Truckee/North Tahoe
W-L: ( 9- 4) PR = 96.4713Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 305 A Spanish Springs (10- 4, 94.4) 11-12 402 A Galena ( 6- 8, 91.1) 9- 4 404 A Bishop Manogue (15- 2, 99.5) 4-15 407 A Douglas ( 8- 6, 87.6) 16- 1 409 H Spanish Springs (10- 4, 94.4) 10- 6 422 H Bishop Manogue (15- 2, 99.5) 6- 8 424 H Reno ( 5- 8, 85.6) 22- 2 429 H Galena ( 6- 8, 91.1) 12- 7 430 A Reed ( 1-11, 81.3) 19- 1 502 H Damonte Ranch ( 0-11, 76.0) 22- 0 506 A McQueen ( 7- 7, 87.9) 21- 4 509 H Spanish Springs (10- 4, 94.4) 17-10 514 A Bishop Manogue (15- 2, 99.5) 9-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
305 A Spanish Springs 11-12 -1 1 - -2.45
402 A Galena 9- 4 5 5 0.30
404 A Bishop Manogue 4-15 -11 -4 -1.35
407 A Douglas 16- 1 15 8 0.00
409 H Spanish Springs 10- 6 4 3 1.26
422 H Bishop Manogue 6- 8 -2 -2 0.36
424 H Reno 22- 2 20 12 0.00
429 H Galena 12- 7 5 6 0.00
430 A Reed 19- 1 18 14 0.00
502 H Damonte Ranch 22- 0 22 21 0.00
506 A McQueen 21- 4 17 8 0.00
509 H Spanish Springs 17-10 7 3 + 2.26
514 A Bishop Manogue 9-12 -3 -4 0.65
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 305 A Spanish Springs 11-12 -1 1 - -2.45 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 509 H Spanish Springs 17-10 7 3 + 2.26 |
Truckee/North Tahoe Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bishop Gorman | |
| Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Centennial | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Clark County | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Coronado | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Damonte Ranch | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Douglas | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Faith Lutheran | Faith Lutheran | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Faith Lutheran | |
| Foothill Hendersonvi | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Galena | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| McQueen | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Palo Verde | Palo Verde | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Palo Verde | |
| Reed | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Reno | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Spanish Springs | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe |
PowerWise = 11
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 11.38
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Spanish Spring (10- 4, 94.4) 11-12 -5.53 18.37 0.64 0.88 -4.27
0 A Galena ( 6- 8, 91.1) 9- 4 -8.77 15.12 0.64 0.88 13.79
0 A Bishop Manogue (15- 2, 99.5) 4-15 -0.43 23.47 0.64 0.88 -0.19
0 A Douglas ( 8- 6, 87.6) 16- 1 -12.30 11.59 0.64 0.88 10.71
0 H Spanish Spring (10- 4, 94.4) 10- 6 -5.53 18.37 -0.64 0.88 15.51
0 H Bishop Manogue (15- 2, 99.5) 6- 8 -0.43 23.47 -0.64 0.88 -0.94
0 H Reno ( 5- 8, 85.6) 22- 2 -14.33 9.57 -0.64 0.88 7.81
0 H Galena ( 6- 8, 91.1) 12- 7 -8.77 15.12 -0.64 0.88 12.67
0 A Reed ( 1-11, 81.3) 19- 1 -18.56 5.33 0.64 0.88 5.23
0 H Damonte Ranch ( 0-11, 76.0) 22- 0 -23.89 1.00 -0.64 0.88 0.31
0 A McQueen ( 7- 7, 87.9) 21- 4 -11.99 11.90 0.64 0.88 10.98
0 H Spanish Spring (10- 4, 94.4) 17-10 -5.53 18.37 -0.64 0.88 15.51
0 A Bishop Manogue (15- 2, 99.5) 9-12 -0.43 23.47 0.64 0.88 -0.19
------
86.92
|
winning pts = 92.5087 losing points = -5.5889
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------