Logos
W-L: ( 6- 7) PR = 85.4805Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 322 H Mount Spokane (21- 3, 93.3) 7- 6 326 A Sandpoint ( 8-10, 86.3) 4-14 328 H Spokane ( 7- 8, 88.4) 4- 7 401 H Immaculate Conceptio ( 0-13, 78.3) 12- 2 405 A Immaculate Conceptio ( 0-13, 78.3) 10- 5 409 A Lake City (11- 7, 88.8) 4-10 416 A Spokane Valley (12- 8, 90.3) 7-17 421 H Coeur d'Alene ( 3-13, 87.0) 4- 2 423 A Chesterton of Notre ( 1-11, 81.4) 15- 7 430 H Sandpoint ( 8-10, 86.3) 1- 7 503 H Lake City (11- 7, 88.8) 4-13 507 H Chesterton of Notre ( 1-11, 81.4) 12- 2 509 A Mount Spokane (21- 3, 93.3) 0- 1
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
322 H Mount Spokane 7- 6 1 -8 +++ 6.00
326 A Sandpoint 4-14 -10 -1 -- -4.02
328 H Spokane 4- 7 -3 -3 -0.23
401 H Immaculate Conceptio 12- 2 10 7 0.00
405 A Immaculate Conceptio 10- 5 5 7 0.00
409 A Lake City 4-10 -6 -3 -1.56
416 A Spokane Valley 7-17 -10 -5 -0.03
421 H Coeur d'Alene 4- 2 2 -1 + 3.43
423 A Chesterton of Notre 15- 7 8 4 1.05
430 H Sandpoint 1- 7 -6 -1 -- -4.27
503 H Lake City 4-13 -9 -3 -1.82
507 H Chesterton of Notre 12- 2 10 4 0.80
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 326 A Sandpoint 4-14 -10 -1 -- -4.02 430 H Sandpoint 1- 7 -6 -1 -- -4.27 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 322 H Mount Spokane 7- 6 1 -8 +++ 6.00 421 H Coeur d'Alene 4- 2 2 -1 + 3.43 |
Logos Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammon | Ammon | Ammon 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Bishop Kelly | Bishop Kelly | Bishop Kelly | ||
| Boise | Boise | Boise | ||
| Borah/Capital | Logos | Logos | ||
| Centennial | Logos | Logos | ||
| Chesterton of Notre | Logos | Logos | ||
| Coeur d'Alene | Logos | Logos | ||
| Eagle | Eagle | Eagle | ||
| Emmett | Logos | Logos | ||
| Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Idaho Falls | |
| Immaculate Conceptio | Logos | Logos | ||
| Jackson Hole | Jackson Hole | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 1) | Jackson Hole | |
| Kuna | Logos | Logos | ||
| Lake City | Lake City | Lake City | ||
| Magic Valley | Logos | Logos | ||
| Meridian | Logos | Logos | ||
| Middleton | Logos | Logos | ||
| Mountain View | Mountain View | Mountain View | ||
| Owyhee | Logos | Logos | ||
| Pocatello | Pocatello | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Pocatello | |
| Rocky Mountain | Rocky Mountain | Rocky Mountain | ||
| Sandpoint | Sandpoint | Sandpoint | ||
| Spokane | Spokane | Spokane | ||
| Spokane Valley | Spokane Valley | Spokane Valley | ||
| Sun Valley | Sun Valley | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Sun Valley | |
| Teton Valley | Teton Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 2) | Teton Valley | |
| Timberline | Timberline | Timberline | ||
| Vallivue | Vallivue | Vallivue | ||
| Gonzaga Prep | Gonzaga Prep | Gonzaga Prep 6- 1 vs 3- 5 | ||
| Lewis & Clark | Lewis & Clark | Lewis & Clark | ||
| Mead | Mead | Mead 5- 1 vs 2- 5 | ||
| Mount Spokane | Mount Spokane | Mount Spokane 7- 0 vs 3- 4 |
PowerWise = 11
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.45
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Mount Spokane (21- 3, 93.3) 7- 6 -6.60 15.07 -0.13 1.03 15.46
0 A Sandpoint ( 8-10, 86.3) 4-14 -13.56 8.10 0.13 1.03 -13.91
0 H Spokane ( 7- 8, 88.4) 4- 7 -11.53 10.14 -0.13 1.03 -12.06
0 H Immaculate Con ( 0-13, 78.3) 12- 2 -21.59 1.00 -0.13 1.03 0.90
0 A Immaculate Con ( 0-13, 78.3) 10- 5 -21.59 1.00 0.13 1.03 1.17
0 A Lake City (11- 7, 88.8) 4-10 -11.11 10.55 0.13 1.03 -11.37
0 A Spokane Valley (12- 8, 90.3) 7-17 -9.58 12.08 0.13 1.03 -9.78
0 H Coeur d'Alene ( 3-13, 87.0) 4- 2 -12.86 8.80 -0.13 1.03 8.98
0 A Chesterton of ( 1-11, 81.4) 15- 7 -18.50 3.17 0.13 1.03 3.41
0 H Sandpoint ( 8-10, 86.3) 1- 7 -13.56 8.10 -0.13 1.03 -14.17
0 H Lake City (11- 7, 88.8) 4-13 -11.11 10.55 -0.13 1.03 -11.63
0 H Chesterton of ( 1-11, 81.4) 12- 2 -18.50 3.17 -0.13 1.03 3.15
0 A Mount Spokane (21- 3, 93.3) 0- 1 -6.60 15.07 0.13 1.03 -6.69
------
-46.54
|
winning pts = 33.0682 losing points = -79.6105
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------