---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:54 PDT

safe3step boys New Trier 1
  
New Trier             
W-L: (16- 5) PR = 96.6170

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 318 A Hersey (12- 8, 90.5) 14- 2 320 A St Viator (18- 2, 99.9) 4-11 408 A Highland Park ( 9- 8, 86.0) 20- 6 410 H Glenbard West (14- 8, 94.4) 11- 5 412 H York (11-10, 92.5) 10- 5 417 A Evanston Township ( 9- 7, 90.2) 13- 4 423 A Maine South (10-10, 90.8) 15-12 425 A Loyola Academy (11- 3, 97.0) 11-10 428 H Glenbrook North (14- 5, 93.9) 7- 8 501 H Glenbrook South ( 5-13, 86.9) 11- 3 508 H Deerfield (13- 5, 93.5) 12- 3 510 H Wheaton Academy (16- 3, 97.3) 7-10 513 A Vernon Hills ( 6-14, 85.2) 12- 4 517 H Lane Tech ( 9- 8, 84.0) 12- 2 522 H Lake Forest HS (22- 1, 98.3) 3- 5 526 N Notre Dame ( 5-15, 83.2) 16- 1 528 H DePaul Prep (14- 6, 90.6) 11- 4 530 H Loyola Academy (11- 3, 97.0) 6- 4 603 N Glenbard West (14- 8, 94.4) 9- 6 605 N Wheaton Academy (16- 3, 97.3) 11- 7 607 N Lake Forest HS (22- 1, 98.3) 5- 8

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   318 A Hersey                 14- 2      12     5           0.00
   320 A St Viator               4-11      -7    -4          -1.10
   408 A Highland Park          20- 6      14    10           0.00
   410 H Glenbard West          11- 5       6     3    +      2.15
   412 H York                   10- 5       5     5           0.31
   417 A Evanston Township      13- 4       9     6           0.00
   423 A Maine South            15-12       3     5    -     -2.00
   425 A Loyola Academy         11-10       1    -1           1.97
   428 H Glenbrook North         7- 8      -1     3    --    -4.30
   501 H Glenbrook South        11- 3       8    10           0.00
   508 H Deerfield              12- 3       9     4           1.23
   510 H Wheaton Academy         7-10      -3     0    -     -2.95
   513 A Vernon Hills           12- 4       8    11           0.00
   517 H Lane Tech              12- 2      10    13           0.00
   522 H Lake Forest HS          3- 5      -2    -1          -0.96
   526 N Notre Dame             16- 1      15    13           0.00
   528 H DePaul Prep            11- 4       7     7           0.00
   530 H Loyola Academy          6- 4       2     0           1.73
   603 N Glenbard West           9- 6       3     2           0.77
   605 N Wheaton Academy        11- 7       4    -1    ++     4.67
   607 N Lake Forest HS          5- 8      -3    -2          -1.34

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   428 H Glenbrook North         7- 8      -1     3    --    -4.30
   423 A Maine South            15-12       3     5    -     -2.00
   510 H Wheaton Academy         7-10      -3     0    -     -2.95

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   605 N Wheaton Academy        11- 7       4    -1    ++     4.67
   410 H Glenbard West          11- 5       6     3    +      2.15

New Trier Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Andrew-Sandburg-Stag New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) New Trier
Antioch New Trier tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) New Trier
Barrington New Trier insuffient: ( 2- 4)( 1- 4) New Trier
Batavia New Trier   New Trier
Benet Academy New Trier New Trier   4- 2 vs 2- 3
Boylan Catholic New Trier   New Trier
Brother Rice New Trier New Trier   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Buffalo Grove New Trier New Trier   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Burlington Central New Trier   New Trier
Carmel Catholic New Trier tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) New Trier
Cary Grove New Trier   New Trier
Conant New Trier New Trier   3- 0 vs 0- 2
Crystal Lake Central New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Crystal Lake South New Trier   New Trier
Deerfield New Trier New Trier  
DePaul Prep New Trier New Trier  
Downers Grove New Trier insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) New Trier
Dundee-Crown New Trier   New Trier
Dunlap New Trier   New Trier
Elk Grove New Trier   New Trier
Evanston Township New Trier New Trier  
Fenwick New Trier New Trier   5- 0 vs 1- 4
Fremd New Trier tied - ( 2- 3) ( 2- 2) New Trier
Geneva New Trier tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) New Trier
Glenbard North New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Glenbard West New Trier New Trier  
Glenbrook North Glenbrook North Glenbrook North  
Glenbrook South New Trier New Trier  
Grant Community New Trier tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) New Trier
Grayslake Co-op New Trier New Trier   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Hampshire New Trier   New Trier
Hersey New Trier New Trier  
Highland Park New Trier New Trier  
Hinsdale Central New Trier New Trier   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Hoffman Estates New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Homewood Flossmoor New Trier   New Trier
Huntley New Trier insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) New Trier
Immaculate Conceptio New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Jacobs New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Kaneland New Trier   New Trier
Kenwood New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Lake Forest Academy New Trier insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) New Trier
Lake Forest HS Lake Forest HS Lake Forest HS  
Lake Park New Trier   New Trier
Lake Zurich New Trier insuffient: ( 5- 4)( 4- 4) New Trier
Lakes Community New Trier tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) New Trier
Lane Tech New Trier New Trier  
Latin School New Trier New Trier   5- 0 vs 1- 4
Lemont New Trier   New Trier
Libertyville New Trier New Trier   4- 1 vs 2- 3
Lincoln Park New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Lincoln-Way New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Lockport Township New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Loyola Academy New Trier New Trier  
Lyons Township New Trier New Trier   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Maine South New Trier New Trier  
Marian Central Catho New Trier   New Trier
Marist New Trier New Trier   3- 2 vs 1- 3
Marmion Academy New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
McHenry New Trier   New Trier
Minooka New Trier   New Trier
Montini Catholic New Trier New Trier   3- 1 vs 0- 3
Mount Carmel New Trier insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) New Trier
Mundelein New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) New Trier
Naperville Central New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) New Trier
Naperville North New Trier   New Trier
Nazareth Academy New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) New Trier
Neuqua Valley New Trier New Trier   3- 2 vs 0- 3
Normal Community New Trier   New Trier
Northside College Pr New Trier New Trier   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Notre Dame New Trier New Trier  
Oak Forest New Trier tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) New Trier
Oak Park-River Fores New Trier New Trier   6- 0 vs 1- 5
Palatine New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Plainfield North New Trier   New Trier
Prairie Ridge New Trier   New Trier
Prospect New Trier New Trier   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Providence Catholic New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Riverside Brookfield New Trier   New Trier
Rolling Meadows New Trier New Trier   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Schaumburg New Trier New Trier   3- 0 vs 1- 2
South Elgin New Trier insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) New Trier
St Charles East New Trier   New Trier
St Charles North New Trier New Trier   2- 1 vs 0- 2
St Francis New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
St Ignatius Prep New Trier New Trier   7- 4 vs 4- 6
St Laurence New Trier New Trier   2- 0 vs 0- 2
St Patrick New Trier New Trier   3- 1 vs 0- 4
St Rita New Trier New Trier   3- 0 vs 1- 2
St Viator St Viator St Viator  
Stevenson New Trier tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) New Trier
Taft HS New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Timothy Christian New Trier   New Trier
Vernon Hills New Trier New Trier  
Warren Township New Trier New Trier   4- 2 vs 2- 4
Washington New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Waubonsie-Metea Co-O New Trier   New Trier
Wauconda New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Wheaton Academy Wheaton Academy tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) Wheaton Academy
Wheaton North New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Wheaton South New Trier   New Trier
Wheeling New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
Whitney Young New Trier insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) New Trier
York New Trier New Trier  

PowerWise = 100


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 17.71

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Hersey          (12- 8, 90.5)    14- 2       -9.37      20.19       0.62         0.84            17.55
   0 A St Viator       (18- 2, 99.9)     4-11       -0.00      29.56       0.62         0.84            -0.52
   0 A Highland Park   ( 9- 8, 86.0)    20- 6      -13.90      15.66       0.62         0.84            13.73
   0 H Glenbard West   (14- 8, 94.4)    11- 5       -5.51      24.05      -0.62         0.84            19.76
   0 H York            (11-10, 92.5)    10- 5       -7.35      22.20      -0.62         0.84            18.21
   0 A Evanston Towns  ( 9- 7, 90.2)    13- 4       -9.68      19.88       0.62         0.84            17.29
   0 A Maine South     (10-10, 90.8)    15-12       -9.07      20.49       0.62         0.84            17.81
   0 A Loyola Academy  (11- 3, 97.0)    11-10       -2.93      26.63       0.62         0.84            22.98
   0 H Glenbrook Nort  (14- 5, 93.9)     7- 8       -5.97      23.59      -0.62         0.84            -5.56
   0 H Glenbrook Sout  ( 5-13, 86.9)    11- 3      -12.99      16.57      -0.62         0.84            13.46
   0 H Deerfield       (13- 5, 93.5)    12- 3       -6.44      23.12      -0.62         0.84            18.98
   0 H Wheaton Academ  (16- 3, 97.3)     7-10       -2.61      26.95      -0.62         0.84            -2.73
   0 A Vernon Hills    ( 6-14, 85.2)    12- 4      -14.68      14.88       0.62         0.84            13.07
   0 H Lane Tech       ( 9- 8, 84.0)    12- 2      -15.86      13.70      -0.62         0.84            11.04
   0 H Lake Forest HS  (22- 1, 98.3)     3- 5       -1.63      27.93      -0.62         0.84            -1.89
   0 N Notre Dame      ( 5-15, 83.2)    16- 1      -16.68      12.88      -0.00         0.84            10.87
   0 H DePaul Prep     (14- 6, 90.6)    11- 4       -9.29      20.27      -0.62         0.84            16.58
   0 H Loyola Academy  (11- 3, 97.0)     6- 4       -2.93      26.63      -0.62         0.84            21.94
   0 N Glenbard West   (14- 8, 94.4)     9- 6       -5.51      24.05      -0.00         0.84            20.28
   0 N Wheaton Academ  (16- 3, 97.3)    11- 7       -2.61      26.95      -0.00         0.84            22.73
   0 N Lake Forest HS  (22- 1, 98.3)     5- 8       -1.63      27.93      -0.00         0.84            -1.37
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       264.22

winning pts = 276.2877 losing points = -12.0685

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------