Mount Si
W-L: (17- 2) PR = 99.9000Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 314 H Newport ( 2-11, 79.4) 21- 0 319 H Rogers (12- 3, 94.9) 18- 4 320 H Graham Kapowsin ( 5- 8, 88.7) 18- 3 322 A Mercer Island (12- 3, 99.1) 11-12 325 A Bothell (11- 5, 96.2) 9- 6 327 H Eastside Catholic ( 8- 4, 94.7) 11- 5 329 A Eastlake (16- 3, 99.5) 11- 7 402 H Bellevue ( 9- 5, 96.5) 14-10 412 H Lake Stevens ( 7- 7, 90.0) 16- 3 422 H O'Dea (11- 4, 98.0) 9- 6 423 A Seattle Academy ( 5- 8, 92.0) 16- 3 425 H Issaquah ( 5- 8, 91.9) 17- 7 426 H Skyline ( 5- 7, 93.4) 14- 5 429 A Woodinville ( 4-10, 90.1) 21- 0 502 H Juanita ( 2-10, 89.1) 24- 2 509 H Auburn Riverside ( 9- 3, 91.2) 13- 3 517 H Tahoma ( 7- 6, 92.7) 15- 6 521 H Curtis (11- 4, 97.9) 11-10 524 H Eastlake (16- 3, 99.5) 8- 9
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
314 H Newport 21- 0 21 21 0.00
319 H Rogers 18- 4 14 5 0.00
320 H Graham Kapowsin 18- 3 15 12 0.00
322 A Mercer Island 11-12 -1 0 -1.27
325 A Bothell 9- 6 3 3 -0.13
327 H Eastside Catholic 11- 5 6 6 0.00
329 A Eastlake 11- 7 4 0 ++ 4.16
402 H Bellevue 14-10 4 4 0.05
412 H Lake Stevens 16- 3 13 10 0.00
422 H O'Dea 9- 6 3 2 0.62
423 A Seattle Academy 16- 3 13 7 0.00
425 H Issaquah 17- 7 10 8 0.00
426 H Skyline 14- 5 9 7 0.00
429 A Woodinville 21- 0 21 9 0.00
502 H Juanita 24- 2 22 11 0.00
509 H Auburn Riverside 13- 3 10 9 0.00
517 H Tahoma 15- 6 9 8 0.00
521 H Curtis 11-10 1 3 -1.50
524 H Eastlake 8- 9 -1 1 -1.88
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 329 A Eastlake 11- 7 4 0 ++ 4.16 |
Mount Si Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anacortes | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Archbishop Murphy | Mount Si | Mount Si 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Arlington | Mount Si | Mount Si 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Auburn Riverside | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Bainbridge Island | Mount Si | Mount Si 5- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Ballard | Mount Si | Mount Si 4- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Bellarmine Prep | Mount Si | Mount Si 7- 2 vs 4- 4 | ||
| Bellevue | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Bellingham | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Blanchet | Mount Si | Mount Si 6- 0 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Bonney Lake | Mount Si | Mount Si 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Bothell | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Burlington-Edison | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Camas | Mount Si | Mount Si 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Cedarcrest | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Chiawana | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Curtis | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| East Valley | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Eastlake | Mount Si | tied - ( 9- 1) ( 9- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Eastside Catholic | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Emerald Ridge | Mount Si | Mount Si 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Enumclaw | Mount Si | Mount Si 5- 0 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Franklin | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Gig Harbor | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Glacier Peak | Mount Si | Mount Si 4- 1 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Graham Kapowsin | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Hanford | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Hermiston | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Inglemoor | Mount Si | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Mount Si | |
| Interlake | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Issaquah | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Jackson | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Juanita | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Kamiak | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Kamiakin | Mount Si | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Mount Si | |
| Kennedy Catholic | Mount Si | Mount Si 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Klahowya | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Lake Stevens | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Lake Washington | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Lakeside | Mount Si | Mount Si 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Liberty | Mount Si | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Mount Si | |
| Lincoln | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Lynden | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Marysville Getchell | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Mercer Island | Mercer Island | Mercer Island | ||
| Monroe | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Mount Vernon | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Mountain View | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Nathan Hale | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Newport | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| North Creek | Mount Si | Mount Si 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| North Kitsap | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| O'Dea | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Olympia | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Orting | Mount Si | Mount Si 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Overlake | Mount Si | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Mount Si | |
| Peninsula | Mount Si | Mount Si 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Providence Classical | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Puyallup | Mount Si | Mount Si 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Redmond | Mount Si | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Mount Si | |
| Richland | Mount Si | Mount Si 3- 1 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Rogers | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Roosevelt | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Sammamish | Mount Si | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Mount Si | |
| Seattle Academy | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Seattle Prep | Mount Si | tied - ( 6- 2) ( 6- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Sedro-Woolley | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Sehome | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Selah | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Shorecrest | Mount Si | Mount Si 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Skyline | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Skyview | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Snohomish | Mount Si | Mount Si 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| South Kitsap | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Southridge | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Squalicum | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Stadium | Mount Si | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Mount Si | |
| Stanwood | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Mount Si | |
| Sumner | Mount Si | Mount Si 6- 2 vs 2- 5 | ||
| Tahoma | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Union | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Vashon Island | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Walla Walla | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| Wenatchee | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| West Seattle | Mount Si | Mount Si | ||
| White River | Mount Si | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mount Si | |
| Woodinville | Mount Si | Mount Si |
PowerWise = 86
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 11.34
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Newport ( 2-11, 79.4) 21- 0 -20.46 5.34 -0.52 0.60 2.88
0 H Rogers (12- 3, 94.9) 18- 4 -4.96 20.84 -0.52 0.60 12.13
0 H Graham Kapowsi ( 5- 8, 88.7) 18- 3 -11.18 14.62 -0.52 0.60 8.42
0 A Mercer Island (12- 3, 99.1) 11-12 -0.79 25.01 0.52 0.60 -0.16
0 A Bothell (11- 5, 96.2) 9- 6 -3.66 22.14 0.52 0.60 13.53
0 H Eastside Catho ( 8- 4, 94.7) 11- 5 -5.24 20.56 -0.52 0.60 11.96
0 A Eastlake (16- 3, 99.5) 11- 7 -0.36 25.44 0.52 0.60 15.50
0 H Bellevue ( 9- 5, 96.5) 14-10 -3.43 22.37 -0.52 0.60 13.04
0 H Lake Stevens ( 7- 7, 90.0) 16- 3 -9.86 15.94 -0.52 0.60 9.21
0 H O'Dea (11- 4, 98.0) 9- 6 -1.86 23.94 -0.52 0.60 13.98
0 A Seattle Academ ( 5- 8, 92.0) 16- 3 -7.87 17.93 0.52 0.60 11.01
0 H Issaquah ( 5- 8, 91.9) 17- 7 -7.98 17.82 -0.52 0.60 10.33
0 H Skyline ( 5- 7, 93.4) 14- 5 -6.46 19.34 -0.52 0.60 11.23
0 A Woodinville ( 4-10, 90.1) 21- 0 -9.80 16.00 0.52 0.60 9.86
0 H Juanita ( 2-10, 89.1) 24- 2 -10.84 14.96 -0.52 0.60 8.62
0 H Auburn Riversi ( 9- 3, 91.2) 13- 3 -8.72 17.08 -0.52 0.60 9.89
0 H Tahoma ( 7- 6, 92.7) 15- 6 -7.23 18.57 -0.52 0.60 10.77
0 H Curtis (11- 4, 97.9) 11-10 -1.98 23.82 -0.52 0.60 13.91
0 H Eastlake (16- 3, 99.5) 8- 9 -0.36 25.44 -0.52 0.60 -0.53
------
185.57
|
winning pts = 186.2579 losing points = -0.6854
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------