Weston Weston tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Weston
Wethersfield Wethersfield   Wethersfield
Wilbur Cross Valley Regional tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Valley Regional
Wilton Wilton   Wilton
Windsor Valley Regional insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Valley Regional
Wolcott Valley Regional tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Valley Regional
Woodstock Academy Valley Regional tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Valley Regional
Xavier Xavier   Xavier

PowerWise = 41


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 17.01

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Cromwell        ( 1-15, 63.5)    18- 2      -36.37       3.88       0.47         0.90             3.90
   0 H Norwich Tech    ( 5-11, 66.9)    16- 3      -33.02       7.24      -0.47         0.90             6.06
   0 H Old Lyme        ( 4-12, 74.7)    19- 7      -25.18      15.07      -0.47         0.90            13.07
   0 A North Branford  (11- 8, 81.5)     4- 7      -18.44      21.81       0.47         0.90           -16.09
   0 H Haddam-Killing  (19- 2, 86.2)     9-17      -13.74      26.52      -0.47         0.90           -12.72
   0 H Old Saybrook    (15- 5, 83.4)    12-13      -16.54      23.71      -0.47         0.90           -15.24
   0 H Ellington       ( 6-10, 78.2)     8- 6      -21.73      18.52      -0.47         0.90            16.16
   0 A Old Lyme        ( 4-12, 74.7)     6- 7      -25.18      15.07       0.47         0.90           -22.12
   0 H Morgan School   ( 8-10, 78.1)     8-10      -21.77      18.48      -0.47         0.90           -19.92
   0 A Haddam-Killing  (19- 2, 86.2)     7-19      -13.74      26.52       0.47         0.90           -11.88
   0 H Notre Dame-Fai  ( 1-15, 67.9)    11- 2      -31.96       8.29      -0.47         0.90             7.00
   0 H Cromwell        ( 1-15, 63.5)    23- 0      -36.37       3.88      -0.47         0.90             3.05
   0 A Old Saybrook    (15- 5, 83.4)    16-15      -16.54      23.71       0.47         0.90            21.65
   0 H North Branford  (11- 8, 81.5)     4- 9      -18.44      21.81      -0.47         0.90           -16.93
   0 H Montville       ( 2-14, 69.6)    19- 7      -30.27       9.99      -0.47         0.90             8.52
   0 A Morgan School   ( 8-10, 78.1)    18-11      -21.77      18.48       0.47         0.90            16.97
   0 A Haddam-Killing  (19- 2, 86.2)     3-17      -13.74      26.52       0.47         0.90           -11.88
   0 H Rocky Hill      ( 7-11, 71.1)    15- 2      -28.82      11.43      -0.47         0.90             9.81
   0 A Sheehan         (15- 5, 84.5)     5-20      -15.41      24.84       0.47         0.90           -13.37
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -33.96

winning pts = 106.1868 losing points = -140.1444

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------