Plymouth Regional
W-L: (15- 2) PR = 89.7747Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 A Gilford ( 6- 9, 82.9) 9- 4 416 H Milford ( 1-13, 78.5) 13- 1 418 A Inter-Lakes-Moultonb ( 1-13, 82.3) 10- 2 421 H Kearsarge (10- 6, 88.1) 6- 5 505 H Hopkinton (12- 4, 90.7) 9- 7 507 A Laconia (11- 5, 88.6) 7- 6 508 A Stevens ( 0-14, 73.3) 14- 0 512 H Lebanon ( 8- 8, 85.5) 8- 3 514 H Campbell (12- 6, 88.8) 5- 6 516 H Pelham ( 7- 8, 85.6) 15-10 519 H Bishop Brady (10- 6, 86.4) 6- 4 521 A Trinity Manchester ( 3-11, 82.2) 11- 1 523 A Bow (11- 4, 89.9) 5- 9 528 A Kennett ( 4-10, 82.8) 11- 1 607 A Lebanon ( 8- 8, 85.5) 11- 3 612 N Campbell (12- 6, 88.8) 7- 6 614 N Coe-Brown (17- 1, 93.1) 7- 5
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 A Gilford 9- 4 5 6 0.00
416 H Milford 13- 1 12 12 0.00
418 A Inter-Lakes-Moultonb 10- 2 8 7 0.00
421 H Kearsarge 6- 5 1 2 -1.07
505 H Hopkinton 9- 7 2 -1 + 2.55
507 A Laconia 7- 6 1 1 0.25
508 A Stevens 14- 0 14 16 0.00
512 H Lebanon 8- 3 5 5 0.37
514 H Campbell 5- 6 -1 1 - -2.35
516 H Pelham 15-10 5 5 0.45
519 H Bishop Brady 6- 4 2 4 -1.79
521 A Trinity Manchester 11- 1 10 7 0.00
523 A Bow 5- 9 -4 0 - -3.52
528 A Kennett 11- 1 10 7 0.00
607 A Lebanon 11- 3 8 4 1.12
612 N Campbell 7- 6 1 1 0.03
614 N Coe-Brown 7- 5 2 -3 ++ 5.28
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 514 H Campbell 5- 6 -1 1 - -2.35 523 A Bow 5- 9 -4 0 - -3.52 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 614 N Coe-Brown 7- 5 2 -3 ++ 5.28 505 H Hopkinton 9- 7 2 -1 + 2.55 |
Plymouth Regional Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford | ||
| Bishop Brady | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Bow | Bow | ||
| Campbell | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional 10- 1 vs 6- 5 | ||
| Coe-Brown | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Concord | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| ConVal | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional 13- 2 vs 8- 6 | ||
| Derryfield | Derryfield | Derryfield | ||
| Dover | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Goffstown | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Hanover | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Hollis-Brookline | Hollis-Brookline | ||
| Hopkinton | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| John Stark | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional 12- 2 vs 3-10 | ||
| Kearsarge | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Kennett | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Kingswood | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Laconia | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Lebanon | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Londonderry | Londonderry | Londonderry | ||
| Manchester Memorial- | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Merrimack | Merrimack | Merrimack | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Milford | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Nashua North | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Nashua South | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Oyster River-Newmark | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Pelham | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Plymouth Regional | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Plymouth Regional | |
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Souhegan | Plymouth Regional | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) | Plymouth Regional | |
| Spaulding | Plymouth Regional | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Plymouth Regional | |
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Stevens | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Timberlane | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Windham | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet |
PowerWise = 34
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 16.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Gilford ( 6- 9, 82.9) 9- 4 -16.97 9.62 0.38 0.96 9.59
0 H Milford ( 1-13, 78.5) 13- 1 -21.44 5.16 -0.38 0.96 4.58
0 A Inter-Lakes-Mo ( 1-13, 82.3) 10- 2 -17.57 9.03 0.38 0.96 9.02
0 H Kearsarge (10- 6, 88.1) 6- 5 -11.82 14.78 -0.38 0.96 13.81
0 H Hopkinton (12- 4, 90.7) 9- 7 -9.20 17.40 -0.38 0.96 16.32
0 A Laconia (11- 5, 88.6) 7- 6 -11.25 15.34 0.38 0.96 15.07
0 A Stevens ( 0-14, 73.3) 14- 0 -26.60 1.00 0.38 0.96 1.32
0 H Lebanon ( 8- 8, 85.5) 8- 3 -14.38 12.22 -0.38 0.96 11.35
0 H Campbell (12- 6, 88.8) 5- 6 -11.10 15.50 -0.38 0.96 -11.00
0 H Pelham ( 7- 8, 85.6) 15-10 -14.30 12.29 -0.38 0.96 11.43
0 H Bishop Brady (10- 6, 86.4) 6- 4 -13.54 13.05 -0.38 0.96 12.15
0 A Trinity Manche ( 3-11, 82.2) 11- 1 -17.70 8.89 0.38 0.96 8.89
0 A Bow (11- 4, 89.9) 5- 9 -10.02 16.58 0.38 0.96 -9.24
0 A Kennett ( 4-10, 82.8) 11- 1 -17.09 9.50 0.38 0.96 9.47
0 A Lebanon ( 8- 8, 85.5) 11- 3 -14.38 12.22 0.38 0.96 12.07
0 N Campbell (12- 6, 88.8) 7- 6 -11.10 15.50 -0.00 0.96 14.86
0 N Coe-Brown (17- 1, 93.1) 7- 5 -6.85 19.75 -0.00 0.96 18.93
------
148.61
|
winning pts = 168.8573 losing points = -20.2468
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------