St Thomas Aquinas
W-L: (13- 6) PR = 90.4255Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 415 H Londonderry (10- 8, 90.5) 12- 9 416 H Goffstown ( 9- 7, 88.2) 11-12 421 H Portsmouth (16- 4, 92.5) 8-12 423 A Timberlane (12- 5, 89.3) 9-10 425 H Merrimack Valley ( 6-10, 86.1) 19- 5 428 A Alvirne ( 1-15, 79.3) 22- 3 501 A Windham ( 6-10, 87.1) 11- 7 502 H Concord ( 8-10, 88.3) 10- 9 505 A Pembroke Academy ( 2-13, 81.9) 21- 4 507 H Hollis-Brookline (13- 6, 89.9) 12-13 512 A Winnacunnet (13- 4, 90.7) 10- 9 514 H Souhegan ( 4-13, 83.6) 17- 2 516 A Hanover ( 6-10, 86.1) 13- 3 520 A Kingswood ( 4-10, 84.3) 15- 3 521 H Derryfield (18- 1, 93.0) 10-11 523 A Spaulding ( 0-16, 74.7) 19- 3 527 H Oyster River-Newmark ( 9- 8, 87.7) 12- 7 607 A Hollis-Brookline (13- 6, 89.9) 9- 8 612 N Derryfield (18- 1, 93.0) 5- 7
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
415 H Londonderry 12- 9 3 0 + 2.73
416 H Goffstown 11-12 -1 3 - -3.65
421 H Portsmouth 8-12 -4 -2 - -2.27
423 A Timberlane 9-10 -1 1 -1.73
425 H Merrimack Valley 19- 5 14 5 0.28
428 A Alvirne 22- 3 19 11 0.00
501 A Windham 11- 7 4 3 1.05
502 H Concord 10- 9 1 2 -1.46
505 A Pembroke Academy 21- 4 17 8 0.00
507 H Hollis-Brookline 12-13 -1 1 -1.94
512 A Winnacunnet 10- 9 1 -1 1.63
514 H Souhegan 17- 2 15 7 0.00
516 A Hanover 13- 3 10 4 1.07
520 A Kingswood 15- 3 12 6 0.00
521 H Derryfield 10-11 -1 -2 1.16
523 A Spaulding 19- 3 16 15 0.00
527 H Oyster River-Newmark 12- 7 5 3 1.88
607 A Hollis-Brookline 9- 8 1 0 0.82
612 N Derryfield 5- 7 -2 -3 0.53
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 416 H Goffstown 11-12 -1 3 - -3.65 421 H Portsmouth 8-12 -4 -2 - -2.27 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 415 H Londonderry 12- 9 3 0 + 2.73 |
St Thomas Aquinas Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Bedford | Bedford | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Bedford | |
| Bishop Brady | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Bishop Guertin | |
| Bow | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Campbell | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Coe-Brown | |
| Concord | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| ConVal | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Derryfield | Derryfield | Derryfield | ||
| Dover | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 6- 1 vs 3- 4 | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) | Exeter HS | |
| Gilford | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Goffstown | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Hanover | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | St Thomas Aquinas | insuffient: (11- 4)(10- 5) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Hopkinton | Hopkinton | Hopkinton | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| John Stark | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Kearsarge | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Kennett | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Kingswood | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Laconia | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Lebanon | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Londonderry | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Manchester Memorial- | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Merrimack | Merrimack | tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) | Merrimack | |
| Merrimack Valley | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Milford | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Nashua North | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 4- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Nashua South | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 5- 2 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Oyster River-Newmark | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Pelham | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Pembroke Academy | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Plymouth Regional | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Souhegan | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Spaulding | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Stevens | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Timberlane | Timberlane | Timberlane | ||
| Trinity Manchester | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Windham | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Winnacunnet | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas |
PowerWise = 35
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 16.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Londonderry (10- 8, 90.5) 12- 9 -9.36 17.23 -0.38 0.86 14.46
0 H Goffstown ( 9- 7, 88.2) 11-12 -11.75 14.85 -0.38 0.86 -10.40
0 H Portsmouth (16- 4, 92.5) 8-12 -7.37 19.22 -0.38 0.86 -6.65
0 A Timberlane (12- 5, 89.3) 9-10 -10.58 16.01 0.38 0.86 -8.76
0 H Merrimack Vall ( 6-10, 86.1) 19- 5 -13.82 12.78 -0.38 0.86 10.64
0 A Alvirne ( 1-15, 79.3) 22- 3 -20.56 6.04 0.38 0.86 5.50
0 A Windham ( 6-10, 87.1) 11- 7 -12.80 13.79 0.38 0.86 12.15
0 H Concord ( 8-10, 88.3) 10- 9 -11.56 15.04 -0.38 0.86 12.58
0 A Pembroke Acade ( 2-13, 81.9) 21- 4 -18.01 8.59 0.38 0.86 7.69
0 H Hollis-Brookli (13- 6, 89.9) 12-13 -10.03 16.56 -0.38 0.86 -8.93
0 A Winnacunnet (13- 4, 90.7) 10- 9 -9.22 17.37 0.38 0.86 15.23
0 H Souhegan ( 4-13, 83.6) 17- 2 -16.33 10.27 -0.38 0.86 8.48
0 A Hanover ( 6-10, 86.1) 13- 3 -13.78 12.82 0.38 0.86 11.32
0 A Kingswood ( 4-10, 84.3) 15- 3 -15.60 11.00 0.38 0.86 9.76
0 H Derryfield (18- 1, 93.0) 10-11 -6.94 19.66 -0.38 0.86 -6.28
0 A Spaulding ( 0-16, 74.7) 19- 3 -25.23 1.37 0.38 0.86 1.50
0 H Oyster River-N ( 9- 8, 87.7) 12- 7 -12.21 14.38 -0.38 0.86 12.01
0 A Hollis-Brookli (13- 6, 89.9) 9- 8 -10.03 16.56 0.38 0.86 14.53
0 N Derryfield (18- 1, 93.0) 5- 7 -6.94 19.66 -0.00 0.86 -5.95
------
88.88
|
winning pts = 135.8482 losing points = -46.9644
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------