La Salle Academy
W-L: (12- 0) PR = 99.9000Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 407 H North Kingstown ( 6- 9, 92.3) 22- 6 421 H Pilgrim ( 7- 9, 90.4) 18- 1 424 H Bishop Hendricken ( 6-10, 92.8) 27- 3 428 H Barrington ( 7- 5, 94.1) 21- 5 501 A Barrington ( 7- 5, 94.1) 20- 3 508 A North Kingstown ( 6- 9, 92.3) 13- 4 510 A Bishop Hendricken ( 6-10, 92.8) 17- 2 512 H Cumberland ( 3-11, 90.3) 21- 6 515 A South Kingstown (10- 8, 92.7) 20- 9 519 H Moses Brown School ( 9- 2, 97.8) 9- 6 603 H South Kingstown (10- 8, 92.7) 20- 2 607 N Moses Brown School ( 9- 2, 97.8) 8- 6
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
407 H North Kingstown 22- 6 16 8 0.00
421 H Pilgrim 18- 1 17 10 0.00
424 H Bishop Hendricken 27- 3 24 7 0.00
428 H Barrington 21- 5 16 6 0.00
501 A Barrington 20- 3 17 5 0.00
508 A North Kingstown 13- 4 9 7 0.00
510 A Bishop Hendricken 17- 2 15 7 0.00
512 H Cumberland 21- 6 15 10 0.00
515 A South Kingstown 20- 9 11 7 0.00
519 H Moses Brown School 9- 6 3 3 0.50
603 H South Kingstown 20- 2 18 8 0.00
607 N Moses Brown School 8- 6 2 2 -0.08
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
La Salle Academy Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barrington | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Bishop Hendricken | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Burrillville | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Chariho | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Classical | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Coventry | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Cranston East | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Cranston West | La Salle Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | La Salle Academy | |
| Cumberland | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| East Greenwich | La Salle Academy | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | La Salle Academy | |
| East Providence | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Lincoln | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Middletown | La Salle Academy | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | La Salle Academy | |
| Moses Brown School | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Mount Hope | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Narragansett | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| North Kingstown | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| North Providence | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| North Smithfield | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Pilgrim | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Ponaganset | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Portsmouth | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Prout/Exeter-West Gr | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Providence CDS-St Ra | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Rogers | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Scituate | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Smithfield | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| South Kingstown | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Tiverton | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Toll Gate | La Salle Academy | La Salle Academy | ||
| Westerly | La Salle Academy | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | La Salle Academy |
PowerWise = 31
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.69
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H North Kingstow ( 6- 9, 92.3) 22- 6 -7.64 21.98 -0.42 1.31 28.19
0 H Pilgrim ( 7- 9, 90.4) 18- 1 -9.48 20.15 -0.42 1.31 25.80
0 H Bishop Hendric ( 6-10, 92.8) 27- 3 -7.07 22.56 -0.42 1.31 28.94
0 H Barrington ( 7- 5, 94.1) 21- 5 -5.76 23.87 -0.42 1.31 30.66
0 A Barrington ( 7- 5, 94.1) 20- 3 -5.76 23.87 0.42 1.31 31.75
0 A North Kingstow ( 6- 9, 92.3) 13- 4 -7.64 21.98 0.42 1.31 29.28
0 A Bishop Hendric ( 6-10, 92.8) 17- 2 -7.07 22.56 0.42 1.31 30.03
0 H Cumberland ( 3-11, 90.3) 21- 6 -9.62 20.00 -0.42 1.31 25.61
0 A South Kingstow (10- 8, 92.7) 20- 9 -7.17 22.46 0.42 1.31 29.90
0 H Moses Brown Sc ( 9- 2, 97.8) 9- 6 -2.08 27.54 -0.42 1.31 35.46
0 H South Kingstow (10- 8, 92.7) 20- 2 -7.17 22.46 -0.42 1.31 28.81
0 N Moses Brown Sc ( 9- 2, 97.8) 8- 6 -2.08 27.54 -0.00 1.31 36.01
------
360.46
|
winning pts = 360.4614 losing points = 0.0000
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------