University School Mo
W-L: (11- 3) PR = 94.9975Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 319 A Buckhannon-Upshur ( 8- 4, 91.8) 3- 9 321 A Linsly School ( 8- 4, 94.6) 9- 3 325 H Wheeling Central Cat ( 4- 6, 89.7) 14- 3 327 H Hedgesville ( 3- 5, 86.0) 13- 2 329 H Martinsburg ( 4- 4, 92.4) 11- 3 402 H John Marshall ( 1- 8, 86.5) 16- 0 405 H Spring Mills ( 3- 4, 91.4) 15- 2 408 A Wheeling Park ( 1- 8, 88.2) 13- 3 411 A George Washington ( 7- 4, 95.0) 6- 4 423 A Fairmont (10- 4, 95.0) 8- 7 425 H Musselman ( 1- 7, 81.1) 18- 1 429 A Preston ( 0- 9, 77.7) 18- 0 502 H Morgantown (13- 0, 99.9) 7-14 508 H Fairmont (10- 4, 95.0) 9-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
319 A Buckhannon-Upshur 3- 9 -6 2 --- -6.75
321 A Linsly School 9- 3 6 -1 +++ 6.03
325 H Wheeling Central Cat 14- 3 11 7 0.00
327 H Hedgesville 13- 2 11 10 0.00
329 H Martinsburg 11- 3 8 4 0.90
402 H John Marshall 16- 0 16 10 0.00
405 H Spring Mills 15- 2 13 5 0.00
408 A Wheeling Park 13- 3 10 5 0.00
411 A George Washington 6- 4 2 -1 + 3.45
423 A Fairmont 8- 7 1 -1 + 2.42
425 H Musselman 18- 1 17 15 0.00
429 A Preston 18- 0 18 16 0.00
502 H Morgantown 7-14 -7 -3 -1.55
508 H Fairmont 9-12 -3 1 -- -4.48
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 319 A Buckhannon-Upshur 3- 9 -6 2 --- -6.75 508 H Fairmont 9-12 -3 1 -- -4.48 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 321 A Linsly School 9- 3 6 -1 +++ 6.03 411 A George Washington 6- 4 2 -1 + 3.45 423 A Fairmont 8- 7 1 -1 + 2.42 |
University School Mo Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buckhannon-Upshur | Buckhannon-Upshur | Buckhannon-Upshur | ||
| Fairmont | University School Mo | tied - ( 8- 2) ( 8- 2) | University School Mo | |
| George Washington | University School Mo | University School Mo | ||
| Harrison County LC | University School Mo | University School Mo | ||
| Hedgesville | University School Mo | University School Mo | ||
| Jefferson County | University School Mo | University School Mo 5- 1 vs 3- 3 | ||
| John Marshall | University School Mo | University School Mo | ||
| Linsly School | University School Mo | University School Mo | ||
| Martinsburg | University School Mo | University School Mo | ||
| Morgantown | Morgantown | Morgantown | ||
| Mountain State | University School Mo | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) | University School Mo | |
| Musselman | University School Mo | University School Mo | ||
| Preston | University School Mo | University School Mo | ||
| Spring Mills | University School Mo | University School Mo | ||
| St Albans | University School Mo | University School Mo 6- 2 vs 0- 7 | ||
| Wheeling Central Cat | University School Mo | University School Mo | ||
| Wheeling Park | University School Mo | University School Mo |
PowerWise = 15
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 9.56
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Buckhannon-Ups ( 8- 4, 91.8) 3- 9 -8.11 14.05 1.45 0.68 -4.54
0 A Linsly School ( 8- 4, 94.6) 9- 3 -5.33 16.84 1.45 0.68 12.48
0 H Wheeling Centr ( 4- 6, 89.7) 14- 3 -10.16 12.00 -1.45 0.68 7.20
0 H Hedgesville ( 3- 5, 86.0) 13- 2 -13.87 8.29 -1.45 0.68 4.67
0 H Martinsburg ( 4- 4, 92.4) 11- 3 -7.55 14.62 -1.45 0.68 8.99
0 H John Marshall ( 1- 8, 86.5) 16- 0 -13.44 8.72 -1.45 0.68 4.96
0 H Spring Mills ( 3- 4, 91.4) 15- 2 -8.54 13.62 -1.45 0.68 8.31
0 A Wheeling Park ( 1- 8, 88.2) 13- 3 -11.66 10.50 1.45 0.68 8.16
0 A George Washing ( 7- 4, 95.0) 6- 4 -4.90 17.26 1.45 0.68 12.77
0 A Fairmont (10- 4, 95.0) 8- 7 -4.94 17.23 1.45 0.68 12.75
0 H Musselman ( 1- 7, 81.1) 18- 1 -18.76 3.40 -1.45 0.68 1.33
0 A Preston ( 0- 9, 77.7) 18- 0 -22.16 1.00 1.45 0.68 1.67
0 H Morgantown (13- 0, 99.9) 7-14 -0.00 22.16 -1.45 0.68 -0.99
0 H Fairmont (10- 4, 95.0) 9-12 -4.94 17.23 -1.45 0.68 -4.36
------
73.39
|
winning pts = 83.2821 losing points = -9.8936
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------