Scarborough
W-L: ( 8- 8) PR = 91.7231Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 417 A Windham (10- 5, 93.1) 4- 9 419 H Marshwood ( 3-11, 87.7) 4- 6 423 H Cape Elizabeth ( 9- 6, 95.3) 5- 3 425 A Falmouth (14- 1, 99.9) 1-15 502 H South Portland (12- 4, 95.1) 5-12 507 H Thornton Academy (11- 4, 96.3) 2- 8 513 H Portland (11- 5, 90.4) 15- 3 516 A Yarmouth (12- 3, 97.0) 1-10 519 H Oak Hill (10- 6, 88.6) 14- 7 520 A Gorham ( 6- 8, 89.3) 9- 7 522 A Brunswick (10- 6, 91.7) 6- 8 527 A Cheverus ( 7- 7, 87.2) 15- 7 530 H Massabesic ( 4- 9, 85.8) 19- 3 602 A Deering ( 8- 8, 91.9) 8- 5 610 N Edward Little ( 8- 7, 84.2) 19- 2 613 A Thornton Academy (11- 4, 96.3) 3-10
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
417 A Windham 4- 9 -5 -2 - -2.87
419 H Marshwood 4- 6 -2 5 --- -6.75
423 H Cape Elizabeth 5- 3 2 -3 ++ 4.88
425 A Falmouth 1-15 -14 -9 0.00
502 H South Portland 5-12 -7 -3 - -2.37
507 H Thornton Academy 2- 8 -6 -4 -1.16
513 H Portland 15- 3 12 2 + 2.93
516 A Yarmouth 1-10 -9 -6 0.00
519 H Oak Hill 14- 7 7 4 1.12
520 A Gorham 9- 7 2 2 0.34
522 A Brunswick 6- 8 -2 -1 -1.26
527 A Cheverus 15- 7 8 4 1.19
530 H Massabesic 19- 3 16 7 0.00
602 A Deering 8- 5 3 -1 + 3.96
610 N Edward Little 19- 2 17 7 0.00
613 A Thornton Academy 3-10 -7 -5 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 419 H Marshwood 4- 6 -2 5 --- -6.75 417 A Windham 4- 9 -5 -2 - -2.87 502 H South Portland 5-12 -7 -3 - -2.37 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 423 H Cape Elizabeth 5- 3 2 -3 ++ 4.88 513 H Portland 15- 3 12 2 + 2.93 602 A Deering 8- 5 3 -1 + 3.96 |
Scarborough Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangor | Scarborough | Scarborough 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Biddeford | Scarborough | Scarborough 4- 2 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Bonny Eagle | Scarborough | tied - ( 2- 4) ( 2- 4) | Scarborough | |
| Brewer | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Brunswick | Brunswick | Brunswick | ||
| Camden Hills Regiona | Scarborough | Scarborough 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Cape Elizabeth | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Cheverus | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Cony | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Scarborough | |
| Deering | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Edward Little | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Erskine Academy | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Scarborough | |
| Falmouth | Falmouth | Falmouth | ||
| Freeport | Freeport | Freeport 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Fryeburg Academy | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Scarborough | |
| Gardiner Area | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Scarborough | |
| Gorham | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Gray/New Gloucester/ | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 3) | Scarborough | |
| Greely | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Scarborough | |
| Hampden Academy | Scarborough | Scarborough 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Houlton/Hogdon | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| John Bapst Memorial | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Kennebunk | Kennebunk | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) | Kennebunk | |
| Lake Region | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Lawrence/Winslow | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Lewiston | Scarborough | Scarborough 3- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Lincoln Academy | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Scarborough | |
| Maranacook-Winthrop | Scarborough | Scarborough 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Marshwood | Marshwood | Marshwood | ||
| Massabesic | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| MCI-Nokomis | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Scarborough | |
| Messalonskee | Messalonskee | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 3) | Messalonskee | |
| Morse/Boothbay | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Scarborough | |
| Mount Ararat | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Scarborough | |
| Mount Blue | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Scarborough | |
| Noble/Sanford | Scarborough | Scarborough 4- 3 vs 2- 5 | ||
| North Yarmouth Acade | Scarborough | tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) | Scarborough | |
| Oak Hill | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Oxford Hills | Scarborough | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Scarborough | |
| Portland | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| South Portland | South Portland | South Portland | ||
| Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Traip Academy | Scarborough | Scarborough 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Waynflete School | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| Wells | Scarborough | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Scarborough | |
| Westbrook | Scarborough | Scarborough 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Windham | Windham | Windham | ||
| Yarmouth | Yarmouth | Yarmouth | ||
| York | York | York 5- 2 vs 2- 5 |
PowerWise = 38
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.00
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Windham (10- 5, 93.1) 4- 9 -6.79 21.65 0.74 0.81 -4.92
0 H Marshwood ( 3-11, 87.7) 4- 6 -12.19 16.26 -0.74 0.81 -10.50
0 H Cape Elizabeth ( 9- 6, 95.3) 5- 3 -4.55 23.89 -0.74 0.81 18.81
0 A Falmouth (14- 1, 99.9) 1-15 -0.00 28.44 0.74 0.81 -0.60
0 H South Portland (12- 4, 95.1) 5-12 -4.81 23.63 -0.74 0.81 -4.51
0 H Thornton Acade (11- 4, 96.3) 2- 8 -3.60 24.84 -0.74 0.81 -3.52
0 H Portland (11- 5, 90.4) 15- 3 -9.50 18.94 -0.74 0.81 14.79
0 A Yarmouth (12- 3, 97.0) 1-10 -2.88 25.56 0.74 0.81 -1.74
0 H Oak Hill (10- 6, 88.6) 14- 7 -11.32 17.12 -0.74 0.81 13.31
0 A Gorham ( 6- 8, 89.3) 9- 7 -10.58 17.86 0.74 0.81 15.11
0 A Brunswick (10- 6, 91.7) 6- 8 -8.18 20.26 0.74 0.81 -6.05
0 A Cheverus ( 7- 7, 87.2) 15- 7 -12.72 15.72 0.74 0.81 13.37
0 H Massabesic ( 4- 9, 85.8) 19- 3 -14.15 14.29 -0.74 0.81 11.01
0 A Deering ( 8- 8, 91.9) 8- 5 -7.96 20.48 0.74 0.81 17.24
0 N Edward Little ( 8- 7, 84.2) 19- 2 -15.65 12.79 -0.00 0.81 10.39
0 A Thornton Acade (11- 4, 96.3) 3-10 -3.60 24.84 0.74 0.81 -2.32
------
79.87
|
winning pts = 114.0341 losing points = -34.1631
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------