Roy
W-L: ( 4-14) PR = 84.4934Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 306 A Mountain Ridge (14- 6, 91.6) 1-13 310 A Logan ( 2-17, 83.4) 6- 7 312 H Bonneville ( 1-17, 79.2) 14- 1 314 A Bingham ( 8-11, 89.2) 4- 6 319 A Maple Mountain (13- 7, 91.9) 0-15 324 H Syracuse ( 5-15, 85.3) 7-10 326 H Riverton ( 5-11, 86.5) 6- 8 328 H Layton ( 2-16, 81.0) 7- 3 409 A Cedar Valley (12- 6, 89.0) 5-10 411 A Waterford (12- 3, 89.6) 5-18 416 A Northridge (12- 6, 92.7) 4-13 418 H Box Elder ( 9-10, 89.2) 2- 6 423 H Bountiful (12- 8, 91.1) 0- 9 425 A Bonneville ( 1-17, 79.2) 10- 2 430 A Clearfield ( 8-11, 85.0) 8- 7 502 H Woods Cross (14- 6, 93.1) 3-15 507 A Viewmont ( 6-13, 85.0) 6- 8 513 A Bountiful (12- 8, 91.1) 3-17
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
306 A Mountain Ridge 1-13 -12 -8 0.00
310 A Logan 6- 7 -1 1 -1.54
312 H Bonneville 14- 1 13 6 0.00
314 A Bingham 4- 6 -2 -5 + 3.00
319 A Maple Mountain 0-15 -15 -8 0.00
324 H Syracuse 7-10 -3 0 - -2.70
326 H Riverton 6- 8 -2 -2 -0.49
328 H Layton 7- 3 4 4 -0.04
409 A Cedar Valley 5-10 -5 -5 0.00
411 A Waterford 5-18 -13 -6 0.00
416 A Northridge 4-13 -9 -9 0.00
418 H Box Elder 2- 6 -4 -4 0.21
423 H Bountiful 0- 9 -9 -6 0.00
425 A Bonneville 10- 2 8 5 0.18
430 A Clearfield 8- 7 1 -1 + 2.03
502 H Woods Cross 3-15 -12 -8 0.00
507 A Viewmont 6- 8 -2 -1 -0.93
513 A Bountiful 3-17 -14 -7 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 324 H Syracuse 7-10 -3 0 - -2.70 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 314 A Bingham 4- 6 -2 -5 + 3.00 430 A Clearfield 8- 7 1 -1 + 2.03 |
Roy Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alta | Alta | Alta 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| American Fork | American Fork | insuffient: ( 1- 5)( 2- 4) | American Fork | |
| Bear River | Bear River | Bear River 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Bingham | Bingham | Bingham | ||
| Bonneville | Roy | Roy | ||
| Bountiful | Bountiful | Bountiful | ||
| Box Elder | Box Elder | Box Elder | ||
| Brighton | Brighton | Brighton 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Canyon View | Roy | Roy | ||
| Cedar | Roy | Roy | ||
| Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Clearfield | Roy | Roy | ||
| Copper Hills | Copper Hills | insuffient: ( 0- 6)( 1- 5) | Copper Hills | |
| Corner Canyon | Corner Canyon | Corner Canyon 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Crimson Cliffs | Roy | Roy | ||
| Davis | Davis | Davis 6- 0 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Desert Hills | Roy | Roy | ||
| Dixie | Roy | Roy | ||
| East | East | East 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Farmington | Farmington | Farmington 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Fremont | Fremont | Fremont 5- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Green Canyon | Green Canyon | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Green Canyon | |
| Herriman | Herriman | Herriman 5- 1 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Highland | Highland | Highland 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Hillcrest | Roy | Roy 3- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Hurricane | Roy | Roy | ||
| Jordan | Roy | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Roy | |
| Juan Diego Catholic | Juan Diego Catholic | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Juan Diego Catholic | |
| Judge Memorial Catho | Judge Memorial Catho | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Judge Memorial Catho | |
| Layton | Roy | Roy | ||
| Lehi | Lehi | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Lehi | |
| Logan | Logan | Logan | ||
| Lone Peak | Lone Peak | Lone Peak 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain | ||
| Mountain Crest | Mountain Crest | Mountain Crest 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Mountain Ridge | Mountain Ridge | Mountain Ridge | ||
| Mountain View | Roy | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Roy | |
| Northridge | Northridge | Northridge | ||
| Olympus | Olympus | Olympus 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Orem | Roy | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Roy | |
| Park City | Park City | Park City 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Payson | Payson | Payson | ||
| Pine View | Roy | Roy | ||
| Pleasant Grove | Pleasant Grove | insuffient: ( 0- 5)( 1- 4) | Pleasant Grove | |
| Provo | Roy | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 0- 4) | Roy | |
| Ridgeline | Ridgeline | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Ridgeline | |
| Riverton | Riverton | Riverton | ||
| Salem Hills | Salem Hills | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Salem Hills | |
| Sky View | Sky View | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Sky View | |
| Skyline | Skyline | Skyline 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Skyridge | Skyridge | Skyridge 5- 0 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Snow Canyon | Snow Canyon | Snow Canyon | ||
| Spanish Fork | Spanish Fork | Spanish Fork 4- 3 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Springville | Springville | tied - ( 1- 4) ( 1- 4) | Springville | |
| Syracuse | Syracuse | Syracuse | ||
| Timpanogos | Timpanogos | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Timpanogos | |
| Timpview | Timpview | insuffient: ( 1- 5)( 2- 4) | Timpview | |
| Viewmont | Viewmont | Viewmont | ||
| Wasatch | Wasatch | tied - ( 1- 4) ( 1- 4) | Wasatch | |
| Waterford | Waterford | Waterford | ||
| Weber | Weber | Weber 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| West | Roy | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Roy | |
| West Field | West Field | West Field 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| West Jordan | Roy | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Roy | |
| Westlake | Westlake | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Westlake | |
| Woods Cross | Woods Cross | Woods Cross |
PowerWise = 17
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 18.63
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Mountain Ridge (14- 6, 91.6) 1-13 -8.26 21.25 0.53 1.03 -8.00
0 A Logan ( 2-17, 83.4) 6- 7 -16.47 13.04 0.53 1.03 -16.50
0 H Bonneville ( 1-17, 79.2) 14- 1 -20.75 8.76 -0.53 1.03 8.52
0 A Bingham ( 8-11, 89.2) 4- 6 -10.71 18.80 0.53 1.03 -10.54
0 A Maple Mountain (13- 7, 91.9) 0-15 -8.03 21.48 0.53 1.03 -7.77
0 H Syracuse ( 5-15, 85.3) 7-10 -14.58 14.93 -0.53 1.03 -15.63
0 H Riverton ( 5-11, 86.5) 6- 8 -13.37 16.14 -0.53 1.03 -14.38
0 H Layton ( 2-16, 81.0) 7- 3 -18.92 10.59 -0.53 1.03 10.42
0 A Cedar Valley (12- 6, 89.0) 5-10 -10.89 18.62 0.53 1.03 -10.72
0 A Waterford (12- 3, 89.6) 5-18 -10.32 19.20 0.53 1.03 -10.13
0 A Northridge (12- 6, 92.7) 4-13 -7.16 22.35 0.53 1.03 -6.87
0 H Box Elder ( 9-10, 89.2) 2- 6 -10.68 18.83 -0.53 1.03 -11.59
0 H Bountiful (12- 8, 91.1) 0- 9 -8.83 20.68 -0.53 1.03 -9.68
0 A Bonneville ( 1-17, 79.2) 10- 2 -20.75 8.76 0.53 1.03 9.61
0 A Clearfield ( 8-11, 85.0) 8- 7 -14.90 14.61 0.53 1.03 15.66
0 H Woods Cross (14- 6, 93.1) 3-15 -6.81 22.70 -0.53 1.03 -7.59
0 A Viewmont ( 6-13, 85.0) 6- 8 -14.86 14.65 0.53 1.03 -14.83
0 A Bountiful (12- 8, 91.1) 3-17 -8.83 20.68 0.53 1.03 -8.59
------
-108.60
|
winning pts = 44.2145 losing points = -152.8175
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------