Pinkerton Academy
W-L: (15- 2) PR = 96.5035Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 H Salem ( 5-10, 85.1) 21- 0 417 A Merrimack (10- 6, 91.4) 6- 3 421 H Dover ( 9-11, 87.6) 17- 9 424 H Manchester Memorial- ( 3-12, 84.6) 20- 1 428 A Keene-Monadnock ( 3-12, 84.0) 23- 0 430 A Nashua South ( 8-11, 86.2) 17- 1 505 H Exeter HS (11- 6, 94.3) 11- 8 507 H Londonderry (10- 8, 90.5) 16- 9 513 H Bishop Guertin (15- 0, 99.9) 8-16 516 A Windham ( 6-10, 87.1) 22- 2 517 A Portsmouth (16- 4, 92.5) 10- 9 519 H Concord ( 8-10, 88.3) 17- 1 528 H Nashua North ( 1-17, 82.5) 19- 2 530 A Bedford (13- 3, 96.0) 20- 7 607 H Dover ( 9-11, 87.6) 14- 1 611 N Exeter HS (11- 6, 94.3) 13- 6 614 N Bishop Guertin (15- 0, 99.9) 5-19
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 H Salem 21- 0 21 12 0.00
417 A Merrimack 6- 3 3 5 -1.71
421 H Dover 17- 9 8 9 0.00
424 H Manchester Memorial- 20- 1 19 12 0.00
428 A Keene-Monadnock 23- 0 23 12 0.00
430 A Nashua South 17- 1 16 10 0.00
505 H Exeter HS 11- 8 3 3 0.39
507 H Londonderry 16- 9 7 6 0.00
513 H Bishop Guertin 8-16 -8 -3 -1.98
516 A Windham 22- 2 20 9 0.00
517 A Portsmouth 10- 9 1 4 - -2.60
519 H Concord 17- 1 16 9 0.00
528 H Nashua North 19- 2 17 14 0.00
530 A Bedford 20- 7 13 0 ++ 4.86
607 H Dover 14- 1 13 9 0.00
611 N Exeter HS 13- 6 7 2 + 2.77
614 N Bishop Guertin 5-19 -14 -3 -1.60
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 517 A Portsmouth 10- 9 1 4 - -2.60 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 530 A Bedford 20- 7 13 0 ++ 4.86 611 N Exeter HS 13- 6 7 2 + 2.77 |
Pinkerton Academy Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Bedford | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Bishop Brady | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Campbell | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Coe-Brown | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Concord | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| ConVal | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Derryfield | Pinkerton Academy | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Dover | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Exeter HS | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Gilford | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Goffstown | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Hanover | Pinkerton Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Hollis-Brookline | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 5- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Hopkinton | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| John Stark | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Kearsarge | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Kennett | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Kingswood | Pinkerton Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Laconia | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Lebanon | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Londonderry | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Manchester Memorial- | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Merrimack | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Pinkerton Academy | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Milford | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Nashua North | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Nashua South | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Oyster River-Newmark | Pinkerton Academy | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Pelham | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Pinkerton Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Plymouth Regional | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Portsmouth | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Salem | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Souhegan | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Spaulding | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | Pinkerton Academy | insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Stevens | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Timberlane | Pinkerton Academy | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Trinity Manchester | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Windham | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Winnacunnet | Pinkerton Academy | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Pinkerton Academy |
PowerWise = 45
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 16.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Salem ( 5-10, 85.1) 21- 0 -14.76 11.83 -0.38 0.96 10.98
0 A Merrimack (10- 6, 91.4) 6- 3 -8.48 18.12 0.38 0.96 17.73
0 H Dover ( 9-11, 87.6) 17- 9 -12.34 14.26 -0.38 0.96 13.31
0 H Manchester Mem ( 3-12, 84.6) 20- 1 -15.25 11.34 -0.38 0.96 10.51
0 A Keene-Monadnoc ( 3-12, 84.0) 23- 0 -15.85 10.74 0.38 0.96 10.66
0 A Nashua South ( 8-11, 86.2) 17- 1 -13.67 12.93 0.38 0.96 12.76
0 H Exeter HS (11- 6, 94.3) 11- 8 -5.63 20.96 -0.38 0.96 19.74
0 H Londonderry (10- 8, 90.5) 16- 9 -9.36 17.23 -0.38 0.96 16.16
0 H Bishop Guertin (15- 0, 99.9) 8-16 -0.00 26.60 -0.38 0.96 -0.36
0 A Windham ( 6-10, 87.1) 22- 2 -12.80 13.79 0.38 0.96 13.58
0 A Portsmouth (16- 4, 92.5) 10- 9 -7.37 19.22 0.38 0.96 18.79
0 H Concord ( 8-10, 88.3) 17- 1 -11.56 15.04 -0.38 0.96 14.06
0 H Nashua North ( 1-17, 82.5) 19- 2 -17.43 9.17 -0.38 0.96 8.43
0 A Bedford (13- 3, 96.0) 20- 7 -3.91 22.68 0.38 0.96 22.11
0 H Dover ( 9-11, 87.6) 14- 1 -12.34 14.26 -0.38 0.96 13.31
0 N Exeter HS (11- 6, 94.3) 13- 6 -5.63 20.96 -0.00 0.96 20.10
0 N Bishop Guertin (15- 0, 99.9) 5-19 -0.00 26.60 -0.00 0.96 -0.00
------
221.85
|
winning pts = 222.2147 losing points = -0.3614
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------