River Bluff
W-L: ( 9- 6) PR = 89.7881Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 224 H Aiken ( 5- 6, 86.1) 16- 2 301 H Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 8-11 303 H Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 14- 5 306 A Spring Valley ( 9- 7, 81.7) 13- 1 310 A Academic Magnet Char ( 3-10, 79.5) 18- 2 313 A AC Flora (14- 4, 93.4) 2-12 315 H May River ( 9- 4, 91.3) 8-12 320 A Chapin (10- 7, 93.5) 5-18 322 H Fort Mill ( 9- 7, 92.3) 5- 9 327 H Blythewood ( 7- 8, 84.0) 14- 3 405 H White Knoll ( 6- 7, 85.3) 16-12 410 A Lexington ( 7- 9, 89.9) 11-10 417 A Byrnes ( 7- 8, 89.4) 12- 3 422 H Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 19- 5 425 A James Island Charter (10- 7, 90.1) 9-10
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
224 H Aiken 16- 2 14 4 0.95
301 H Dorman 8-11 -3 -3 0.14
303 H Dutch Fork 14- 5 9 5 0.19
306 A Spring Valley 13- 1 12 8 0.00
310 A Academic Magnet Char 18- 2 16 10 0.00
313 A AC Flora 2-12 -10 -4 -1.03
315 H May River 8-12 -4 -1 - -2.79
320 A Chapin 5-18 -13 -4 -0.92
322 H Fort Mill 5- 9 -4 -2 -1.86
327 H Blythewood 14- 3 11 6 0.00
405 H White Knoll 16-12 4 5 -0.82
410 A Lexington 11-10 1 0 1.40
417 A Byrnes 12- 3 9 0 ++ 4.97
422 H Dutch Fork 19- 5 14 5 0.19
425 A James Island Charter 9-10 -1 -1 -0.39
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 315 H May River 8-12 -4 -1 - -2.79 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 417 A Byrnes 12- 3 9 0 ++ 4.97 |
River Bluff Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | AC Flora | AC Flora | ||
| Academic Magnet Char | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Aiken | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Atlantic Collegiate | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Beaufort | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | River Bluff | |
| Bishop England | Bishop England | Bishop England 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Bluffton | River Bluff | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | River Bluff | |
| Blythewood | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Byrnes | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Camden Military Acad | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Carolina Forest | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | River Bluff | |
| Catawba Ridge | River Bluff | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Chapin | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Christ Church Episco | Christ Church Episco | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Christ Church Episco | |
| Clover | Clover | Clover 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Dorman | Dorman | Dorman | ||
| Dutch Fork | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Eastside | Eastside | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Eastside | |
| Fort Mill | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Fox Creek | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Gilbert | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Greenville | Greenville | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Greenville | |
| Hammond School | River Bluff | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Heathwood Hall | River Bluff | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Hillcrest | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Hilton Head | Hilton Head | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Hilton Head | |
| Hilton Head Christia | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | River Bluff | |
| James Island Charter | James Island Charter | James Island Charter | ||
| JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Laurence Manning Aca | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Legion Collegiate Ac | Legion Collegiate Ac | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Legion Collegiate Ac | |
| Lexington | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Mauldin | Mauldin | Mauldin 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| May River | May River | May River | ||
| Myrtle Beach | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | River Bluff | |
| Nation Ford | Nation Ford | Nation Ford 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| North Myrtle Beach | River Bluff | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Oceanside Academy | Oceanside Academy | Oceanside Academy 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Philip Simmons | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | River Bluff | |
| Porter-Gaud | Porter-Gaud | Porter-Gaud 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Riverside | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Socastee | River Bluff | tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) | River Bluff | |
| Spartanburg | River Bluff | tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) | River Bluff | |
| Spring Valley | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| St James | River Bluff | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | River Bluff | |
| St Joseph Catholic | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| TL Hanna | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | River Bluff | |
| Trinity Collegiate | River Bluff | River Bluff 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Waccamaw | River Bluff | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | River Bluff | |
| Wade Hampton | River Bluff | River Bluff 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Wando | Wando | Wando 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Westside | River Bluff | River Bluff 5- 1 vs 0- 6 | ||
| White Knoll | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Woodmont | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | River Bluff |
PowerWise = 35
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.54
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Aiken ( 5- 6, 86.1) 16- 2 -13.83 12.77 -0.33 0.90 11.23
0 H Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 8-11 -6.64 19.97 -0.33 0.90 -6.29
0 H Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 14- 5 -14.59 12.01 -0.33 0.90 10.55
0 A Spring Valley ( 9- 7, 81.7) 13- 1 -18.23 8.38 0.33 0.90 7.87
0 A Academic Magne ( 3-10, 79.5) 18- 2 -20.43 6.18 0.33 0.90 5.88
0 A AC Flora (14- 4, 93.4) 2-12 -6.48 20.12 0.33 0.90 -5.55
0 H May River ( 9- 4, 91.3) 8-12 -8.56 18.04 -0.33 0.90 -8.03
0 A Chapin (10- 7, 93.5) 5-18 -6.37 20.24 0.33 0.90 -5.45
0 H Fort Mill ( 9- 7, 92.3) 5- 9 -7.64 18.96 -0.33 0.90 -7.20
0 H Blythewood ( 7- 8, 84.0) 14- 3 -15.95 10.66 -0.33 0.90 9.32
0 H White Knoll ( 6- 7, 85.3) 16-12 -14.60 12.00 -0.33 0.90 10.54
0 A Lexington ( 7- 9, 89.9) 11-10 -10.05 16.56 0.33 0.90 15.25
0 A Byrnes ( 7- 8, 89.4) 12- 3 -10.48 16.12 0.33 0.90 14.86
0 H Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 19- 5 -14.59 12.01 -0.33 0.90 10.55
0 A James Island C (10- 7, 90.1) 9-10 -9.83 16.77 0.33 0.90 -8.58
------
54.94
|
winning pts = 96.0369 losing points = -41.1016
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------