Notre Dame Green Ba
W-L: ( 7-12) PR = 88.9817Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 329 H Sun Prairie ( 7-10, 91.0) 3- 9 329 A La Crosse ( 7- 6, 90.9) 9-11 405 A Marquette University (15- 5, 95.5) 3-19 405 H Catholic Memorial ( 2-14, 86.6) 6- 4 407 H De Pere ( 8- 9, 91.0) 7- 6 412 H Pulaski ( 0-19, 82.5) 12- 1 412 H La Crosse ( 7- 6, 90.9) 9- 6 415 A Bay Port ( 9- 6, 93.8) 9-14 416 H Appleton (12- 6, 96.1) 1-11 421 H Neenah (13- 7, 97.7) 4-17 429 A Oneida Nation ( 3-10, 88.8) 10- 9 506 A De Pere ( 8- 9, 91.0) 9-12 510 A Kenosha (13- 6, 92.6) 10-15 510 A Elkhorn (13- 5, 92.5) 2-17 517 A Whitefish Bay ( 6-10, 87.8) 10- 9 520 A Wausau ( 6-11, 91.5) 13-18 522 A Kimberly (13- 5, 97.0) 6-15 523 A Pulaski ( 0-19, 82.5) 14- 4 527 A La Crosse ( 7- 6, 90.9) 4-11
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
329 H Sun Prairie 3- 9 -6 -1 - -3.79
329 A La Crosse 9-11 -2 -3 0.81
405 A Marquette University 3-19 -16 -7 0.00
405 H Catholic Memorial 6- 4 2 3 -1.27
407 H De Pere 7- 6 1 -1 + 2.18
412 H Pulaski 12- 1 11 7 0.00
412 H La Crosse 9- 6 3 -1 ++ 4.10
415 A Bay Port 9-14 -5 -6 0.00
416 H Appleton 1-11 -10 -6 0.00
421 H Neenah 4-17 -13 -8 0.00
429 A Oneida Nation 10- 9 1 -1 1.69
506 A De Pere 9-12 -3 -3 -0.12
510 A Kenosha 10-15 -5 -5 -0.49
510 A Elkhorn 2-17 -15 -4 -0.61
517 A Whitefish Bay 10- 9 1 0 0.64
520 A Wausau 13-18 -5 -3 -1.60
522 A Kimberly 6-15 -9 -9 0.00
523 A Pulaski 14- 4 10 6 0.00
527 A La Crosse 4-11 -7 -3 - -2.19
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 329 H Sun Prairie 3- 9 -6 -1 - -3.79 527 A La Crosse 4-11 -7 -3 - -2.19 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 412 H La Crosse 9- 6 3 -1 ++ 4.10 407 H De Pere 7- 6 1 -1 + 2.18 |
Notre Dame Green Ba Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appleton | Appleton | Appleton | ||
| Arrowhead | Arrowhead | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | Arrowhead | |
| Bay Port | Bay Port | Bay Port | ||
| Brookfield | Notre Dame Green Ba | Notre Dame Green Ba 3- 5 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Catholic Memorial | Notre Dame Green Ba | Notre Dame Green Ba | ||
| Cedarburg | Cedarburg | insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 4) | Cedarburg | |
| De Pere | De Pere | insuffient: ( 2- 7)( 3- 6) | De Pere | |
| DeForest | DeForest | DeForest 4- 1 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Elkhorn | Elkhorn | Elkhorn | ||
| Franklin | Franklin | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | Franklin | |
| Hamilton | Hamilton | insuffient: ( 1- 5)( 2- 4) | Hamilton | |
| Homestead | Homestead | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | Homestead | |
| Hudson | Hudson | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Hudson | |
| Janesville | Janesville | Janesville 5- 2 vs 3- 5 | ||
| Kenosha | Kenosha | Kenosha | ||
| Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Kimberly | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| La Crosse | La Crosse | La Crosse | ||
| Madison | Madison | Madison 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Marquette University | Marquette University | Marquette University | ||
| Middleton | Middleton | Middleton 7- 0 vs 1- 7 | ||
| Mukwonago | Mukwonago | Mukwonago 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Muskego | Notre Dame Green Ba | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | Notre Dame Green Ba | |
| Neenah | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Oak Creek | Notre Dame Green Ba | Notre Dame Green Ba 3- 3 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Oconomowoc | Oconomowoc | tied - ( 1- 4) ( 1- 4) | Oconomowoc | |
| Oneida Nation | Notre Dame Green Ba | Notre Dame Green Ba | ||
| Oregon | Oregon | Oregon 3- 0 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Pulaski | Notre Dame Green Ba | Notre Dame Green Ba | ||
| Sauk Prairie | Notre Dame Green Ba | insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 2) | Notre Dame Green Ba | |
| Sun Prairie | Sun Prairie | Sun Prairie | ||
| Superior | Notre Dame Green Ba | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Notre Dame Green Ba | |
| University Milwauke | University Milwauke | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | University Milwauke | |
| Verona | Verona | Verona 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Waukesha | Waukesha | Waukesha 5- 2 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Waunakee | Waunakee | Waunakee 4- 1 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Wausau | Wausau | Wausau | ||
| Wauwatosa | Wauwatosa | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Wauwatosa | |
| West Bend | Notre Dame Green Ba | Notre Dame Green Ba 3- 5 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Whitefish Bay | Notre Dame Green Ba | Notre Dame Green Ba |
PowerWise = 10
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 16.73
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Sun Prairie ( 7-10, 91.0) 3- 9 -8.86 8.52 -0.85 0.88 -8.55
0 A La Crosse ( 7- 6, 90.9) 9-11 -8.96 8.42 0.85 0.88 -7.14
0 A Marquette Univ (15- 5, 95.5) 3-19 -4.42 12.96 0.85 0.88 -3.14
0 H Catholic Memor ( 2-14, 86.6) 6- 4 -13.34 4.05 -0.85 0.88 2.81
0 H De Pere ( 8- 9, 91.0) 7- 6 -8.89 8.50 -0.85 0.88 6.73
0 H Pulaski ( 0-19, 82.5) 12- 1 -17.38 1.00 -0.85 0.88 0.13
0 H La Crosse ( 7- 6, 90.9) 9- 6 -8.96 8.42 -0.85 0.88 6.66
0 A Bay Port ( 9- 6, 93.8) 9-14 -6.12 11.27 0.85 0.88 -4.64
0 H Appleton (12- 6, 96.1) 1-11 -3.80 13.58 -0.85 0.88 -4.10
0 H Neenah (13- 7, 97.7) 4-17 -2.21 15.18 -0.85 0.88 -2.70
0 A Oneida Nation ( 3-10, 88.8) 10- 9 -11.08 6.30 0.85 0.88 6.30
0 A De Pere ( 8- 9, 91.0) 9-12 -8.89 8.50 0.85 0.88 -7.07
0 A Kenosha (13- 6, 92.6) 10-15 -7.26 10.12 0.85 0.88 -5.64
0 A Elkhorn (13- 5, 92.5) 2-17 -7.38 10.01 0.85 0.88 -5.74
0 A Whitefish Bay ( 6-10, 87.8) 10- 9 -12.13 5.25 0.85 0.88 5.38
0 A Wausau ( 6-11, 91.5) 13-18 -8.37 9.01 0.85 0.88 -6.62
0 A Kimberly (13- 5, 97.0) 6-15 -2.90 14.48 0.85 0.88 -1.81
0 A Pulaski ( 0-19, 82.5) 14- 4 -17.38 1.00 0.85 0.88 1.63
0 A La Crosse ( 7- 6, 90.9) 4-11 -8.96 8.42 0.85 0.88 -7.14
------
-34.66
|
winning pts = 29.6449 losing points = -64.3083
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------