---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 17:13 PDT

safe3step boys Rogers 1
  
Rogers                
W-L: (12- 3) PR = 94.9420

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 317 A Auburn Riverside ( 9- 3, 91.2) 13- 7 319 A Mount Si (17- 2, 99.9) 4-18 320 A Enumclaw ( 6- 8, 88.1) 11- 6 403 H Curtis (11- 4, 97.9) 14-13 404 A Bellingham ( 5- 7, 83.3) 17- 3 405 A Arlington ( 3-12, 85.8) 19- 3 414 H Emerald Ridge ( 2-12, 83.1) 19- 5 415 H Graham Kapowsin ( 5- 8, 88.7) 17-12 418 A Bonney Lake ( 8- 4, 87.5) 16- 5 422 A Bellarmine Prep ( 8- 6, 96.0) 7-13 423 H Puyallup ( 2-11, 85.6) 20- 7 428 A Sumner ( 7- 6, 91.8) 14- 4 430 A Tahoma ( 7- 6, 92.7) 13- 4 510 H Camas ( 6- 5, 89.1) 13- 5 516 H Bothell (11- 5, 96.2) 14-19

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   317 A Auburn Riverside       13- 7       6     3           1.76
   319 A Mount Si                4-18     -14    -5           0.00
   320 A Enumclaw               11- 6       5     6           0.00
   403 H Curtis                 14-13       1    -2    +      3.46
   404 A Bellingham             17- 3      14    11           0.00
   405 A Arlington              19- 3      16     9           0.00
   414 H Emerald Ridge          19- 5      14    12           0.00
   415 H Graham Kapowsin        17-12       5     7           0.00
   418 A Bonney Lake            16- 5      11     7           0.00
   422 A Bellarmine Prep         7-13      -6    -2    -     -3.46
   423 H Puyallup               20- 7      13    10           0.00
   428 A Sumner                 14- 4      10     3    +      2.34
   430 A Tahoma                 13- 4       9     2    +      3.25
   510 H Camas                  13- 5       8     6           0.00
   516 H Bothell                14-19      -5    -1    --    -4.22

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   516 H Bothell                14-19      -5    -1    --    -4.22
   422 A Bellarmine Prep         7-13      -6    -2    -     -3.46

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   403 H Curtis                 14-13       1    -2    +      3.46
   428 A Sumner                 14- 4      10     3    +      2.34
   430 A Tahoma                 13- 4       9     2    +      3.25

Rogers Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Anacortes Rogers tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Rogers
Archbishop Murphy Rogers   Rogers
Arlington Rogers Rogers  
Auburn Riverside Rogers Rogers  
Bainbridge Island Rogers Rogers   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Ballard Rogers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rogers
Bellarmine Prep Bellarmine Prep Bellarmine Prep  
Bellevue Bellevue insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Bellevue
Bellingham Rogers Rogers  
Blanchet Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Bonney Lake Rogers Rogers  
Bothell Bothell Bothell  
Burlington-Edison Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Camas Rogers Rogers  
Cedarcrest Rogers   Rogers
Chiawana Rogers insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Rogers
Curtis Rogers Rogers  
East Valley Rogers   Rogers
Eastlake Eastlake insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 2) Eastlake
Eastside Catholic Rogers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rogers
Emerald Ridge Rogers Rogers  
Enumclaw Rogers Rogers  
Franklin Rogers   Rogers
Gig Harbor Rogers Rogers   5- 0 vs 3- 2
Glacier Peak Rogers insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Rogers
Graham Kapowsin Rogers Rogers  
Hanford Rogers   Rogers
Hermiston Rogers   Rogers
Inglemoor Rogers   Rogers
Interlake Rogers   Rogers
Issaquah Rogers tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Rogers
Jackson Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Juanita Rogers tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Rogers
Kamiak Rogers   Rogers
Kamiakin Rogers tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Rogers
Kennedy Catholic Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Klahowya Rogers   Rogers
Lake Stevens Rogers tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Rogers
Lake Washington Rogers   Rogers
Lakeside Rogers   Rogers
Liberty Rogers   Rogers
Lincoln Rogers insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Rogers
Lynden Rogers tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Rogers
Marysville Getchell Rogers   Rogers
Mercer Island Mercer Island Mercer Island   5- 0 vs 2- 3
Monroe Rogers   Rogers
Mount Si Mount Si Mount Si  
Mount Vernon Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Mountain View Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Nathan Hale Rogers tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Rogers
Newport Rogers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rogers
North Creek Rogers   Rogers
North Kitsap Rogers   Rogers
O'Dea O'Dea tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) O'Dea
Olympia Rogers tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Rogers
Orting Rogers Rogers   6- 0 vs 2- 4
Overlake Rogers   Rogers
Peninsula Rogers Rogers   5- 0 vs 2- 3
Providence Classical Rogers   Rogers
Puyallup Rogers Rogers  
Redmond Rogers   Rogers
Richland Rogers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rogers
Roosevelt Rogers tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Rogers
Sammamish Rogers   Rogers
Seattle Academy Rogers tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Rogers
Seattle Prep Seattle Prep insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Seattle Prep
Sedro-Woolley Rogers   Rogers
Sehome Rogers   Rogers
Selah Rogers   Rogers
Shorecrest Rogers tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Rogers
Skyline Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Rogers
Skyview Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Snohomish Rogers tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Rogers
South Kitsap Rogers Rogers   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Southridge Rogers   Rogers
Squalicum Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Stadium Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Stanwood Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Sumner Rogers Rogers  
Tahoma Rogers Rogers  
Union Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rogers
Vashon Island Rogers   Rogers
Walla Walla Rogers   Rogers
Wenatchee Rogers   Rogers
West Seattle Rogers   Rogers
White River Rogers Rogers   4- 0 vs 0- 4
Woodinville Rogers insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Rogers

PowerWise = 79


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 11.34

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Auburn Riversi  ( 9- 3, 91.2)    13- 7       -8.72      17.08       0.52         0.76            13.31
   0 A Mount Si        (17- 2, 99.9)     4-18       -0.00      25.80       0.52         0.76            -0.39
   0 A Enumclaw        ( 6- 8, 88.1)    11- 6      -11.83      13.97       0.52         0.76            10.96
   0 H Curtis          (11- 4, 97.9)    14-13       -1.98      23.82      -0.52         0.76            17.62
   0 A Bellingham      ( 5- 7, 83.3)    17- 3      -16.64       9.16       0.52         0.76             7.32
   0 A Arlington       ( 3-12, 85.8)    19- 3      -14.12      11.68       0.52         0.76             9.22
   0 H Emerald Ridge   ( 2-12, 83.1)    19- 5      -16.79       9.01      -0.52         0.76             6.42
   0 H Graham Kapowsi  ( 5- 8, 88.7)    17-12      -11.18      14.62      -0.52         0.76            10.66
   0 A Bonney Lake     ( 8- 4, 87.5)    16- 5      -12.38      13.42       0.52         0.76            10.54
   0 A Bellarmine Pre  ( 8- 6, 96.0)     7-13       -3.94      21.86       0.52         0.76            -2.58
   0 H Puyallup        ( 2-11, 85.6)    20- 7      -14.30      11.50      -0.52         0.76             8.30
   0 A Sumner          ( 7- 6, 91.8)    14- 4       -8.14      17.66       0.52         0.76            13.74
   0 A Tahoma          ( 7- 6, 92.7)    13- 4       -7.23      18.57       0.52         0.76            14.43
   0 H Camas           ( 6- 5, 89.1)    13- 5      -10.84      14.96      -0.52         0.76            10.92
   0 H Bothell         (11- 5, 96.2)    14-19       -3.66      22.14      -0.52         0.76            -3.16
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       127.30

winning pts = 133.4386 losing points = -6.1352

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------