Neenah
W-L: (13- 7) PR = 97.6918Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 408 A Brookfield ( 0-15, 84.6) 17- 0 410 H Kimberly (13- 5, 97.0) 9-10 415 H Middleton (15- 2, 99.8) 3- 8 418 A De Pere ( 8- 9, 91.0) 14- 6 421 A Notre Dame Green Ba ( 7-12, 89.0) 17- 4 426 H Marquette University (15- 5, 95.5) 20- 4 426 A Arrowhead (10- 6, 94.1) 19- 5 429 A Pulaski ( 0-19, 82.5) 26- 1 503 N DeForest ( 8- 7, 94.8) 6- 7 503 N Mukwonago (13- 5, 97.5) 5- 4 505 A Appleton (12- 6, 96.1) 7- 8 508 H Waunakee (18- 3, 99.9) 7- 5 510 A Hudson ( 3- 3, 97.1) 9-10 513 H Wausau ( 6-11, 91.5) 20- 5 517 H Verona (12- 4, 96.6) 8- 9 519 H Oneida Nation ( 3-10, 88.8) 21- 3 520 H Bay Port ( 9- 6, 93.8) 17- 3 529 H Janesville ( 9- 9, 93.0) 14- 1 603 A Verona (12- 4, 96.6) 11- 4 605 A Waunakee (18- 3, 99.9) 7- 8
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
408 A Brookfield 17- 0 17 12 0.00
410 H Kimberly 9-10 -1 2 - -2.55
415 H Middleton 3- 8 -5 -1 - -3.72
418 A De Pere 14- 6 8 6 0.00
421 A Notre Dame Green Ba 17- 4 13 8 0.00
426 H Marquette University 20- 4 16 3 1.93
426 A Arrowhead 19- 5 14 3 + 2.29
429 A Pulaski 26- 1 25 14 0.00
503 N DeForest 6- 7 -1 3 - -3.90
503 N Mukwonago 5- 4 1 0 0.85
505 A Appleton 7- 8 -1 1 -1.74
508 H Waunakee 7- 5 2 -1 + 3.35
510 A Hudson 9-10 -1 0 -0.71
513 H Wausau 20- 5 15 7 0.00
517 H Verona 8- 9 -1 2 - -2.90
519 H Oneida Nation 21- 3 18 10 0.00
520 H Bay Port 17- 3 14 5 0.24
529 H Janesville 14- 1 13 6 0.00
603 A Verona 11- 4 7 0 ++ 4.80
605 A Waunakee 7- 8 -1 -3 + 2.06
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 410 H Kimberly 9-10 -1 2 - -2.55 415 H Middleton 3- 8 -5 -1 - -3.72 503 N DeForest 6- 7 -1 3 - -3.90 517 H Verona 8- 9 -1 2 - -2.90 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 603 A Verona 11- 4 7 0 ++ 4.80 426 A Arrowhead 19- 5 14 3 + 2.29 508 H Waunakee 7- 5 2 -1 + 3.35 605 A Waunakee 7- 8 -1 -3 + 2.06 |
Neenah Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appleton | Appleton | Appleton | ||
| Arrowhead | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Bay Port | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Brookfield | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Catholic Memorial | Neenah | Neenah 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Cedarburg | Neenah | Neenah 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| De Pere | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| DeForest | DeForest | DeForest | ||
| Elkhorn | Neenah | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Neenah | |
| Franklin | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Hamilton | Neenah | Neenah 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Homestead | Neenah | Neenah 5- 2 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Hudson | Hudson | Hudson | ||
| Janesville | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Kenosha | Neenah | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Neenah | |
| Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine | insuffient: ( 5- 3)( 6- 1) | Kettle Moraine | |
| Kimberly | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| La Crosse | Neenah | insuffient: ( 4- 2)( 3- 2) | Neenah | |
| Madison | Madison | insuffient: ( 5- 6)( 6- 3) | Madison | |
| Marquette University | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Middleton | Middleton | Middleton | ||
| Mukwonago | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Muskego | Neenah | Neenah 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Notre Dame Green Ba | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Oak Creek | Neenah | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Neenah | |
| Oconomowoc | Neenah | Neenah 4- 2 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Oneida Nation | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Oregon | Neenah | Neenah 3- 5 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Pulaski | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Sauk Prairie | Neenah | Neenah 3- 2 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Sun Prairie | Neenah | Neenah 7- 4 vs 3- 6 | ||
| Superior | Neenah | Neenah 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| University Milwauke | Neenah | Neenah 5- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Verona | Neenah | insuffient: ( 6- 4)( 7- 2) | Neenah | |
| Waukesha | Neenah | Neenah 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Waunakee | Waunakee | Waunakee 5- 1 vs 2- 5 | ||
| Wausau | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Wauwatosa | Neenah | Neenah 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| West Bend | Neenah | Neenah 4- 2 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Whitefish Bay | Neenah | Neenah 3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
PowerWise = 32
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 16.73
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Brookfield ( 0-15, 84.6) 17- 0 -15.33 2.06 0.85 0.84 2.43
0 H Kimberly (13- 5, 97.0) 9-10 -2.90 14.48 -0.85 0.84 -3.14
0 H Middleton (15- 2, 99.8) 3- 8 -0.08 17.31 -0.85 0.84 -0.78
0 A De Pere ( 8- 9, 91.0) 14- 6 -8.89 8.50 0.85 0.84 7.82
0 A Notre Dame Gr ( 7-12, 89.0) 17- 4 -10.92 6.47 0.85 0.84 6.12
0 H Marquette Univ (15- 5, 95.5) 20- 4 -4.42 12.96 -0.85 0.84 10.13
0 A Arrowhead (10- 6, 94.1) 19- 5 -5.78 11.61 0.85 0.84 10.43
0 A Pulaski ( 0-19, 82.5) 26- 1 -17.38 1.00 0.85 0.84 1.55
0 N DeForest ( 8- 7, 94.8) 6- 7 -5.11 12.28 -0.00 0.84 -4.27
0 N Mukwonago (13- 5, 97.5) 5- 4 -2.36 15.02 -0.00 0.84 12.57
0 A Appleton (12- 6, 96.1) 7- 8 -3.80 13.58 0.85 0.84 -2.47
0 H Waunakee (18- 3, 99.9) 7- 5 -0.00 17.38 -0.85 0.84 13.83
0 A Hudson ( 3- 3, 97.1) 9-10 -2.77 14.62 0.85 0.84 -1.60
0 H Wausau ( 6-11, 91.5) 20- 5 -8.37 9.01 -0.85 0.84 6.82
0 H Verona (12- 4, 96.6) 8- 9 -3.26 14.13 -0.85 0.84 -3.44
0 H Oneida Nation ( 3-10, 88.8) 21- 3 -11.08 6.30 -0.85 0.84 4.56
0 H Bay Port ( 9- 6, 93.8) 17- 3 -6.12 11.27 -0.85 0.84 8.71
0 H Janesville ( 9- 9, 93.0) 14- 1 -6.90 10.48 -0.85 0.84 8.06
0 A Verona (12- 4, 96.6) 11- 4 -3.26 14.13 0.85 0.84 12.53
0 A Waunakee (18- 3, 99.9) 7- 8 -0.00 17.38 0.85 0.84 -0.71
------
89.15
|
winning pts = 105.5626 losing points = -16.4175
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------