---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 17:13 PDT

safe3step boys Spring Mills 1
  
Spring Mills          
W-L: ( 3- 4) PR = 91.3619

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 324 H Musselman ( 1- 7, 81.1) 15- 5 328 H Morgantown (13- 0, 99.9) 6-10 402 A Hedgesville ( 3- 5, 86.0) 9- 6 405 A University School Mo (11- 3, 95.0) 2-15 409 H Jefferson County ( 5- 4, 89.1) 7- 2 426 A Fairmont (10- 4, 95.0) 2-13 428 H Martinsburg ( 4- 4, 92.4) 6- 9

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   324 H Musselman              15- 5      10    12           0.00
   328 H Morgantown              6-10      -4    -7           1.00
   402 A Hedgesville             9- 6       3     4          -0.88
   405 A University School Mo    2-15     -13    -5           0.00
   409 H Jefferson County        7- 2       5     4           1.25
   426 A Fairmont                2-13     -11    -5           0.00
   428 H Martinsburg             6- 9      -3     0    -     -3.46

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   428 H Martinsburg             6- 9      -3     0    -     -3.46

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Spring Mills Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Buckhannon-Upshur Buckhannon-Upshur insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Buckhannon-Upshur
Fairmont Fairmont Fairmont  
George Washington George Washington tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) George Washington
Harrison County LC Spring Mills   Spring Mills
Hedgesville Spring Mills Spring Mills  
Jefferson County Spring Mills Spring Mills  
John Marshall Spring Mills tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) Spring Mills
Linsly School Linsly School insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) Linsly School
Martinsburg Martinsburg Martinsburg  
Morgantown Morgantown Morgantown  
Mountain State Mountain State tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Mountain State
Musselman Spring Mills Spring Mills  
Preston Spring Mills Spring Mills   3- 3 vs 0- 6
St Albans Spring Mills tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Spring Mills
University School Mo University School Mo University School Mo  
Wheeling Central Cat Spring Mills tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) Spring Mills
Wheeling Park Spring Mills tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) Spring Mills

PowerWise = 9


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 9.56

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Musselman       ( 1- 7, 81.1)    15- 5      -18.76       3.40      -1.45         1.37             2.66
   0 H Morgantown      (13- 0, 99.9)     6-10       -0.00      22.16      -1.45         1.37            -1.98
   0 A Hedgesville     ( 3- 5, 86.0)     9- 6      -13.87       8.29       1.45         1.37            13.30
   0 A University Sch  (11- 3, 95.0)     2-15       -4.90      17.26       1.45         1.37            -4.71
   0 H Jefferson Coun  ( 5- 4, 89.1)     7- 2      -10.84      11.33      -1.45         1.37            13.48
   0 A Fairmont        (10- 4, 95.0)     2-13       -4.94      17.23       1.45         1.37            -4.75
   0 H Martinsburg     ( 4- 4, 92.4)     6- 9       -7.55      14.62      -1.45         1.37           -12.28
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                         5.71

winning pts = 29.4377 losing points = -23.7289

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------