Mauldin
W-L: (13- 4) PR = 93.1639Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 224 H Catawba Ridge ( 3-10, 87.6) 18- 9 226 H Spartanburg ( 8- 8, 89.7) 16- 2 301 A Chapin (10- 7, 93.5) 12- 7 303 H Eastside ( 9- 8, 90.5) 5-10 305 H Greenville ( 9- 4, 91.7) 8- 7 308 A Clover (11- 2, 94.5) 9-15 311 A Boiling Springs (13- 4, 95.3) 6- 9 312 A Hillcrest ( 4- 5, 83.3) 15- 1 314 A Socastee ( 8- 8, 84.7) 16- 3 315 A St James ( 5-10, 84.1) 13- 2 326 H Christ Church Episco (10- 7, 93.1) 10- 2 403 H Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 10- 9 404 A Lexington ( 7- 9, 89.9) 10- 9 409 H Woodmont ( 4- 8, 80.1) 23- 2 414 H JL Mann Academy ( 6- 6, 91.0) 10- 6 417 H TL Hanna ( 7- 8, 84.8) 18- 2 425 H Boiling Springs (13- 4, 95.3) 12-13
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
224 H Catawba Ridge 18- 9 9 6 0.00
226 H Spartanburg 16- 2 14 4 1.20
301 A Chapin 12- 7 5 -1 ++ 5.70
303 H Eastside 5-10 -5 3 --- -7.96
305 H Greenville 8- 7 1 2 -0.79
308 A Clover 9-15 -6 -2 - -3.30
311 A Boiling Springs 6- 9 -3 -3 -0.49
312 A Hillcrest 15- 1 14 10 0.00
314 A Socastee 16- 3 13 8 0.00
315 A St James 13- 2 11 9 0.00
326 H Christ Church Episco 10- 2 8 0 ++ 4.57
403 H Dorman 10- 9 1 0 0.77
404 A Lexington 10- 9 1 3 -1.98
409 H Woodmont 23- 2 21 13 0.00
414 H JL Mann Academy 10- 6 4 3 1.46
417 H TL Hanna 18- 2 16 9 0.00
425 H Boiling Springs 12-13 -1 -2 0.84
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 303 H Eastside 5-10 -5 3 --- -7.96 308 A Clover 9-15 -6 -2 - -3.30 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 301 A Chapin 12- 7 5 -1 ++ 5.70 326 H Christ Church Episco 10- 2 8 0 ++ 4.57 |
Mauldin Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | AC Flora | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | AC Flora | |
| Academic Magnet Char | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Aiken | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Atlantic Collegiate | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Beaufort | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Bishop England | Mauldin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mauldin | |
| Bluffton | Mauldin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mauldin | |
| Blythewood | Mauldin | Mauldin 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | Boiling Springs | ||
| Byrnes | Mauldin | Mauldin 6- 2 vs 2- 6 | ||
| Camden Military Acad | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Carolina Forest | Mauldin | Mauldin 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Catawba Ridge | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Chapin | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Christ Church Episco | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Clover | Clover | Clover | ||
| Dorman | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Dutch Fork | Mauldin | Mauldin 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Eastside | Eastside | Eastside | ||
| Fort Mill | Mauldin | insuffient: ( 5- 1)( 4- 2) | Mauldin | |
| Fox Creek | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Gilbert | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Greenville | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Hammond School | Mauldin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mauldin | |
| Heathwood Hall | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Hillcrest | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Hilton Head | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Hilton Head Christia | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| James Island Charter | Mauldin | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Mauldin | |
| JL Mann Academy | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Laurence Manning Aca | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Legion Collegiate Ac | Mauldin | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mauldin | |
| Lexington | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) | Lucy Beckham | |
| May River | Mauldin | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Mauldin | |
| Myrtle Beach | Mauldin | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Mauldin | |
| Nation Ford | Mauldin | tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) | Mauldin | |
| North Myrtle Beach | Mauldin | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Mauldin | |
| Oceanside Academy | Oceanside Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Oceanside Academy | |
| Philip Simmons | Mauldin | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Mauldin | |
| Porter-Gaud | Porter-Gaud | Porter-Gaud | ||
| River Bluff | Mauldin | Mauldin 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Riverside | Mauldin | Mauldin 8- 2 vs 2- 8 | ||
| Socastee | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Spartanburg | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Spring Valley | Mauldin | Mauldin 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| St James | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| St Joseph Catholic | Mauldin | Mauldin 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| TL Hanna | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Trinity Collegiate | Mauldin | Mauldin | ||
| Waccamaw | Mauldin | Mauldin 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Wade Hampton | Mauldin | Mauldin 5- 2 vs 0- 7 | ||
| Wando | Wando | tied - ( 4- 0) ( 4- 0) | Wando | |
| Westside | Mauldin | Mauldin 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| White Knoll | Mauldin | Mauldin 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Woodmont | Mauldin | Mauldin |
PowerWise = 48
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.54
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Catawba Ridge ( 3-10, 87.6) 18- 9 -12.31 14.29 -0.33 0.80 11.12
0 H Spartanburg ( 8- 8, 89.7) 16- 2 -10.20 16.40 -0.33 0.80 12.80
0 A Chapin (10- 7, 93.5) 12- 7 -6.37 20.24 0.33 0.80 16.39
0 H Eastside ( 9- 8, 90.5) 5-10 -9.37 17.24 -0.33 0.80 -7.73
0 H Greenville ( 9- 4, 91.7) 8- 7 -8.19 18.41 -0.33 0.80 14.40
0 A Clover (11- 2, 94.5) 9-15 -5.37 21.23 0.33 0.80 -4.01
0 A Boiling Spring (13- 4, 95.3) 6- 9 -4.56 22.04 0.33 0.80 -3.37
0 A Hillcrest ( 4- 5, 83.3) 15- 1 -16.59 10.01 0.33 0.80 8.24
0 A Socastee ( 8- 8, 84.7) 16- 3 -15.25 11.36 0.33 0.80 9.31
0 A St James ( 5-10, 84.1) 13- 2 -15.77 10.84 0.33 0.80 8.90
0 H Christ Church (10- 7, 93.1) 10- 2 -6.83 19.77 -0.33 0.80 15.49
0 H Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 10- 9 -6.64 19.97 -0.33 0.80 15.64
0 A Lexington ( 7- 9, 89.9) 10- 9 -10.05 16.56 0.33 0.80 13.46
0 H Woodmont ( 4- 8, 80.1) 23- 2 -19.84 6.76 -0.33 0.80 5.12
0 H JL Mann Academ ( 6- 6, 91.0) 10- 6 -8.94 17.66 -0.33 0.80 13.81
0 H TL Hanna ( 7- 8, 84.8) 18- 2 -15.09 11.51 -0.33 0.80 8.90
0 H Boiling Spring (13- 4, 95.3) 12-13 -4.56 22.04 -0.33 0.80 -3.90
------
134.58
|
winning pts = 153.5864 losing points = -19.0059
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------