Jonathan Law
W-L: ( 5-11) PR = 74.5485Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 405 A Lyman Hall ( 5-11, 78.0) 5- 8 412 A Foran (12- 6, 83.4) 2-15 415 H Wilbur Cross ( 5-11, 72.9) 9- 8 417 H Ledyard-Griswold ( 8- 8, 75.4) 11- 7 422 A North Haven ( 5-11, 77.1) 5-11 424 H Lyman Hall ( 5-11, 78.0) 6-12 426 A Wilbur Cross ( 5-11, 72.9) 18- 1 429 H Sheehan (15- 5, 84.5) 7-19 501 A Norwich Tech ( 5-11, 66.9) 17- 5 506 A Shelton ( 6-10, 76.2) 7-11 508 A Hamden (11- 6, 81.3) 1-18 510 A Morgan School ( 8-10, 78.1) 5-15 513 H West Haven ( 5-11, 71.1) 8- 4 516 H Foran (12- 6, 83.4) 6-18 520 H Amity Regional (10- 7, 84.1) 2-15 521 H Branford ( 9- 8, 78.7) 7-17
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
405 A Lyman Hall 5- 8 -3 -4 0.95
412 A Foran 2-15 -13 -9 0.00
415 H Wilbur Cross 9- 8 1 2 -1.12
417 H Ledyard-Griswold 11- 7 4 0 ++ 4.37
422 A North Haven 5-11 -6 -3 -2.00
424 H Lyman Hall 6-12 -6 -3 -2.00
426 A Wilbur Cross 18- 1 17 1 + 3.83
429 H Sheehan 7-19 -12 -9 0.00
501 A Norwich Tech 17- 5 12 7 0.00
506 A Shelton 7-11 -4 -2 -1.88
508 A Hamden 1-18 -17 -7 0.00
510 A Morgan School 5-15 -10 -4 -0.95
513 H West Haven 8- 4 4 4 0.08
516 H Foran 6-18 -12 -8 0.00
520 H Amity Regional 2-15 -13 -9 0.00
521 H Branford 7-17 -10 -4 -1.34
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 417 H Ledyard-Griswold 11- 7 4 0 ++ 4.37 426 A Wilbur Cross 18- 1 17 1 + 3.83 |
Jonathan Law Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amity Regional | Amity Regional | Amity Regional | ||
| Avon HS | Avon HS | Avon HS | ||
| Bacon Academy | Bacon Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bacon Academy | |
| Berlin | Berlin | Berlin | ||
| Bethel | Bethel | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bethel | |
| Branford | Branford | Branford | ||
| Brien McMahon | Brien McMahon | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Brien McMahon | |
| Bristol Co-Op | Bristol Co-Op | Bristol Co-Op | ||
| Brookfield | Brookfield | Brookfield 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Bunnell-Stratford | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law | ||
| Canton | Canton | Canton | ||
| Capital-Classical Pr | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law | ||
| Cheshire HS | Cheshire HS | Cheshire HS 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Conard | Conard | Conard | ||
| Cromwell | Jonathan Law | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Jonathan Law | |
| Danbury | Jonathan Law | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Jonathan Law | |
| Daniel Hand | Daniel Hand | Daniel Hand 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Darien | Darien | Darien | ||
| East Catholic | East Catholic | East Catholic | ||
| East Lyme | East Lyme | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | East Lyme | |
| Ellington | Ellington | Ellington | ||
| Enfield | Enfield | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Enfield | |
| EO Smith | EO Smith | EO Smith | ||
| Fairfield Ludlowe | Fairfield Ludlowe | Fairfield Ludlowe | ||
| Fairfield Prep | Fairfield Prep | Fairfield Prep 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Fairfield Warde | Fairfield Warde | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Fairfield Warde | |
| Farmington | Farmington | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Farmington | |
| Fitch Groton | Fitch Groton | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Fitch Groton | |
| Foran | Foran | Foran | ||
| Glastonbury | Glastonbury | Glastonbury | ||
| Granby Memorial | Granby Memorial | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Granby Memorial | |
| Greenwich HS | Greenwich HS | Greenwich HS | ||
| Guilford | Guilford | Guilford 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Haddam-Killingworth | Haddam-Killingworth | Haddam-Killingworth 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Hall | Hall | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Hall | |
| Hamden | Hamden | Hamden | ||
| Holy Cross | Holy Cross | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Holy Cross | |
| Immaculate Danbury | Immaculate Danbury | Immaculate Danbury | ||
| Joel Barlow | Joel Barlow | Joel Barlow | ||
| Lakeview United | Jonathan Law | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Jonathan Law | |
| Ledyard-Griswold | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law | ||
| Lewis Mills | Lewis Mills | Lewis Mills | ||
| Lyman Hall | Lyman Hall | Lyman Hall | ||
| Maloney-Platt | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Masuk | Masuk | Masuk 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Middletown | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Montville | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Morgan School | Morgan School | Morgan School | ||
| New Canaan | New Canaan | New Canaan | ||
| New Fairfield | New Fairfield | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | New Fairfield | |
| New Milford | New Milford | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | New Milford | |
| Newington | Newington | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Newington | |
| Newtown | Newtown | Newtown | ||
| North Branford | North Branford | North Branford 3- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| North Haven | North Haven | North Haven | ||
| Northwest Catholic | Northwest Catholic | Northwest Catholic | ||
| Norwalk | Jonathan Law | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Jonathan Law | |
| Norwich Free Academy | Jonathan Law | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Jonathan Law | |
| Norwich Tech | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law | ||
| Notre Dame-Fairfield | Jonathan Law | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Jonathan Law | |
| Notre Dame-West Have | Notre Dame-West Have | Notre Dame-West Have 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Old Lyme | Old Lyme | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Old Lyme | |
| Old Saybrook | Old Saybrook | Old Saybrook 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Pomperaug | Pomperaug | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Pomperaug | |
| Prince-Cheney Tech | Jonathan Law | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Jonathan Law | |
| RHAM | RHAM | RHAM | ||
| Ridgefield | Ridgefield | Ridgefield | ||
| Rockville Co-op | Jonathan Law | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Jonathan Law | |
| Rocky Hill | Jonathan Law | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Jonathan Law | |
| Sheehan | Sheehan | Sheehan | ||
| Shelton | Shelton | Shelton | ||
| Simsbury | Simsbury | Simsbury | ||
| Somers | Somers | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 0) | Somers | |
| South Windsor | South Windsor | South Windsor | ||
| Southington | Southington | Southington | ||
| St Bernard-Wheeler | St Bernard-Wheeler | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | St Bernard-Wheeler | |
| St Joseph Trumbull | St Joseph Trumbull | St Joseph Trumbull | ||
| St Paul Catholic | St Paul Catholic | St Paul Catholic | ||
| Stamford | Stamford | Stamford | ||
| Staples | Staples | Staples | ||
| Stonington | Stonington | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | Stonington | |
| Suffield | Suffield | Suffield | ||
| Tolland | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law | ||
| Trumbull | Trumbull | Trumbull | ||
| Valley Regional | Valley Regional | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Valley Regional | |
| Vinal/Goodwin Tech | Jonathan Law | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Jonathan Law | |
| Waterford | Waterford | Waterford 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Watertown | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law | ||
| West Haven | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law | ||
| Westhill | Jonathan Law | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Jonathan Law | |
| Weston | Weston | Weston | ||
| Wethersfield | Wethersfield | Wethersfield | ||
| Wilbur Cross | Jonathan Law | Jonathan Law | ||
| Wilton | Wilton | Wilton | ||
| Windsor | Jonathan Law | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Jonathan Law | |
| Wolcott | Jonathan Law | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Jonathan Law | |
| Woodstock Academy | Jonathan Law | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Jonathan Law | |
| Xavier | Xavier | Xavier 2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
PowerWise = 25
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 17.01
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Lyman Hall ( 5-11, 78.0) 5- 8 -21.88 18.38 0.47 1.06 -22.75
0 A Foran (12- 6, 83.4) 2-15 -16.49 23.77 0.47 1.06 -17.03
0 H Wilbur Cross ( 5-11, 72.9) 9- 8 -27.00 13.26 -0.47 1.06 13.59
0 H Ledyard-Griswo ( 8- 8, 75.4) 11- 7 -24.51 15.75 -0.47 1.06 16.24
0 A North Haven ( 5-11, 77.1) 5-11 -22.82 17.43 0.47 1.06 -23.76
0 H Lyman Hall ( 5-11, 78.0) 6-12 -21.88 18.38 -0.47 1.06 -23.76
0 A Wilbur Cross ( 5-11, 72.9) 18- 1 -27.00 13.26 0.47 1.06 14.60
0 H Sheehan (15- 5, 84.5) 7-19 -15.41 24.84 -0.47 1.06 -16.89
0 A Norwich Tech ( 5-11, 66.9) 17- 5 -33.02 7.24 0.47 1.06 8.20
0 A Shelton ( 6-10, 76.2) 7-11 -23.71 16.55 0.47 1.06 -24.70
0 A Hamden (11- 6, 81.3) 1-18 -18.65 21.61 0.47 1.06 -19.32
0 A Morgan School ( 8-10, 78.1) 5-15 -21.77 18.48 0.47 1.06 -22.64
0 H West Haven ( 5-11, 71.1) 8- 4 -28.79 11.46 -0.47 1.06 11.68
0 H Foran (12- 6, 83.4) 6-18 -16.49 23.77 -0.47 1.06 -18.03
0 H Amity Regional (10- 7, 84.1) 2-15 -15.77 24.49 -0.47 1.06 -17.27
0 H Branford ( 9- 8, 78.7) 7-17 -21.22 19.04 -0.47 1.06 -23.06
------
-164.91
|
winning pts = 64.3018 losing points = -229.2161
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------