---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:50 PDT

safe3step boys Salesianum School 1
  
Salesianum School     
W-L: ( 8- 0) PR = 99.9000

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 401 H Caesar Rodney (12- 3, 91.7) 18- 4 409 A Archmere Academy (10- 5, 89.8) 17- 1 414 H Cape Henlopen (12- 2, 96.1) 15- 5 513 A Tatnall School (14- 4, 91.0) 18- 6 520 H Caravel Academy ( 7- 7, 84.0) 19- 0 524 H Wilmington Friends (11- 6, 88.7) 19- 2 528 N Caesar Rodney (12- 3, 91.7) 17- 6 531 N Cape Henlopen (12- 2, 96.1) 12- 9

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   401 H Caesar Rodney          18- 4      14     8           0.00
   409 A Archmere Academy       17- 1      16    10           0.00
   414 H Cape Henlopen          15- 5      10     4           1.00
   513 A Tatnall School         18- 6      12     9           0.00
   520 H Caravel Academy        19- 0      19    16           0.00
   524 H Wilmington Friends     19- 2      17    11           0.00
   528 N Caesar Rodney          17- 6      11     8           0.00
   531 N Cape Henlopen          12- 9       3     4          -0.79

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Salesianum School Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alexis I du Pont Salesianum School   Salesianum School
Appoquinimink Salesianum School Salesianum School   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Archmere Academy Salesianum School Salesianum School  
Brandywine Salesianum School insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Salesianum School
Caesar Rodney Salesianum School Salesianum School  
Cape Henlopen Salesianum School Salesianum School  
Caravel Academy Salesianum School Salesianum School  
Concord Salesianum School insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Salesianum School
Conrad School Salesianum School insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Salesianum School
Delaware Military Ac Salesianum School Salesianum School   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Delcastle Salesianum School insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Salesianum School
Delmar Salesianum School   Salesianum School
Dover Salesianum School Salesianum School   2- 0 vs 0- 2
First State Military Salesianum School insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Salesianum School
Hodgson Vo-Tech Salesianum School   Salesianum School
Indian River Salesianum School   Salesianum School
McKean Salesianum School   Salesianum School
Middletown Salesianum School   Salesianum School
Milford Salesianum School Salesianum School   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Mount Pleasant Salesianum School   Salesianum School
Newark Charter Salesianum School Salesianum School   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Odessa Salesianum School   Salesianum School
Polytech Salesianum School Salesianum School   4- 0 vs 0- 4
Red Lion Christian Salesianum School insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Salesianum School
Sanford School Salesianum School Salesianum School   5- 0 vs 1- 4
Smyrna Salesianum School Salesianum School   5- 0 vs 1- 4
St Andrews School Salesianum School Salesianum School   3- 0 vs 1- 2
St Georges Tech Salesianum School   Salesianum School
St Marks Salesianum School Salesianum School   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Sussex Academy Salesianum School insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Salesianum School
Sussex Central Salesianum School Salesianum School   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Sussex Tech Salesianum School Salesianum School   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Tatnall School Salesianum School Salesianum School  
Tower Hill School Salesianum School Salesianum School   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Wilmington Charter Salesianum School Salesianum School   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Wilmington Christian Salesianum School Salesianum School   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Wilmington Friends Salesianum School Salesianum School  
Woodbridge Salesianum School   Salesianum School

PowerWise = 38


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 14.36

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Caesar Rodney   (12- 3, 91.7)    18- 4       -8.17      27.00      -0.21         1.79            48.09
   0 A Archmere Acade  (10- 5, 89.8)    17- 1      -10.15      25.03       0.21         1.79            45.29
   0 H Cape Henlopen   (12- 2, 96.1)    15- 5       -3.79      31.39      -0.21         1.79            55.96
   0 A Tatnall School  (14- 4, 91.0)    18- 6       -8.92      26.25       0.21         1.79            47.49
   0 H Caravel Academ  ( 7- 7, 84.0)    19- 0      -15.88      19.29      -0.21         1.79            34.25
   0 H Wilmington Fri  (11- 6, 88.7)    19- 2      -11.17      24.01      -0.21         1.79            42.72
   0 N Caesar Rodney   (12- 3, 91.7)    17- 6       -8.17      27.00      -0.00         1.79            48.47
   0 N Cape Henlopen   (12- 2, 96.1)    12- 9       -3.79      31.39      -0.00         1.79            56.34
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       378.62

winning pts = 378.6152 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------